Mac50702
Well-Known Member
Don't pay players. Raise the academic requirements. Get the guys that are just coming to play sports out of college where they never belonged in the first place.
I think the sport you're looking for is Lacrosse.
Don't pay players. Raise the academic requirements. Get the guys that are just coming to play sports out of college where they never belonged in the first place.
Paying players? No. But, there are some rules that I think needs to be relaxed. College athletes get an opportunity that most students don't. But they are denied an awful lot of things that a typical college student can do/get.
1. Drew Tate has to refuse prize money for winning a hole-in-one contest. I wouldn't have to do that as a normal student.
2. Jeremy Bloom. An Olympic-class skier is forced to choose either skiing (and the Olympics) or college football. The NCAA really dropped the ball on this case. The endorsements that Bloom had were ONLY regarding his talents as a skier, and he needed that money to fund his training (training at that level can cost in excess of $100,000 per year). He wasn't out buying an Escalade or 300. He was training for the Olympics. Ineligible.
I remember reading about Darnell Autry, who was a drama major, having to go through all kinds of red tape just to get a 5-minute cameo in a low-budget film. If he were any average college student, he could take the lead role in a blockbuster if a director/producer wanted him. But since he's a college athlete, his opportunity was severely narrow and limited.
And all the while, the schools, Nike, and EA Sports are making millions off of these players through jersey and video game sales. This has always been an issue that's gotten under my skin. I'm still against paying players, but there are other ways to make their lives better than just giving them money. Just give them more opportunities that other students are allowed to have.