Oklahoma St > Iowa b/c of Offense

ha. I love how over-emotional know-nothings react. Facts are we consistently underachieve on offense. Can't say we don't have the horses. Adapt or die.

Interestingly, I noted that Bud Foster visited Iowa after the Orange Bowl win as VT sought to improve against GT. They played well Thurs night.

Pretty normative for coaching staffs to do their own "continuing education", visiting with other staffs to learn new schemes/methods/etc.

I am saying Iowa needs this on O. Hard to see how that is arguable.
 
ha. I love how over-emotional know-nothings react. Facts are we consistently underachieve on offense. Can't say we don't have the horses. Adapt or die.

Dude, your head is so far up there if you think we have elite offensive personnel. I mean get freaking real. They are not bad, but they are not the juggernaut you imagine in your head. It's like the players IRL are not scoring 60 points a game like you do on Playstation, so it must be the coaches fault.
 
Are you for serious? Multiple 15 reception games? I seriously wonder about some of you people.
I bet if you looked up the best receiver on any team in college football they would have multiple 15 reception games. He is the BEST receiver Iowa has Ever has. How is that a stupid statement?

just because you can do that on the ncaa video game doesn't mean mcnutt should be doing it on the field. the fact you don't understand why its a stupid statement says volumes really.
 
Let's look at the leading BCS level receivers this season:

Ryan Broyles: 1157 yards, 0 15 reception games.
Robert Woods: 1121 yards, 1 15 reception game
Keenan Allen: 1047 yards, 0 15 reception games
Justin Blackmon: 1039 yards, 0 15 reception games
AJ Jenkins: 1030 yards, 0 15 reception games
Chris Given: 985 yards, 0 15 reception games

Anyone detecting a pattern here?
 
Targeting one player on offense repeatedly is generally a bad idea. Good defenses will pretty much always shut down an unbalanced offense.
 
Dude, your head is so far up there if you think we have elite offensive personnel. I mean get freaking real. They are not bad, but they are not the juggernaut you imagine in your head. It's like the players IRL are not scoring 60 points a game like you do on Playstation, so it must be the coaches fault.

dude, learn about the game of football and then come back to me. We need better offensive coaching. Based on your posts you know jack-sh$* about football.
 
@MisterWinky, you know jack sh!t about football. Iowas best chance is playing balanced football. We usually have a chance to win in every game. We are fortunate as fans, but idiots and flamers are what make it seem worse that it actually is!
 
Iowa did go no-huddle several times today.

Did you happen to see how that worked out?


if it takes 30 seconds to get the play off, i don't much consider that no-huddle. They have done absolutely nothing like they did in the pittsburgh game the rest of this year. To say that wasn't successful isn't correct. We absolutely will not change anything, and it looks like iowa basketball of the 90's. Some people enjoy that, and some don't. At least that was somewhat exciting. I just don't find this exciting to watch. 20-40 plays of up the middle or stretch plays work fine against weak teams, but not against better dlines. A quicker running back might break 1 or 2 of those runs, but we won't play a running back with any speed.
 
Let's look at the leading BCS level receivers this season:

Ryan Broyles: 1157 yards, 0 15 reception games.
Robert Woods: 1121 yards, 1 15 reception game
Keenan Allen: 1047 yards, 0 15 reception games
Justin Blackmon: 1039 yards, 0 15 reception games
AJ Jenkins: 1030 yards, 0 15 reception games
Chris Given: 985 yards, 0 15 reception games

Anyone detecting a pattern here?

So these guys are all the best receivers in the history of their teams right? If not it is not relevant to what i said
 
just because you can do that on the ncaa video game doesn't mean mcnutt should be doing it on the field. the fact you don't understand why its a stupid statement says volumes really.

I'm not sure if u can do that in a video game or not. The last football game i played was tecmo bowl. You can definitely argue that 15 is to high but given he is the best receiver we ever had it is not so high that it makes the comment stupid
 
So these guys are all the best receivers in the history of their teams right? If not it is not relevant to what i said

No, but some of them are better than mcnutt, and if they can't consistently catch 15 balls a game how do you expect mcnutt too? You can't seriously be this dense.
 
No, but some of them are better than mcnutt, and if they can't consistently catch 15 balls a game how do you expect mcnutt too? You can't seriously be this dense.

Consistently? No that would be dense. But it would take 2 games to do what i said. Like i said, you can argue that 15 is to high but to say it's so high that the statement is stupid is very dense
 
Consistently? No that would be dense. But it would take 2 games to do what i said. Like i said, you can argue that 15 is to high but to say it's so high that the statement is stupid is very dense

You're hopeless. Some people need to learn to give up on an argument when they've been proven wrong.

Edit: You're on the right track.
 
Can we settle for 13? I won't drop to 12
Jesus man, give it up. Just googled Jerry Rice, ever heard of him? His highest season receptions per game average was 7.6! Do you realize how stupid you sound? Just tryin to back you off the ledge.;)
 
Classic argument, MisterWinky.

Give the coaches blame when you make the case they aren't doing a good job, but then, when something good is done by the team you don't give the staff credit. Therefore, according to you, they can only get credit for failure.

Classic! You make an argument and you frame the rules so you automatically win the argument.
 

Latest posts

Top