Fryowa
Administrator
Rhetorical question.Well I wouldn't have commented had I not read it.
As in, why would anyone take anything serious from that paper?
Rhetorical question.Well I wouldn't have commented had I not read it.
Rhetorical question.
As in, why would anyone take anything serious from that paper?
If our recruiting suffers, it is not due to racial discrimination, but rather to misrepresentation of reality by members of the press and their failure to apologize for their unprofessional behavior.
You're doing that thing again where you respond to me without quoting my post in hopes that I don't see it and don't reply. You've done it twice now in the last day. Grow a pair.Fry. Don’t attack the source. That is lazy rebuttal. Document their failure of journalistic integrity with specific examples of those failures.
Now you can read my mind. Wow. …”hopes that I don’t see it.” Well, that makes no sense. Of course I want you to see it. Otherwise, I wouldn’t bother to post it. I will try to keep track of your requirements for posting.You're doing that thing again where you respond to me without quoting my post in hopes that I don't see it and don't reply. You've done it twice now in the last day. Grow a pair.
Yes.Did I do it right this time?
Yes.
Good stuff, Fry. Thank you for your comments.Yet the Gazette refuses to give accounts of the program to current players or those who played the year before, after the changes Porter wanted were made (which he admits to).
My opinion on any of this doesn't matter because I'm a white guy (and it shouldn't), but even Lomax is telling them to inquire with current players.
The Gazette is looking for a hot expose to get clicks from the SJ crowd. They don't want any input that will interfere with or discount their narrative. What's worse is that their narrative isn't driven by morals, it's driven by wanting clicks and attention.
The Gazette reporters when asked on Twitter about current players? Silence.
Gazette reporters when confronted with twisting words around in KF's email and leaving vital context out? Silence.
Gazette reporters when asked about Lomax and the content of KF's email? Silence and diversion. "I stand by my article" with no explanation of why.
HOW IS SILENCE BY REPORTERS WHEN CONFRONTED WITH THEIR INCONSISTENCIES AND APPARENT BIAS AGAINST IOWA'S FOOTBALL STAFF ANY DIFFERENT THAN KIRK FERENTZ REFUSING TO COMMENT ON THE SITUATION?
Yet the Gazette refuses to give accounts of the program from current players or those who played the year before, after the changes Porter wanted were made (which he admits to).
My opinion on any of this doesn't matter because I'm a white guy (and it shouldn't), but even Lomax is telling them to inquire with current players.
The Gazette is looking for a hot expose to get clicks from the SJ crowd. They don't want any input that will interfere with or discount their narrative. What's worse is that their narrative isn't driven by morals, it's driven by wanting clicks and attention.
The Gazette reporters when asked on Twitter about current players? Silence.
Gazette reporters when confronted with twisting words around in KF's email and leaving vital context out? Silence.
Gazette reporters when asked about Lomax and the content of KF's email? Silence and diversion. "I stand by my article" with no explanation of why.
HOW IS SILENCE BY REPORTERS WHEN CONFRONTED WITH THEIR INCONSISTENCIES AND APPARENT BIAS AGAINST IOWA'S FOOTBALL STAFF ANY DIFFERENT THAN KIRK FERENTZ REFUSING TO COMMENT ON THE SITUATION?
Social Justice.What the "sj" crowd?