For some reason I just can't read the drivel he writes. He lost me in the 2nd paragraph with "Each fall Saturday, 80,000 people crowd into stadiums to watch 19-and-20-year-olds inflict permanent physical and neurological harm upon each other. These athletes play for base-level college tuition and the very, very slim chance that they’ll someday play football professionally." No we don't or most anybody. We don't go to watch the young men inflict pain on each other.
He does the worst no no when writing articles and that is to tell people what they do or do not do. You can't just put everybody in one pool and say you do this. It's not true. Then to go on to touch on the subject of paying players...... blah blah blah. Obviously, by reading the 2nd paragraph, most can tell the agenda you were trying to splur.
Here's this gem. "College football fans suffer from permanent separation anxiety." Again, not true. Quit putting all fans in one pool. I don't. Many don't as we understand it and are used to it. Yes, maybe when I was like 10 I'd think the team was doomed because so and so left, but most sensible fans understand players are only temporarily there. Maybe you should state "Some college fans................".
I could probably pull out more if I actually read the entire article. I only saw the 2nd line as was the first line in a paragraph when browsing.