whammer33024
Well-Known Member
that wasn't the original argument. the original argument was "is two conference titles in 15 seasons good enough for you?". compared to the rest of the b1g, i'd say yes.
that wasn't the original argument. the original argument was "is two conference titles in 15 seasons good enough for you?". compared to the rest of the b1g, i'd say yes.
Let's get something straight... it was 2 shared titles. KF has not won an outright title in his tenure.
that wasn't the original argument. the original argument was "is two conference titles in 15 seasons good enough for you?". compared to the rest of the b1g, i'd say yes.
Let's get something straight... it was 2 shared titles. KF has not won an outright title in his tenure.
No, it's called picking the numbers that most fit your own argument. I did the same thing to fit my argument.
.
i didn't pick any numbers other than the ones the OP posted. 15 years. iowa has 2 conference titles in those years. whether it was in 99 and 00 doesn't matter. i simply stated we have won 2 conference titles in that timeframe and posted the conference winners during that timeframe.
But he won one...
LOL, I love this argument. We get it you hate KF and want him fired but please stop with this crap. Say we have sucked the last couple of years, the 2010 team vastly under performed based on the talent we had on the roster, etc. but I sure as hell don't remember anyone ******** about those "shared" BT titles the years they happened.
Sure did. And KF has 5 more years to tie or pass him.
Are you sure he has 5 years?
2 conference titles in 15 years (argument made by KF supports) is better than 0 conference titles in the past 8 years (argument made by KF non-supports).
I wasn't calling you out, but the fact still remains that people can "cherry pick" numbers that is it and that is what happened here.
i decided to look at the last 8 years for a frame of reference on what has happened those years.
2005- ohio state
2006- ohio state
2007- ohio state
2008- ohio state
2009- ohio state
2010- michigan state and wisconsin shared
2011- wisconsin
2012- wisconsin(should be said that ohio state was ineligible for postseason play but was undefeated)
so in those 8 years, ohio state won outright 5 times(could be argued 6 if you add 2012). only wisconsin and michigan state have any other championship claim.
that leaves 8 schools(not including nebraska here) that should fire their coaches and burn down their stadiums.
No. Not even close. They havent been regular contenders since 2005. 2009 they contended. 1 year in the past 7, Iowa has been in contention. 1 ******* year
This is the problem. 2 Conference champs in 15 years is acceptable. Not ideal, but acceptable as long as you're competing year in and year out.
I think this is the correct answer...If we won a Big Ten title every 8 years and won 7-9 games every other year I think that would be very solid. Its the years where we absolutely suck with no adjustments or urgency that get everyones panties in a wad
I think this is the correct answer...If we won a Big Ten title every 8 years and won 7-9 games every other year I think that would be very solid. Its the years where we absolutely suck with no adjustments or urgency that get everyones panties in a wad
I wanted to get a feel from the fan base to see how you all feel about this. I keep hearing about how many players that Iowa sends to the NFL and how amazing it is. My opinion is that if sending players to the NFL doesn't translate to better recruits and more wins, then who really cares?
I feel that when it comes down to it, the measuring stick of a great head coach is conference titles. And in 15 seasons, 2 is pretty sub par. Especially considering how loyal the Iowa fan base is to him. Is this good enough for you????