New college wrestling rules approved

fulsaasfan

Well-Known Member
The NCAA Oversight Panel has approved new escape, stalling, injury timeout and video review rules.

Playing rules panel approves wrestling recommendations

Escape
The new granting-an-escape rule will take effect before a restart. The offensive wrestler will signal to the referee that he chooses to start in a neutral position. The defensive wrestler is awarded a point, and competition begins in the neutral position.

Injury Timeouts
The first time a non-bleeding injury timeout is called, his opponent will be awarded the choice of position on the restart. The second time a non-bleeding injury timeout is taken; the opponent is awarded a point. A third non-bleeding injury timeout will result in the termination of the match and the opponent is awarded the victory by default.
Video Review
At individual-advancement tournaments, a coach may request a review only of recording points, timing, match results or procedural errors.

Stalling
The panel also approved the new criteria that better define the stalling rule, which should help ensure its consistent enforcement.
The rule will be applied in the following instances:

A wrestler is not permitted to continually back away from the opponent without creating offensive action.
A wrestler near the edge of the mat cannot step out of bounds unless it is to sprawl from an opponent’s takedown attempt or when interlocked. A participant will be called for stalling if he kicks out from a lower leg hold and as a result of this action the defending wrestler goes out of the wrestling area.
A wrestler who flees or attempts to flee the wrestling area as a means of avoiding being scored upon will be called for stalling. The committee considers fleeing as an attempt by a wrestler to avoid wrestling action; thus, it is considered a form of stalling and should be similarly penalized.

Wrestlers, whether on offense or defense, must make an attempt to sustain active wrestling and remain inbounds. Stalling will be called in the following instances:

An offensive wrestler who does not aggressively attempt to break down the opponent will be called for stalling.
Either wrestler pushing his opponent out of bounds to prevent scoring will be cited for stalling.
The offensive wrestler grasping the defensive wrestler’s leg(s) with both hands or arms will be called for stalling, unless such action is designed to break down the opponent for the purpose of securing a fall or to prevent an escape or reversal.
Any wrestler who repeatedly grasps or interlocks his hands around a leg without attempting an offensive move will be called for stalling.
A defensive wrestler must initiate action to escape or reverse the opponent, or he will be called for stalling.
A wrestler who repeatedly applies the legs while in the rear-standing position is stalling.
 


I like the new escape and injury timeout rules, the other two I'm not too sure of. How many video reviews can a coach request per match and is their a set time the review will occur in. I want to find out more on that before judging that one. And for the stalling I don't expect the NEW rules too change how the refs call it, plus it sounds like you can now flee the mat with no real penalty if you haven't been called for stalling yet. I don't like that at all if that is the case.
 


I like the rule changes. Too much stalling going on out there. Hope some of the returning wrestlers work hard this offseason at getting out from bottom.
Im getting excited about next year.....
 


The escape rule will significantly alter David Taylor's strategy.

I don't understand this one:
A participant will be called for stalling if he kicks out from a lower leg hold and as a result of this action the defending wrestler goes out of the wrestling area.
 


I don't understand this one:
A participant will be called for stalling if he kicks out from a lower leg hold and as a result of this action the defending wrestler goes out of the wrestling area.
I can't figure that one out either.
 


It's poorly written, but I think they're talking about the same wrestler. Wouldn't the person trying kick out be the one defending against an offensive move?
 


It's poorly written, but I think they're talking about the same wrestler. Wouldn't the person trying kick out be the one defending against an offensive move?
I think you're right pump. That makes more sense. Sounds like most defensive moves will be considered stalling. I'm interested to see how these new rules are applied.
 


No sir, I don't like this rule. Imagine this situation near the edge of the mat...when hypothetical wrestler A is on the verge of escaping and wrestler B is hanging on A's ankle to keep him from escaping. Wrestler A kicks out of the grip, but as a result lands out of bounds (out of the wrestling area). Sounds to me like he will have to be called for stalling. How can someone be called for stalling when they are just trying to escape? I can't imagine a referee would make this call.
 


it'll be interesting to see how refs view this

i think the video review is going to slow matches down
 


No sir, I don't like this rule. Imagine this situation near the edge of the mat...when hypothetical wrestler A is on the verge of escaping and wrestler B is hanging on A's ankle to keep him from escaping. Wrestler A kicks out of the grip, but as a result lands out of bounds (out of the wrestling area). Sounds to me like he will have to be called for stalling. How can someone be called for stalling when they are just trying to escape? I can't imagine a referee would make this call.


In this case, I wonder if they will make a distinction between defending against a shot (points have not been awarded) and escaping.
 




Top