Leave it to Illinois to bring European pro-ballers to college basketball
- Thread starter BigD
- Start date
thedukeofearl
Well-Known Member
DAMN
From the article:
llinois doesn’t seem so worried about their relationships with Chicago Public League coaches these days. College basketball rosters are no longer built from nurturing high school recruits over four years. In this era, roster building is a year-to-year proposition, not unlike the way it is in EuroLeague. The Illini have found a market inefficiency by going to Europe and offering top players more money, a better lifestyle, and renewed interest in their NBA hopes. College basketball is an all-new ballgame, and Illinois’ roster proves it.
Seems a bit underhanded
From the article:
llinois doesn’t seem so worried about their relationships with Chicago Public League coaches these days. College basketball rosters are no longer built from nurturing high school recruits over four years. In this era, roster building is a year-to-year proposition, not unlike the way it is in EuroLeague. The Illini have found a market inefficiency by going to Europe and offering top players more money, a better lifestyle, and renewed interest in their NBA hopes. College basketball is an all-new ballgame, and Illinois’ roster proves it.
Seems a bit underhanded
BigD
Well-Known Member
I will take a stab at this one.
High end prostitutes riding on the high school buses after games and using rolled up one hundred dollar bills to light up cigars (edit; ROACH CLIPS) for the four and five star recruits. I am visualizing open bus windows with smoke pouring out the windows as they drive down the street.
Last edited:
Fryowa
Administrator
Hate to break it to you but this is absolute genius. By the way, Underwood shouldn't be vilified for this; he should be praised as being an innovator. This isn't NCAA basketball or football anymore, they are both pro leagues. If you can't come to terms with that it's ok, but it's also time to take up basket weaving or stamp collecting as a hobby. I'll repeat..."college" basketball and football are not college sports anymore. That's a euphemism now. "College" basketball and football are dead. Time to either accept it or move on.
You do whatever you can do under the current rules or you die off, it's as simple as that...and that's what Underwood is doing to survive. In other words, don't hate the player, hate the game. Underwood is playing chess when most other coaches and programs are playing checkers.
I'll also add this...would all of you who are mad at this stop watching Hawkeye basketball if all the sudden BMC had a bunch of 6'10" 250lb NBA prospects from the Baltic region signed to play ball? Hell no you wouldn't.
Yeah the days of landing the Jeff Horners and Dean Olivers who commit their freshman yrs in HS and play at the same college for 4 yrs are long over. Things have just gone to the ultra extreme. If a player plays 3 yrs at once place it'd be surprising. So yeah everything is yr to yr now so programs are figuring out how best to do that. The pressure for those top teams to just shuffle in the most talented guys is off the charts.
If schools like Iowa can recruit well develop guys and KEEP them that can give them a leg up. Team continuity is certainly a thing too on the floor. Having talent is great and all but if they don't jive well as a unit they can still be beat. We've seen lots of examples of that over the yrs
It really is genius. Cause IL is a program that's closer to Iowa in terms of stature and NIL then they are the Dukes/Kentuckys/Kansas type blue bloods. Will it work? Who knows maybe. What's the difference between that and us going to Australia to land punters all the time now? Iowa had a kid just down the road that wanted to punt for us that was like the #1 punter recruit a yr or so ago but we didn't offer him so he went to GA. All because we have a pipeline to Australia.
SwirlinLingerie
Well-Known Member
In the past, could Euro players have any pro experience and be eligible for the NCAA? I'm guessing no, that it is a change, but I don't really know.
trj
Well-Known Member
Yep.
Rutgers is a great example. Dylan Harper and Ace Bailey are projected to be the 2nd and 3rd pick in the NBA draft, and Rutgers was dogshit this year.
Kentucky under Calpari is another example. You could have a roster just with ex-Kentucky guys under Calpari, and they would immediately be a NBA championship contender this year. Yet, Calpari only got one championship during his run at Kentucky.
Continuity isn’t a buzzword, it does matter.
trj
Well-Known Member
I will be up front…I did not read the link @BigD posted yet.
Luka Doncic was this phenom, prodigy type basketball player, who was playing pro ball at 16, 17 years old. So are we saying these dudes have an option to play in college a year or two?
Nikola Jokic is the best player on the planet, and he was a 2nd round pick. So if he was 18 or 19 now, he would definitely be considering college. That is insane to me.
Fry is correct, it is a good move on Underwood’s part. There are no rules on where you get talent, and how you get it. So I am not going to go on some ‘holier than thou’ rant.
Luka Doncic was this phenom, prodigy type basketball player, who was playing pro ball at 16, 17 years old. So are we saying these dudes have an option to play in college a year or two?
Nikola Jokic is the best player on the planet, and he was a 2nd round pick. So if he was 18 or 19 now, he would definitely be considering college. That is insane to me.
Fry is correct, it is a good move on Underwood’s part. There are no rules on where you get talent, and how you get it. So I am not going to go on some ‘holier than thou’ rant.
