NCHawker
Well-Known Member
Interesting reading on the Stanford board. Civil, articulate.
http://thecardboard.org/board/index.php?board=1.0#bot
http://thecardboard.org/board/index.php?board=1.0#bot
The CARDboard
- Thread starter NCHawker
- Start date
HawkeyeWalker
Well-Known Member
I don't usually go to other teams boards, but I spent some time there. Solid discussion. Probably ready 6-7 threads and didnt see a single troll post.
Interesting reading. I would say they have a reasonable amount of optimism. Consensus is that Iowa will have to score 28+ and not turn the ball over to be in the game...that's probably pretty accurate. McCaffrey, Hogan, Galloway will be a tough test.
Go Hawks.
Interesting reading. I would say they have a reasonable amount of optimism. Consensus is that Iowa will have to score 28+ and not turn the ball over to be in the game...that's probably pretty accurate. McCaffrey, Hogan, Galloway will be a tough test.
Go Hawks.
LasVegasHawk
Well-Known Member
Interesting that their board auto corrects "Heisman" to "F Stanford Award". Literally.
Like, I am serious. Haha.
Like, I am serious. Haha.
Ha ha, no joke, these guys do sound pretty cool. Not only that, they have a point. McCaffrey and Henry have about the same RB stats but throw in all-purpose and McCaffrey should have won easily. He's exactly the type of player, that could play any position, that I think of when I think Heisman. Too bad.
judzeehawk
Well-Known Member
I totally agree with you Hwk23. McCaffrey definitely should of won the Heisman. This guy is for real. To bad he didn't get it. The Hawks are going to have trouble keeping him contained.
NCHawker
Well-Known Member
What happens when you type "Notre Dame" or "USC" or "Cal" I think I know...because they are consistent in their references.
I couldn't register - don't know the answers.
