It means they are trolling or have run out of any logical arguments.
It means they are trolling or have run out of any logical arguments.
So the game has not passed him by...he was just never good in the first place?Whose running out of arguments? Every game Kirk gives new very logical arguments.Though they are still the same old mistakes I mean arguments Kirk just keeps making them. Same arguments different staff. Same arguments different players. Same mistakes same kirk.
No the game hasnt passed kirk by. Norm retired. KOK got sick of being the whipping boy. Game day coaching and clock skills are the same. Maybe if Kirk can pull in a Banks or a Greene type players then Kirks offense will work.
So the game has not passed him by...he was just never good in the first place?
Oh, you're precious!
except that is what hok fans said about norm (game passed by) and of course Keefe took took the O out of Iowa's offense.....i agree about what you say about keefe though - he was the whipping boy. iowa fan is sad.
So the game has not passed him by...he was just never good in the first place?
Oh, you're precious!
So let me guess... if the Iowa program does indeed start moving back in the right direction then tweedle-dum and tweedle-dee here will claim it's all because of Greg Davis, Phil Parker, and the other new coaches. It will have nothing to do with the guy in charge LOL. That will be their excuse to justify their beliefs. Must be an interesting way to live life inside of a sound booth where the only opinion you'll consider accurate is your own. Nevermind how the professionals feel about KF. They don't know what they are talking about.
No the game hasnt passed kirk by. Norm retired. KOK got sick of being the whipping boy. Game day coaching and clock skills are the same. Maybe if Kirk can pull in a Banks or a Greene type players then Kirks offense will work.
2009 disagrees with your statement.
So he gets no credit for recruiting Stanzi or anyone else? You seem to have the deck stacked against Kirk pretty hard, since you've clearly laid out that anything bad that happens is because of his inability to coach, but anything good that happens is because of the actions of someone else.Are you talking about the year that Iowa had Ricky Stanzi and two of the best wrs in Iowa history? How many players from that defense are in the NFL? Who was the OC? Who was the DC?
So he gets no credit for recruiting Stanzi or anyone else? You seem to have the deck stacked against Kirk pretty hard, since you've clearly laid out that anything bad that happens is because of his inability to coach, but anything good that happens is because of the actions of someone else.
It makes it very, very difficult to take anything you say in this area even slightly seriously, which is about all I gave you to begin with.
Are you talking about the year that Iowa had Ricky Stanzi and two of the best wrs in Iowa history? How many players from that defense are in the NFL? Who was the OC? Who was the DC?
So let me guess... if the Iowa program does indeed start moving back in the right direction then tweedle-dum and tweedle-dee here will claim it's all because of Greg Davis, Phil Parker, and the other new coaches. It will have nothing to do with the guy in charge LOL. That will be their excuse to justify their beliefs. Must be an interesting way to live life inside of a sound booth where the only opinion you'll consider accurate is your own. Nevermind how the professionals feel about KF. They don't know what they are talking about.
Are you talking about the year that Iowa had Ricky Stanzi and two of the best wrs in Iowa history? How many players from that defense are in the NFL? Who was the OC? Who was the DC?