IATrainMaster101
Well-Known Member
At 17-3, Kirk felt that was plenty good chance to win with his defense against the team they were playing. It's not like they were not trying on offense, and if they hadn't gone backwards on first down several times, it would have been a little different. But at that point, they were not going to throw on first down, and risk an incompletion or INT. The clock was Iowa's friend, and running on first down means it moves...of course, PSU made some adjustments and did a good job. Had PSU scored a TD, then Iowa would have altered it's thought process. They didn't, so they didn't
Jon, I'm not suggesting that Iowa wasn't trying on ofense nor am I arguing the approach. My only point of contention is the fine line of risk. To me, even with this stellar defense, it is a greater risk to go so conservative so early vs a quality team, than it is to roll with momentum for another score behind...A. a 5th year qb B. experienced wr's C. a pretty good line and D. A rb that does not turn it over. Our special teams have not been overly special lately but our offense has been very effective when they are playing past page 8 of the playbook.
Not a knock on Kirk's approach, just a varying opinion of where the line of risk vs reward lies.