My thoughts on Iowa-Augustana Exhibition game

Was at the game. The biggest thing I took from the game is how much length our team has. Iowa's zone defense is going to be tough this year. Teams are going to have a hard time getting the ball inside the paint. Guard and wing players did a great job protecting the inside pass and if they did manage a inside pass the low post players made sure that they didn't get an easy look. Teams are going to have to beat us by shooting the 3 ball. The best defensive player on the floor last night was Jarrod Uthoff. Players couldn't get around him or get any decent shots off. He has great length and moves his feet really well for a 6'9'' Forward.
 
How about they continue to call hand checking and Bo Ryan gets a technical every time he makes his ugly Badger face. It would be nice watching 39:59 minutes of basketball a game with no Bo Ryan.
 
As others have stated, the new hand checking rules could cause teams to play more zone and Iowa can be a very good zone defensive team with their length. On offense I can envision lineups with Woody on the court and combinations of Gabe, Aaron and Melsahn winding up in a triangle set. Consider Woody at the ft line with his passing abilities and having Aaron, Gabe and/or Melsahn to pass to down low. All four of these guys need to become proficient at the 15 jumper and Iowa will own the paint on offense.
 
I rewatched the game today and think these new rules are going to make a big difference in a few of the games this year. I think Marble will get to the line consistently once he begins to assert himself, as will White. Our perimeter D needs to gets to have a little bit more lateral quickness. If we have issues with the guards for Augustana then I am worried what Yogi Farrell and Keith Appling will do against our team. Having said that, against those teams we may play quite a bit of zone and force them to hurt us from the outside. I think this was a great game to blow out the cobwebs. All of the things that worried me about this game can easily be fixed by the time we have our first difficult opponent.
 
It was an exhibition game, so some sloppiness should have been expected from the Iowa men's basketball team.

We did see some of that but we also saw some encouraging signs in addition to the main storyline for this year which is going to be the emphasis on the new contact rules. More on that in a bit. First, some thoughts on some of the players we saw. We'll call this The Rundown.

Adam Woodbury: He scored 10 points and had 11 rebounds in 18 minutes. Woodbury should have excelled agains a much smaller Augustana club and he did. He also showed controlled aggressiveness, which was good to see. He'd lower his head and try to swoop to the hoop one year ago, but he was awkward in doing so in some instances. I am not going to say he's gotten rid of all of the akwardness because he is seven-feet tall, but he looked more poised. He also had three assists and has to be one of the best passing big men in the league. He has added some muscle definition to his upper body, too. He's poised for an exponential growth year.

Aaron White: Just what you would expect from White; great effort and production. He scored 16 points in 23 minutes, including his signature 8 of 10 from the free throw line.

Zach McCabe: 16 points and eight rebounds off the bench for the senior in just 17 minutes. THAT is production. He also had three fouls in those 17 minutes. He was 11-12 from the free throw line.

Melsahn Basabe: 8 points in 12 minutes, active and looks good.

Devyn Marble: Only took five shots in the game, was focusing on running the show and knew he didn't have to take over. The only time he did was at the end of the first half where he drove from the top of the key and got to the rim for the bucket at the buzzer.

Mike Gesell: 1 of 6 from the floor, five assists and four turnovers. He'll get better and has the most rust of anyone on the team as he missed the European tour with the busted hand. Well, Uthoff has a lot of game rust too.

Jarrod Uthoff: Speaking of, 6 points in 21 minutes as he gets acclimated. I think this year you will see him go for 14 and 9 one night then just a bucket or two the next night, score 20 another game and so on. I expect inconsistency from him, given that he has never played in a college game before, or one that counts.

Peter Jok: 1-7 from the floor, 0-6 from three-point range. Glad it was an exhibition...a great thing to have one of these games. He can get those first time jitters out of the way and play ball.

Gabe Olaseni: He looked good..hit a half hook in the lane, also nailed a 15-foot jumper and slammed one home on the break while getting out ahead of everyone on another break. 8 points and 8 boards, but just 2-6 from the line.

Josh Oglesby: He did hit one trey, but missed four others.

Iowa was 2-18 from three-point range in this game and let's home that is an aberration this year and not the norm.

Iowa was 39-50 from the free throw line...50 free throw attempts! That is a huge total and possibly near an arena record. With the new emphasis on limiting the muggings that have been taking place in college hoops, the games are supposed to be called much tighter. This one was as the teams combined to commit 52 fouls and attempted 70 free throws. Iowa had those 50 free throw attempts and 56 field goal attempts.

The game wasn't pretty to watch and there was very little flow.

I think the sport needs to be cleaned up. There has been contact allowed in the paint and on ballhandlers that has no place in the sport and has thugged it up. It's made the game tough to watch at times and I am all for taking efforts to bring it back to what it used to be.

That said, it's going to get worse before it gets better, worse in the form of the disruptive nature of the air-tight way they called the game on Sunday. This was common place around the country and it's just gonna be the way it is...that is until we get to the Big Ten regular season and Bo Ryan and Tom Izzo start whining and complaining about it.

It's good Iowa is 11 deep this year because if the game is going to be called this tightly all season long, teams with quality depth will definitely have an advantage, in addition to those teams who can make their free throws.

I would wager more than a few conference titles will be won (or lost) at the free-throw line this year.

Iowa tips things off for real on Friday night.
Woody's line of 10pts, 11rb, and Gabe's of 8 and 8 bode well for the season. 78% FT out of 50 attempts is pretty darn'd good. 2/18 from 3 is not. The offense in general looked really tentative out there. I can't believe they're like that in practice. They did have some great shooting games in Europe. So, I'm putting it down to first showing under the bright lights jitters.

As far as calling games closer, when refs start having consequences for allowing rough games, it will change. Not until then.
 
"That said, it's going to get worse before it gets better, worse in the form of the disruptive nature of the air-tight way they called the game on Sunday. This was common place around the country and it's just gonna be the way it is...that is until we get to the Big Ten regular season and Bo Ryan and Tom Izzo start whining and complaining about it."

This is going to be key to the entire conference season, it seems to me. Ryan and Izzo have made their money off hand-checking, mugging style of basketball. If the B1G refs call this consistently tight (remember, we won't have Ed Hightower to kick around anymore but we still have Ted Valentine and a few others), those two teams and possibly Purdue will be in trouble. If, however, things return to the status quo, Wisconsin and Sparty will have an 8-10 point advantage every game simply due to B1G officiating. Why do I expect the latter?

Tom Izzo, Matt Painter, Thad Matta and Bo Ryan and 4 of the most successful coaches in the league and certainly some of the most successful in the country. Year after year. I think fans tend to get frustrated by good defensive teams and ASSUME that if their favorite team isn't scoring then the other team must be "hacking" them. I just don't see the evidence to support it.

Aaron Craft for example plays POSITION defense. I only see him lunge at the ball if the offensive player hangs it out to dry. He's one of the smartest guards in the game. Do you honestly think that a player like that won't adjust? Izzo, Painter, Ryan and Matta didn't get to be as successful as they are by being stupid. They'll adjust as well. MSU wins the league just like they were expected to prior to the rule changes, that's my opinion. They'll adjust and Izzo is smart.

I personally don't care if the game is called tight OR loose. I just want one thing: consistency.
 
"That said, it's going to get worse before it gets better, worse in the form of the disruptive nature of the air-tight way they called the game on Sunday. This was common place around the country and it's just gonna be the way it is...that is until we get to the Big Ten regular season and Bo Ryan and Tom Izzo start whining and complaining about it."

This is going to be key to the entire conference season, it seems to me. Ryan and Izzo have made their money off hand-checking, mugging style of basketball. If the B1G refs call this consistently tight (remember, we won't have Ed Hightower to kick around anymore but we still have Ted Valentine and a few others), those two teams and possibly Purdue will be in trouble. If, however, things return to the status quo, Wisconsin and Sparty will have an 8-10 point advantage every game simply due to B1G officiating. Why do I expect the latter?


Carver better go bat **** crazy if it has been officiated tight all year long and then when Wisconsin and MSU come to town they let them play like it was last year.
 
I'm not overly concerned about the outside shooting. We shot just as poorly last year, but I think we've improved in other areas (primarily in the paint) and the hand check rules will help us, too. We can still be much better without improved shooting, IMO.

Agree, and i think we will shoot better on top of that.
 
We will shoot better than 11%, but if teams pack it in a tight zone (as everyone seems to think will be the case) our points will need to come out of transition and at the line. I'm pretty convinced we don't have a consistent zone buster or a go to 3 ball in the clutch. Jok may become our best three ball threat, but I am concerned if his defense will allow him to stay on the floor and also wonder how long it will take for him to adjust to college defenses. I'll withhold judgment on our inside game until we play some teams with similar size athletes.

Our depth will help with fouls, but our lack of quickness is going to hurt against good dribble penetration. We may well come out of the Xavier game wondering what happened as they have a good point. I still want to know who our stopper on defense is. I think any advantage we may have had in wearing teams down goes away with the number of fouls that may be called and the number of media timeouts.

There's a ton to love about our Hawks this season, but this is a team with some holes that need filling too. On any given night we can probably compete with most anyone. On an average night I don't know if we can expect to win against the leagues top tier.
 
Tom Izzo, Matt Painter, Thad Matta and Bo Ryan and 4 of the most successful coaches in the league and certainly some of the most successful in the country. Year after year. I think fans tend to get frustrated by good defensive teams and ASSUME that if their favorite team isn't scoring then the other team must be "hacking" them. I just don't see the evidence to support it.

Aaron Craft for example plays POSITION defense. I only see him lunge at the ball if the offensive player hangs it out to dry. He's one of the smartest guards in the game. Do you honestly think that a player like that won't adjust? Izzo, Painter, Ryan and Matta didn't get to be as successful as they are by being stupid. They'll adjust as well. MSU wins the league just like they were expected to prior to the rule changes, that's my opinion. They'll adjust and Izzo is smart.

I personally don't care if the game is called tight OR loose. I just want one thing: consistency.

MSU plays thug basketball and their players will have a big problem with this.
 
MSU plays thug basketball and their players will have a big problem with this.

No they don't. They play tough basketball but not thug basketball. You don't get to that many Final Fours like Izzo has without being able to teach your players how to play and prevent fouling.

Now if you said that MSU had thug players off of the basketball court then I'd agree with you.
 
No they don't. They play tough basketball but not thug basketball. You don't get to that many Final Fours like Izzo has without being able to teach your players how to play and prevent fouling.

Now if you said that MSU had thug players off of the basketball court then I'd agree with you.

Every game they played they had to stop to see if they should kick an MSU player out. Nix was the biggest thug in the bigten. They wont be able to handle the rule.
 
michfight.gif
 
Every game they played they had to stop to see if they should kick an MSU player out. Nix was the biggest thug in the bigten. They wont be able to handle the rule.

Sigh. Seriously? MSU is going to suck from now on? Not gonna happen, no chance. Every team in the country will have to adjust to the new rules. MSU will be called for more fouls at first and so will Iowa.

In fact Nix was fouled a lot offensively in the post last year because he was so big. The new rules would have helped him a lot on offense as he'd be able to operate without guys banging on him so much. IMO he'd be even more effective. He's not on the team this year anyway
 
I know FM wants guys to launch when open, but if the 3 point percentage is abysmal after the first 10 games, I hope he rethinks his green lighting dudes. I know shooters have to shoot themselves out of slumps, but we had far too many empty possessions last season early in the shot clock due to guys launching. Jok and Uthoff can score in other ways, so hopefully they do not become too enamored with the 3 if it's not falling. J
 
No they don't. They play tough basketball but not thug basketball. You don't get to that many Final Fours like Izzo has without being able to teach your players how to play and prevent fouling.

Now if you said that MSU had thug players off of the basketball court then I'd agree with you.

Call it what you will. MSU is one of several schools, and one of the most successful, that push the envelope of how physical a team can be on the court. This trend is what the recent new rule emphasis on hand-checking, etc., is trying to counteract. Can MSU adjust if such rules are rigorously enforced? Their talent would suggest yes. But it would change how Izzo has always coached so we shall see. Note that I'm not trying to bash Izzo. He found a successful formula within the way the game has been reffed and stuck with it. It's the way that formula has spread and how it's affected the game that has the NCAA concerned.
 
Call it what you will. MSU is one of several schools, and one of the most successful, that push the envelope of how physical a team can be on the court. This trend is what the recent new rule emphasis on hand-checking, etc., is trying to counteract. Can MSU adjust if such rules are rigorously enforced? Their talent would suggest yes. But it would change how Izzo has always coached so we shall see. Note that I'm not trying to bash Izzo. He found a successful formula within the way the game has been reffed and stuck with it. It's the way that formula has spread and how it's affected the game that has the NCAA concerned.

You don't think Iowa fouls? Have you seen Adam Woodbury play and what he does on defense? Iowa presses. You can't press without reaching from time to time.

MSU will be more than ok, they'll have to adjust just like every other team
 

Latest posts

Top