ssckelley
Well-Known Member
Again, I am not buying that academic responsibilities part, at all.
Logistical preparations for bowl games would not be a consideration if THESE WEREN'T BOWL GAMES. The higher seed should be hosting! For the lower-seed, it is just like any other road game.
Physically heal and practice new strategies? Maybe if you have earned a bye. But otherwise, when is that ever a thing that exists between the regular season and a post-season?
I think the whole delay is so that they can tie these playoffs into this legacy notion of New Years Day bowl games.
And for teams like Iowa that aren't part of the CFP, I just don't know why bowls still exist. I suggested last year that they replace bowls with an exhibition game at the end of spring ball. I think that makes a lot more sense, and it would allow teams to showcase their rising underclassmen and portal acquisitions.
I just knew you would pick on that part, it's how I did my google search so feel free to do your own. To say academics plays no part in the scheduling for post season (CFP & Bowls) is silly, at most only 2% of of D1 football players go pro so for many that college degree is important. Finals week is crazy for student athletes and keep in mind this also impacts the HMB and Cheer/Dance squads, who also attend these post season games.
I doubt Bowl games has any impact on the how they are scheduling the CFP. Don't like Bowl games then don't go or don't watch them. I'll be in Florida (hopefully) enjoying the warm weather.