Is Ott's application irrelevant?

ColumbusHawk

Well-Known Member
Unless Ott makes an Adrian Peterson like recovery, he probably won't be ready for fall camp. Even if he gets a medical hardship, Ott may not be ready to play until mid-season or later. The rule of thumb is that it takes at least twelve months to recover from major ACL surgery.
 
If he's not ready this season, he could apply for a 6th season, wait for the NCAA to make a decision, and play alongside his son in 2041.
 
The B1G pooh-bahs are making this relevant to our fan base by all their apparent hand-wringing over what to do over his case. You'd think they were considering Ott for the Supreme Court as long as they're taking.
 
Even if he doesn't play a single down next season, it is best for Drew to get to come back. He would get to continue to work with Iowa's trainers on his rehab. He would essentially get to become an extra GA as I am sure that he would continue to spend every second with the team that he could. It would really benefit the young defensive ends to have him mentoring them for another season. So no, it would not be irrelevant.

But this is Drew Ott we are talking about. The young man is tough as nails. He will be ready for fall camp if he is given the opportunity.
 
Unless Ott makes an Adrian Peterson like recovery, he probably won't be ready for fall camp. Even if he gets a medical hardship, Ott may not be ready to play until mid-season or later. The rule of thumb is that it takes at least twelve months to recover from major ACL surgery.

The answer is no. Having a player of his caliber, even for the second half of the year...is huge.

I contend we would have won the B1G Championship if he plays and is healthy.
 
It could be well over 12 months before Ott is back physically to where he was against Ill St. It varies with that type of injury. His big advantage is that he's young and in the physical prime of his life.
 
In a way it would be almost right, at least eligibility wise, to only be able to play after game 6 this fall. In fact there is an argument that is how medical hardship cases should be handled.

If a player missed all games after game 6 due to injury, they get another season where they can play in all games after game 6.

If he gets hurt in game 7, he can come back for all games after game 7.

If a player gets hurt in game 10, he can come back for all games after game 10.

The player and coaches can decide if it is worth it to come back for the number of games he gets.
 
In a way it would be almost right, at least eligibility wise, to only be able to play after game 6 this fall. In fact there is an argument that is how medical hardship cases should be handled.

If a player missed all games after game 6 due to injury, they get another season where they can play in all games after game 6.

If he gets hurt in game 7, he can come back for all games after game 7.

If a player gets hurt in game 10, he can come back for all games after game 10.

The player and coaches can decide if it is worth it to come back for the number of games he gets.

This actually makes a ton of sense and would make things much less subjective. Basically you could simply count number of quarters or halves that weren't/couldn't be played due to injury, and allow that many the following year.

So no, it won't happen.
 
In a way it would be almost right, at least eligibility wise, to only be able to play after game 6 this fall. In fact there is an argument that is how medical hardship cases should be handled.

If a player missed all games after game 6 due to injury, they get another season where they can play in all games after game 6.

If he gets hurt in game 7, he can come back for all games after game 7.

If a player gets hurt in game 10, he can come back for all games after game 10.

The player and coaches can decide if it is worth it to come back for the number of games he gets.

This would be far too logical.
 
In a way it would be almost right, at least eligibility wise, to only be able to play after game 6 this fall. In fact there is an argument that is how medical hardship cases should be handled.

If a player missed all games after game 6 due to injury, they get another season where they can play in all games after game 6.

If he gets hurt in game 7, he can come back for all games after game 7.

If a player gets hurt in game 10, he can come back for all games after game 10.

The player and coaches can decide if it is worth it to come back for the number of games he gets.


That would be a reasonable way to handle major senior injuries if they play more than 30% of their eligibility. It would still have to be a major season ending injury. Senior injuries are just heartbreaking. Every few of years we have someone that ends his football playing because of a badly timed major injury.
 
In a way it would be almost right, at least eligibility wise, to only be able to play after game 6 this fall. In fact there is an argument that is how medical hardship cases should be handled.

If a player missed all games after game 6 due to injury, they get another season where they can play in all games after game 6.

If he gets hurt in game 7, he can come back for all games after game 7.

If a player gets hurt in game 10, he can come back for all games after game 10.

The player and coaches can decide if it is worth it to come back for the number of games he gets.

As others have said, this logical well thought out idea makes far too much sense for the NCAA to adopt.
 
It could be well over 12 months before Ott is back physically to where he was against Ill St. It varies with that type of injury. His big advantage is that he's young and in the physical prime of his life.

If the injury is like Cooper's, Ott may never again play football. I'd just love to examine the medical records submitted to the B1G!
 
Here's how it could be relevant.

After all this time dickin around, Iowa stays quiet and let's the NCAA come out with their decision. If granted, move on. If denied, relentless media blitzkrieg. Ratchet up the court of public opinion to, 1) expose all the hypocrisy, inconsistency and blatant idiocy of the NCAA and 2) keep the attention of college football nation on Iowa as the powder keg of the revolution.

Come this fall, Iowa suits up Ott, anyway. Whadda they gonna do, send the suits to physically stop him from playing? Call out the national guard? Oh, no, they might expunge the games from the records and pretend they never occurred:rolleyes: (except to the 100 of 1000's of fans attending their games and the millions of eyeballs on TV -- every one would be televised -- all supporting the resistance.) Iowa should mock every edict, threat or penalty the NCAA tries to throw at them and just keep playing.

I know this comes with challenges. For starters, we're tasking the Iowa sports marketing and pr departments to have the balls and smarts to pull this off. We also have to get the rest of the B14 in our corner (perhaps with a very lucrative and powerful opportunity for Delany to head up the new governing body after the overthrow.) If I have any say, all you level headed guys in this thread could have a seat at the table to contribute toward the reformation. Your posts already demonstrate more fair and rational decision-making capability than the NCAA has shown in 30 years.

In the end, even if you stand alone, you still have to have the courage to right wrongs and, sometimes, that requires anarchy and revolt to take down a worthless bureaucracy.

What say you Hawkeye Nation? The end of the NCAA is nigh!:eek:
 
Here's how it could be relevant.

After all this time dickin around, Iowa stays quiet and let's the NCAA come out with their decision. If granted, move on. If denied, relentless media blitzkrieg. Ratchet up the court of public opinion to, 1) expose all the hypocrisy, inconsistency and blatant idiocy of the NCAA and 2) keep the attention of college football nation on Iowa as the powder keg of the revolution.

Come this fall, Iowa suits up Ott, anyway. Whadda they gonna do, send the suits to physically stop him from playing? Call out the national guard? Oh, no, they might expunge the games from the records and pretend they never occurred:rolleyes: (except to the 100 of 1000's of fans attending their games and the millions of eyeballs on TV -- every one would be televised -- all supporting the resistance.) Iowa should mock every edict, threat or penalty the NCAA tries to throw at them and just keep playing.

I know this comes with challenges. For starters, we're tasking the Iowa sports marketing and pr departments to have the balls and smarts to pull this off. We also have to get the rest of the B14 in our corner (perhaps with a very lucrative and powerful opportunity for Delany to head up the new governing body after the overthrow.) If I have any say, all you level headed guys in this thread could have a seat at the table to contribute toward the reformation. Your posts already demonstrate more fair and rational decision-making capability than the NCAA has shown in 30 years.

In the end, even if you stand alone, you still have to have the courage to right wrongs and, sometimes, that requires anarchy and revolt to take down a worthless bureaucracy.

What say you Hawkeye Nation? The end of the NCAA is nigh!:eek:

One problem... the B1G makes the decision! If denied, Ott may appeal to the NCAA. However, the NCAA usually just rubber stamps the B1G's decision.
 
5440 Park Place, Rosemont, IL 60018
(847) 696-1010

Appreciate the info, C-bus.

Mr Delaney showed great wisdom in his "willingness to cooperate" and made an announcement the very next day. Glad I could help expedite the process in the right direction.;):cool:
 
Top