GravyJones
Well-Known Member
Why is there something "wrong" with a kid if he's not rated 4-stars by rivals or scout or recruited by another perceived national powerhouse?
Why is there something "wrong" with a kid if he's not rated 4-stars by rivals or scout or recruited by another perceived national powerhouse?
Yes we realize what the OP is saying. And you repeating it doesn't make it less silly. Scholarships ARE NOT handed out based on stats alone. Kirk, doesn't hand out scholarships based on who else offers. Clark, Greenway, Sanders, Yanda, Nelson, Myers, Reisner, Considine, Babineaux, Kasper, etc. Go look up their offer list and ponder for a while.I think what the OP is saying his how does a kid that is as well built as him who put up over 1000 yards as a junior and 1700 as a senior not get more high major offers. That is what he is confused about. I understand this wasn't one of the big football factories but still...how does he get overlooked with those stats. Was this against 7 on 7 competition?
I have rarely seen a highschool WR with over 2700 yards in his last two years.
Yes we realize what the OP is saying. And you repeating it doesn't make it less silly. Scholarships ARE NOT handed out based on stats alone. Kirk, doesn't hand out scholarships based on who else offers. Clark, Greenway, Sanders, Yanda, Nelson, Myers, Reisner, Considine, Babineaux, Kasper, etc. Go look up their offer list and ponder for a while.
Yes we realize what the OP is saying. And you repeating it doesn't make it less silly. Scholarships ARE NOT handed out based on stats alone. Kirk, doesn't hand out scholarships based on who else offers. Clark, Greenway, Sanders, Yanda, Nelson, Myers, Reisner, Considine, Babineaux, Kasper, etc. Go look up their offer list and ponder for a while.
You think every well-behaved kid in texas with size and stats has several BCS offers? Would you like to make a bet on that?A kid who has these kinds of measurables and those kinds of stats, in Texas, typically would have several big offers (one would assume, anyway). The fact that he doesn't makes the OP's question relatively fair. Is he considered way too slow? Does he have some kind of character red flag that scared teams off? I'm not saying I think he does. You just don't usually have a player like this out of Texas just fall into your lap.
Agreed. Often it feels like two types of posters in Hawkdom.I love to read the posts from fellow Hawk fans. Always questioning everything and never happy. There are kids in Florida, California and Texas that will get overlooked because of shear numbers. Why is there something wrong? Good lord, if we get a kid, he must be weak, if we don't get a kid, we wonder why he didn't choose us. If we win by 10 it should have been 20. If our BB coach rants, whats wrong with him? If our BB coach didn't rant, he must not care. I could go on all day. Cabin fever? Too much time on your hands? Sanctamonious? Self-rightous? I have always wondered. If this kid has issues, which no one has said he does, he won't be here long. If he is the real deal, he will be playing on sundays some day. Lets sit back and watch what happens.
You think every well-behaved kid in texas with size and stats has several BCS offers? Would you like to make a bet on that?
HAWKCENTRAL
As for the 6-4, 190-pound Hillyer, he burst on the recruiting scene after catching 18 touchdown passes and finishing with 1,648 receiving yards as a senior this fall. He reportedly had scholarships offers from Colorado State and Texas-El Paso but was starting to attract interest from bigger schools such as Texas A&M. . . . and this from the same article . . .
“Iowa is one of the top three schools in the country for evaluating and then developing (players),” Lemming said. “So if they like him, that’s means he’s going to be good.”
Lemming pointed out that Iowa was the first school to offer receiver Michael Crabtree a scholarship. Crabtree signed with Texas Tech and became a consensus all-America receiver. He now plays for the San Francisco 49ers.