I have no sympathy for PSU and think they should of been given the death penalty. Makes me sick to think of ever playing there again.
Apparently you're just ignoring the fact that everyone involved in the cover up was fired and is either dead, in jail, or facing a grand jury indictment? That's not much of a deterrent compared to a vacated Alamo Bowl win I know, but it's still something.
No, none of those are institutional penalties. The $60 million in penalties and loss of scholarships are institutional penalties. Apparently, it's a tough concept for you to grasp. Nobody cares about the vacated wins, not my idea.
Yep, nothing fits the crime of covering up a serial child rapist like losing a few football scholarships.
Starting to get the feeling HawkeyeMike is a PSU apologist. Based on what I've seen in the last couple posts I'm starting to think you're absolutely right. Since all the individuals have been let go or dealt with, its only fair that PSU be reimbursed for all these hardships they've had to undergo. I mean all the athletic department has ever done is hurt the reputation of the University and drain them financially. I think we should give them all the money back plus some and give them some extra scholarships.
Nothing justifies a university's cover up of serial child rapist like losing a few football scholarships so its only fair to reward the University for its exceptional job of looking the other way.
There has to be penalties at the institutional level. PSU is being punished for the cover-up of a crime, not the crime itself. If there's no penalty, there's no deterrent. For example, they could hire a guy that's most likely to bend and break the rules and then just fire him if he gets caught. Rinse and repeat.
I don't think there's much deterrent effect, if any at all. No one is going to make a hiring decision based on the potential for a $60M fine for covering up a sex crime.
I think it's much simpler, people were outraged and the NCAA was worried about backlash and did some CYA even though it made no logical sense. Outrage does not typically lead to rational decisions and that's what we had here, imo.
Are you kidding? People should be outraged. It's one of the most outrageous cover-ups in history. Since they can't burn the place to the ground, penalties will have to do. Not a single person has been punished for the cover-up yet and the man who made everything possible, Joe Paterno, is dead.
People can be outraged, but making decisions based on outrage very rarely leads to a rational outcome. People are still outraged at Penn St. and even outraged that some penalties have been reduced, but without Googling they likely have no idea of the legal status of the administrators involved in the cover-up. That would indicate to me that people still aren't thinking clearly about this.
Penn State sanctions were revised for good behavior. Isn't good behavior the minimum standard we should be held to. Good behavior should be demanded not rewarded. What the NCAA did is a slap in the face to each of the victims. You can punish the actions of the school. Reduction of scholarships hurts the people who would go to Penn State who had nothing to do with the cover-up. In my opinion Penn State should have had to take the money they would have spent on scholarships and provided scholarships at smaller schools who can't provide scholarships for athletes and students.