Was this post copied and pasted from 2007? 2011? 2012? 2013? Pick a year, any year.I think it definitely hurts the WR position and could effect the QB position in the future if doesn't get righted.
Was this post copied and pasted from 2007? 2011? 2012? 2013? Pick a year, any year.
Based on what, exactly?I think keying on the "pro-style" QB actually benefits Iowa and they almost have to go that route with the type of QB they need.
The last 5 years did nothing to promote WRs wanting to come to Iowa. I was, still am, hopeful that BF will make the offense more interesting such that some of the better WRs see Iowa as a place to play, and maybe get 1 or 2 to come, but there's a long history to overcome. I'm sure it's used against Iowa all the time in the recruiting world. For the current crew, I think there's real potential for some of these young guys. Maybe our expectations were elevated by some of the plays we've seen this year, but the young guys are too inconsistent right now. However, coming into game 8, they need to show consistency and the OC needs to as well.Yea, I know. Lol. My point is that I think it has already affected the WR position. Fortunately for Iowa, they still have up to this point been able to recruit some decently rated QB's. I think keying on the "pro-style" QB actually benefits Iowa and they almost have to go that route with the type of QB they need.
I think it definitely hurts the WR position and could effect the QB position in the future if doesn't get righted.
The articles in the past couple days make it sound like we are stockpiling Alabama type recruits fro 2018 and 2019....don't make me laugh. Don't fall for the "growing pains season" excuse, that we have all heard in regard to our Basketball Program for 25 years. Shouldn't you have just done something great, if you are suddenly making a conscious decision to take a step back to get better?
Based on what, exactly?
The only offenses KF's ever had that could be considered competent had qb's that could make plays running. O-line university needs a guy that can make it harder on a pass-rush.
Based on what, exactly?
The only offenses KF's ever had that could be considered competent had qb's that could make plays running. O-line university needs a guy that can make it harder on a pass-rush.
Chandler got 10 wins, but I don't remember the O being anything too special. They did have Gallery, though, so "qb style" was not critical that year!Nathan Chandler called and said "Hold those horses".
Chandler got 10 wins, but I don't remember the O being anything too special. They did have Gallery, though, so "qb style" was not critical that year! Agree.
As for the "pro style" thing, I agree they're probably better off going for guys that have played that style in h.s. Or at least have played some sort of non-shotgun. Agree.
Your original post said "pro style" QB, which I took as you wanting the strong-armed, immobile "statue". I'm pretty sure these days recruits are classified by the recruiting services as PP (pocket passer) or DT (dual-threat) based more on their skills / projected role (can/do they run well) than on their h.s. system. That was my disagreement w/ you.
As I said before, I think the Hawks would do well to have a guy who could be a legitimate threat to roll-out, qb draw, rpo, etc. If I could set a video-game kind of slider for the position's skills, I'd put it around 70% passer / 30% runner.
Based on what, exactly?
The only offenses KF's ever had that could be considered competent had qb's that could make plays running. O-line university needs a guy that can make it harder on a pass-rush.
What recruiting momentum do you speak of? Rivals has them at #65. And before I get all of the recruiting rankings don't mean anything nonsense, I understand that Iowa only has 13 commitments right now and will improve. But with an early signing period in December, to me this ranking is showing that Iowa has fallen behind.....whether it is the lack of offense, coaching staff....it is a cause for worry.