BigD
Well-Known Member
I know people don't like it when I question certain assumptions. So I am sorry, but is there really significant proof that the staff is excellent at developing talent? I think it is a reasonable assumption, but I am not sure any one player's development was all that significant. In fact, some players could have regressed from the beginning of the year and prior years. Gatens and May had both been on the all-frosh team and Gatens was HM last year. Neither had league honors this year. I know people like to point to Archie and Brommer as 2 developed players, but Brommer was by far the most productive and he averaged 3.1 pts and 2.4 R's a game.
Again, I am not saying this staff is bad at developing players, I just wonder if it an absolute given at this point.
I thought Cartwright and Basabe both made great strides during the year.