Yeah, he's got to hire his coaches before he gets recruits. By NOW, I mean a player for this upcoming year. We all hammered Lick for going into a season with only really one freshman PG and a converted shoot first 2 guard. It would look bad if FM went into to his first season in the same situation, with the caveat of his one PG being a soph instead of a frosh. Now, I think the fan base would excuse that situation if FM signed a really strong PG in November.
I am surprised that people think this is so controversial. Seems pretty elementary to me. Also, someone commented about giving FM the benefit of the doubt. Well that benefit goes away with evidence. If he isn't able to come in and make a recruiting splash in his first year, that would be evidence. If he did make a splash, that would be evidence.
I am not saying it is a bad hire. In fact, I have been high on him for the way Siena has played in the tournament for the last three years. However, we all know the one concern is the fact that he has not recruited the Midwest for ten years. We are also not sure if he can get the East Coast kids to come out West. That is where he will experience success or failure. So, if he starts off slower than he did at Siena, it will be a cause for concern. Can you really argue against that point?