Nice little plug for Iowa football during the game talking about the Stoops family, Mark Stoops is the guy I want to have replace KF, we need to get him and soon before the wildcats give him a big contract!
Would he even want to leave an SEC coaching job in which he is building momentum to come to a mediocre big ten team?
A coach from a good Big Ten school left to go coach a bad SEC school.
Iowa is a way better gig than the majority of SEC schools imo. It's suspect deduction, but I'm guessing guys like Biels, or either of the Stoops brothers wouldn't mind being the head guy where they played their college ball.
That is an opinion straight from the eyes of a fan waxing poetically. I can see Mark leaving Kentucky but I am not certain he would come to Iowa.
We have almost nothing going for us. The University does not support athletics, historically bad president, bad AD, in-state media with an axe to grind and fatigued fan base.
That is an opinion straight from the eyes of a fan waxing poetically. I can see Mark leaving Kentucky but I am not certain he would come to Iowa.
We have almost nothing going for us. The University does not support athletics, historically bad president, bad AD, in-state media with an axe to grind and fatigued fan base.
That is an opinion straight from the eyes of a fan waxing poetically. I can see Mark leaving Kentucky but I am not certain he would come to Iowa.
We have almost nothing going for us. The University does not support athletics, historically bad president, bad AD, in-state media with an axe to grind and fatigued fan base.
The truth lies somewhere in the middle.
Iowa does have several advantages that the apologists love to conveniently ignore. We are one of the most profitable athletic departments in the country. We have proven that we are willing to put significant resources into football and pay our coach a nationally competitive wage (KF is currently the 9th highest paid HC in the country according to the USA Today database, more than every SEC coach except for 4: Saban, Miles, Biels, and Tenn's coach). While a major conference, the B1G (specifically the West division) is far easier to have immediate success in than any other major league other than the ACC (and only if you're in the division opposite FSU/Clemson). And most importantly, Iowa fans are ABSURDLY loyal, almost to a fault. Coaching at Iowa with just a very modest level of competence is basically a lifetime gig. There is very little pressure or expectation compared to just about any other decent football school in America.
It is an interesting and compelling argument/discussion.
Are you mad because the women's rowing team doesn't get enough love or something? The football program constantly fluctuates in the top 20 financially, and the facilities are some of the best in the country. The fan base isn't in to games because the product on the field is boring as hell to watch. It's pretty simple, a coach like Biels coming to town would immediately make the football team more enjoyable to watch, and on top of that the team most likely competes for the B1G championship every year because he doesn't coach his teams like a coward.
The truth lies somewhere in the middle.
Iowa is certainly not a better job than "the majority" of the SEC schools, as g11 asserted. LSU, Bama, Auburn, Tennesee, Florida, aTm, and Georgia are all light years ahead of us in terms of prestige, history, resources, recruiting base, etc. That's half the league right there.
Iowa is only "clearly" better than Vanderbilt. You could also argue Kentucky, although they have very good fan support and resources as well, just no level of historical success to speak of.
Arkansas and the Mississippi schools are pretty equal to Iowa in terms of prestige. Missouri and South Carolina are in states with significantly higher populations, but Iowa actually has about 30 more wins all-time than SC and has overall been more successful than Mizzou in the last 35 years (post-Hayden).
Iowa does have several advantages that the apologists love to conveniently ignore. We are one of the most profitable athletic departments in the country. We have proven that we are willing to put significant resources into football and pay our coach a nationally competitive wage (KF is currently the 9th highest paid HC in the country according to the USA Today database, more than every SEC coach except for 4: Saban, Miles, Biels, and Tenn's coach). While a major conference, the B1G (specifically the West division) is far easier to have immediate success in than any other major league other than the ACC (and only if you're in the division opposite FSU/Clemson). And most importantly, Iowa fans are ABSURDLY loyal, almost to a fault. Coaching at Iowa with just a very modest level of competence is basically a lifetime gig. There is very little pressure or expectation compared to just about any other decent football school in America.
It is an interesting and compelling argument/discussion.
This explains the fans right or wrong who support Ferentz no matter what. They think its more important to support the program no matter that direction its in than to think of the potential it could be again under fresh leadership.The truth lies somewhere in the middle.
Iowa is certainly not a better job than "the majority" of the SEC schools, as g11 asserted. LSU, Bama, Auburn, Tennesee, Florida, aTm, and Georgia are all light years ahead of us in terms of prestige, history, resources, recruiting base, etc. That's half the league right there.
Iowa is only "clearly" better than Vanderbilt. You could also argue Kentucky, although they have very good fan support and resources as well, just no level of historical success to speak of.
Arkansas and the Mississippi schools are pretty equal to Iowa in terms of prestige. Missouri and South Carolina are in states with significantly higher populations, but Iowa actually has about 30 more wins all-time than SC and has overall been more successful than Mizzou in the last 35 years (post-Hayden).
Iowa does have several advantages that the apologists love to conveniently ignore. We are one of the most profitable athletic departments in the country. We have proven that we are willing to put significant resources into football and pay our coach a nationally competitive wage (KF is currently the 9th highest paid HC in the country according to the USA Today database, more than every SEC coach except for 4: Saban, Miles, Biels, and Tenn's coach). While a major conference, the B1G (specifically the West division) is far easier to have immediate success in than any other major league other than the ACC (and only if you're in the division opposite FSU/Clemson). And most importantly, Iowa fans are ABSURDLY loyal, almost to a fault. Coaching at Iowa with just a very modest level of competence is basically a lifetime gig. There is very little pressure or expectation compared to just about any other decent football school in America.
It is an interesting and compelling argument/discussion.
the facilities are some of the best in the country.
Link for this or is this just hyperbole?
The listings I see for best facilities in the country top 10 and top 25 do not list Iowa. The B1G schools listed are OSU, Mich, MSU, PSU and Nebby in the top 25.
Was it Dinardo from the BTN last year that said we had some of the worst in the league?
I would very much like a new coach and would be thrilled with Mark Stoops but I think we would end up with a lessor known commodity. The Iowa job is not as highly thought of as our own fans believe. Heck we are 7-9 against our in state rivals who have far less resources and history.
Link for this or is this just hyperbole?
The listings I see for best facilities in the country top 10 and top 25 do not list Iowa. The B1G schools listed are OSU, Mich, MSU, PSU and Nebby in the top 25.
Was it Dinardo from the BTN last year that said we had some of the worst in the league?
I would very much like a new coach and would be thrilled with Mark Stoops but I think we would end up with a lessor known commodity. The Iowa job is not as highly thought of as our own fans believe. Heck we are 7-9 against our in state rivals who have far less resources and history.