Something has been bugging me about college football for years. When I was a kid, not everyone that played football lifted weights. Some guys were big, sure, but they weren't monsters. If you look at even an average college team's raster now, all the kids are monsters. The height and weight ratios reported for players are absolutely off of the charts.
Something few people know about is Fat Free Mass Index. It measures your height to weight ratio. In https://journals.lww.com/cjsportsme...ee_Mass_Index_in_Users_and_Nonusers_of.3.aspx - the ffmi of bodybuilders, some of them admitted steroid users, some clean, demonstrated that the upper limit adjusted FFMI of non-steroid users was 25.0. Over 25.0, nearly everyone was an admitted steroid user.
In a study of NCAA Div 1 and Div 2 football players last year, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/27930454/, 26.4% of ncaa athletes tested above this limit. It was especially prevalent among offensive and defensive linemen. The Division 1 players were more likely to be above the limit than the Division 2 players.
The scientific evidence is available on every media guide to the teams. Performance enhancement is probably prevalent and widespread in college football. No, Iowa and Iowa State aren't immune. You can do the calculations yourself.
Of course, the science could be inaccurate. Football players are elite athletes and maybe moreso than Mr. America winners and thus will have more muscle. It's pretty clear that no offensive lineman has the physique of Ronnie Coleman or Arnold Schwarzenegger - their bodyfat is too high. But, with current science it appears that there's more to college football conditioning than nutrition and weight lifting.
I'm really surprised that it hasn't been a scandal yet. It's coming though.
Something few people know about is Fat Free Mass Index. It measures your height to weight ratio. In https://journals.lww.com/cjsportsme...ee_Mass_Index_in_Users_and_Nonusers_of.3.aspx - the ffmi of bodybuilders, some of them admitted steroid users, some clean, demonstrated that the upper limit adjusted FFMI of non-steroid users was 25.0. Over 25.0, nearly everyone was an admitted steroid user.
In a study of NCAA Div 1 and Div 2 football players last year, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/27930454/, 26.4% of ncaa athletes tested above this limit. It was especially prevalent among offensive and defensive linemen. The Division 1 players were more likely to be above the limit than the Division 2 players.
The scientific evidence is available on every media guide to the teams. Performance enhancement is probably prevalent and widespread in college football. No, Iowa and Iowa State aren't immune. You can do the calculations yourself.
Of course, the science could be inaccurate. Football players are elite athletes and maybe moreso than Mr. America winners and thus will have more muscle. It's pretty clear that no offensive lineman has the physique of Ronnie Coleman or Arnold Schwarzenegger - their bodyfat is too high. But, with current science it appears that there's more to college football conditioning than nutrition and weight lifting.
I'm really surprised that it hasn't been a scandal yet. It's coming though.