tweeterhawk
Well-Known Member
is not wearing Black and Gold, sorry to say.
Young Mr. Gabbert looks to be the real deal.
Young Mr. Gabbert looks to be the real deal.
Every QB looks like the real deal against Iowa.is not wearing Black and Gold, sorry to say.
Young Mr. Gabbert looks to be the real deal.
It’s likely because we aren’t used to seeing what one looks likeEvery QB looks like the real deal against Iowa.
The camp practice sessions cause this; then, when the defense actually encounters one in a real game, that opposing QB looks like Tom Brady. New year, same script.It’s likely because we aren’t used to seeing what one looks like
is not wearing Black and Gold, sorry to say.
Young Mr. Gabbert looks to be the real deal.
That ball was a wounded duck, late and under-thrown. A better pass would have been caught in stride and an automatic 6.If he didn't have to wait for the ball
Would have been a TD
It's great, but some people are unhappy unless he has a 100% completion rate with 7 TDs.21-30 (70%) for 252 with 3tds and 0 ints seems damn good to me.
Numbers are OK but Stanley doesn’t have the fundamentals like Gabbert. Gabbert had perfect touch on the bubble screen, Stanley not. Stanley can’t throw with accuracy downfield; Gabbert was deadly. Gabbert has much more zip and accuracy getting the ball to the receiver.21-30 (70%) for 252 with 3tds and 0 ints seems damn good to me.
He threw 2 (edit, 4 but Smith couldn't get inbounds on one and Tracy lost track of the other) beautiful fades and hit ISM on the numbers on a busted-play scramble. He was fine.Numbers are OK but Stanley doesn’t have the fundamentals like Gabbert. Gabbert had perfect touch on the bubble screen, Stanley not. Stanley can’t throw with accuracy downfield; Gabbert was deadly. Gabbert has much more zip and accuracy getting the ball to the receiver.
That said, I will credit Nate for some big scrambles to keep drives alive.
If Gabbert stays healthy and improves each year, there’ll be no comparison by the time he’s a senior.
It's great, but some people are unhappy unless he has a 100% completion rate with 7 TDs.
Numbers are OK but Stanley doesn’t have the fundamentals like Gabbert. Gabbert had perfect touch on the bubble screen, Stanley not. Stanley can’t throw with accuracy downfield; Gabbert was deadly. Gabbert has much more zip and accuracy getting the ball to the receiver.
That said, I will credit Nate for some big scrambles to keep drives alive.
If Gabbert stays healthy and improves each year, there’ll be no comparison by the time he’s a senior.
Really he only had one bad throw tonight when Smith beat his man badly and Nate threw it too far and to the outside when the route was clearly inside and he got Smith turned around.
He had a couple nice throws downfield that WRs need to make plays on.
And credit to the Miami DBs. They held a couple times and took 15 yard PIs instead of getting beat for 50 yard bombs. That's just being smart.
Didnt we have a big gain on a screen?Numbers are OK but Stanley doesn’t have the fundamentals like Gabbert. Gabbert had perfect touch on the bubble screen, Stanley not. Stanley can’t throw with accuracy downfield; Gabbert was deadly. Gabbert has much more zip and accuracy getting the ball to the receiver.
That said, I will credit Nate for some big scrambles to keep drives alive.
If Gabbert stays healthy and improves each year, there’ll be no comparison by the time he’s a senior.
Sargent in the 1st, but the vast majority of his yardage was downfield passes.Didnt we have a big gain on a screen?