hawkfan340
Well-Known Member
One loss on the road to a decent team doesn't DQ you, but one loss on the road to ISU does.
I love ripping on ISU as much as the next guy, but they were unfortunately decent last year.
One loss on the road to a decent team doesn't DQ you, but one loss on the road to ISU does.
I love ripping on ISU as much as the next guy, but they were unfortunately decent last year.
Parity in college football has grown immensely over the last couple decades. It's getting to be more of an "any given Saturday" type of environment (or any given Friday in this case).
One loss on the road to a decent team doesn't DQ them from the championship game, imo. Every team had at least one loss this year. I would have loved to see them play LSU given LSU earned the right to be there.
Having two teams from the same conference in the CG is like incest. It's detrimental to the species (the sport) because it greatly reduces the overall diversity of the environment. Two teams from the same conference play each other and the vast majority of their opponents are also the same set of teams. Very little diversity leads to very limited data.
It's very hard to draw conclusions from such a set of data. Maybe LSU and Alabama were head and shoulders better. But maybe not. Having OkSt. play would have widened the data set greatly.