NorthKCHawk
Well-Known Member
Fry, you and I have debated these issues for years now and I actually think we digest these issues with more similarities than differences. In my view, you are the canary in the coal mine. An ardent fan that is losing interest because of the radical changes to the sport that are making it different than what made you fall in love with it. Me too.I'm actually starting to lose interest for lots of reasons. The first is that I just have things to do that bring me just as much joy as Hawkeye football, and I can't justify the amount of time and money it takes to go to games with what KF has done to the program with his son and his stubbornness to cut bait. Driving 11 hours round trip and paying for a motel, gas, food, etc isn't as fun anymore as it was a few years ago. There's just no excitement anymore, and I've given it more than a fair chance. KF has taken the Saturday morning electricity out of the air in Iowa City with what he's done trying to make Brian the president elect. We'll see how this year goes but I won't be at more than maybe one game. I have plenty in the fall to keep me busy with my weekends free.
The other big reason is free transfers. It's not fun to me to follow the sport because everyone can leave willy nilly, so it takes some of the fandom out of it for me. To be clear, I am not against transferring or NIL in any way. I think it's totally fine and athletes deserve the money. When I say I'm out and that I don't like it so it makes me less interested, that's me moving along on my own and not decrying what's going on or saying there needs to be a change. I'll consume what's interesting to me, and pass on what isn't. If college football gets to the point where it isn't fun to watch (for me), I'll just walk away. What I won't do is come on a message board and bitch about how kids are entitled and don't deserve to get paid or transfer, and give 20 bullshit reasons why they need to change the rules to restrict kids I've never met and have no stake in. Not aiming that at you, btw, I'm aiming at people who do that stuff...of which there are plenty here.
The answer is to keep what is right about it, while making the necessary changes to get a piece of the pie to the players. There has to be a path where the players get scholarships, have to go to school and get passable grades, be 18-22 type age, and not transfer 5 times in three years. Those things are fundamental to the game, and must not change (in the case of transfers, go back to the original rule limiting transfers).
The transfer rule can be solved by contract. You want to get paid? Well, sign a contract and follow employment rules set in the contract like any other job.
The scary thing for me is Title IX. If Congress does not step in, then I think the most obvious solution is that the money has to flow through a third party. TV sends money directly to a management company responsible for running Iowa football, who then pays the kids directly, so it is not the University paying the boys and not the girls. Its a mess, it would be challenged, but its a solution. But, my fear is that this is the first step in "decoupling" Iowa football from the University, such that again, it is just minor league football players who are not associated with learning and the school. Don't love that direction, but it may be where things are forced if Congress does not act.