Should the St. Louis Cards sign Albert Pujols, or risk losing him to the Cubs?

Don't you think thier pitching might have been improved if they had been able to sign 3 starters for 10 million per year, or perhaps two starters for 10mil and 2 bullpen guys who could get outs for 5 million per? Part of the reason thier pitching was abysmal was because much of thier money was tied up with one player.

I'm not saying they could have 3/5 of an all star rotation for that but 20 million in 2011 would get you Ted Lilly and Carl Pavano. Those are two pretty solid inning eating starters.

Losing pujols and signing talents like those would not help the cards, but I see what u are saying. The cards already have good enough starters, they need a little bullpen help and offense. Losing pujols would cut their offense in half and I'm not sure they could find 3 10 mil guys that would put up his production. The cards need to understand that he could go down as one of the top 3 players ever. That will always be able to make them money when they get tk market that. Say thanks and pay the man.

And that's my rant. And no, I probably should not be anywhere close to anyone who makes these decisions. :)
 
I'm a Braves fan, and I honestly don't want him for that much money. That's a crazy amount of money he wants(if true). You can field a WS caliber team for 300 total.
 
Your paying Texiera a gazillion dollars to play 1st base.......Why would you pay Pujols 30 mil a year to DH? Even the Yanks have to have some fiscal responsibility.

Maybe they just trade Tex and some prospects to the Cardinals after the season? Not the craziest idea.
 
Your paying Texiera a gazillion dollars to play 1st base.......Why would you pay Pujols 30 mil a year to DH? Even the Yanks have to have some fiscal responsibility.

First off, Pujols is a WAY better 1st baseman and texiera would move to DH. But as you know, it wouldn't happen.
 

Latest posts

Top