The HN needs a frontal lobotomy.

JonDMiller said:
There was another time, when Iowa was 3-3 in 2008, when things were real, real chippy...this was on the heels of the ICPC article from the alleged victim's mom in the Everson-Satterfield case.

When Iowa loses, some lose their minds.
Click to expand...

Jon - if you had asked me after that game if KF was going to be the coach in 2009, I would've said, "no ******* way." I thought it was over for sure.

That's why I've said Shonn Greene saved Kirk's career.
 
JonDMiller said:
There was another time, when Iowa was 3-3 in 2008, when things were real, real chippy...this was on the heels of the ICPC article from the alleged victim's mom in the Everson-Satterfield case.

When Iowa loses, some lose their minds.
Click to expand...

wasn't that right after the MSU loss? or was it NWern....i remember that though.
 
BSpringsteen said:
Jon - if you had asked me after that game if KF was going to be the coach in 2009, I would've said, "no ******* way." I thought it was over for sure.

That's why I've said Shonn Greene saved Kirk's career.
Click to expand...

those were especially dark days. the terrible offseason, two really rough years of football, it really did look like the end. and then shonn showed up and kirk was apparently "convinced" by KOK that stanzi should be the man, and the rest was history.
 
BSpringsteen said:
Jon - if you had asked me after that game if KF was going to be the coach in 2009, I would've said, "no ******* way." I thought it was over for sure.

That's why I've said Shonn Greene saved Kirk's career.
Click to expand...

Greene certainly helped, but that was one of the best statistical defenses in Iowa history.

However, that team had a QB issue for a long time...and if you have QB issues in this offense, you're toast. Heck, even when you DONT have QB issues, you aren't great as the stats have shown
 
JonDMiller said:
Greene certainly helped, but that was one of the best statistical defenses in Iowa history.

However, that team had a QB issue for a long time...and if you have QB issues in this offense, you're toast. Heck, even when you DONT have QB issues, you aren't great as the stats have shown
Click to expand...

Here's to many more..........
 
JonDMiller said:
Greene certainly helped, but that was one of the best statistical defenses in Iowa history.

However, that team had a QB issue for a long time...and if you have QB issues in this offense, you're toast. Heck, even when you DONT have QB issues, you aren't great as the stats have shown
Click to expand...

Man - I get that in Kirk's mind, that the best offense for a team is to not turn the ball over, but I do not understand how Ken O'Keefe still has any kind of job.
 
BSpringsteen said:
Man - I get that in Kirk's mind, that the best offense for a team is to not turn the ball over, but I do not understand how Ken O'Keefe still has any kind of job.
Click to expand...

It's to the point where it's not Ken's fault IMO.

He's either doing what Ferentz's bidding is and takes the heat for it, or he is not a good game caller and is still doing Ferentz's bidding re: formations etc and takes the heat for it,

Either way there is enough evidence, more than enough, to show that Kirk is OK with what is taking place on offense by the very fact that there has not been any changes there.
 
JonDMiller said:
It's to the point where it's not Ken's fault IMO.
Click to expand...

Yeah dude - I get it. I really do. But there are real bonehead moments in the playcalling within the scheme. Those are on Ken. But, it's obvious that he is bulletproof, and when that is the case, it isn't his fault. You're right.
 
aeischeid said:
Compass needs recalibrated IMHO......
Click to expand...

which is why it will be really, really interesting to see what happens with the new DC. if it ends up being same old, same old, we'll finally know its really just what kirk wants. the problem is we've had the same OC and DC for 13 years now, so we have nothing to go off of besides the idea that they're just doing what kirk wants.
 
big10fan said:
which is why it will be really, really interesting to see what happens with the new DC. if it ends up being same old, same old, we'll finally know its really just what kirk wants. the problem is we've had the same OC and DC for 13 years now, so we have nothing to go off of besides the idea that they're just doing what kirk wants.
Click to expand...

Doesn't have to be an EPIC freaking shakedown either........ As far as some direction altering....
 
JonDMiller said:
It's to the point where it's not Ken's fault IMO.

He's either doing what Ferentz's bidding is and takes the heat for it, or he is not a good game caller and is still doing Ferentz's bidding re: formations etc and takes the heat for it,

Either way there is enough evidence, more than enough, to show that Kirk is OK with what is taking place on offense by the very fact that there has not been any changes there.
Click to expand...

Of course. only morans blame KOK for every problem that is Iowa.

who on the staff has a national championship under his belt?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Share this page

Top