Iowalaws's Post-Game Analysis: Indiana

It wasn't even just that he feigned blitz and then dropped out at the snap. He feigned a blitz into the non-playside A gap and then pass dropped playside. It's the WR's job to beat the man to the spot where the slant is to be completed; it's the QB's job to make sure the window is open. Zone blitzes and guys dropping after showing blitz constantly make that a tougher read for a QB and Stanley got busted on that play.

It's pretty common in the NFL. I don't see a ton of it in College ball. Either way I don't recall Stanley ever having noticeably encountered it before. So I give him a pass on it. I'm actually glad that Indiana exposed the tendency for us in a victory performance. I bet had Indiana not then we surely would have seen it from PSU in what I expect will be a much tighter game. Hopefully now with the mistake on tape Stanley can avoid that pitfall in the remaining games. That said no matter who you are you're gonna get exposed every now and again.
 
It’s about time OP finally comes around on Stanley. It only took a national player of the week performance, which he did win.
 
Special teams - 1. Kicking/Kick coverage. Recinos has been fine, he's perfect this year on extra points, and when he comes out for a FG, I believe he's going to make it. The fake FG was outstanding, credit is duly given there. The kickoff team has been good this year, I can't recall a big return against them this year.
2. Punting/Punt coverage. Rastetter has been ok, better than last year, and the punt coverage has been good, with exception of the first punt of the year.
3. Kick off return. A couple of near disasters yesterday, but both (fortunately) turned out well. I don't like the fair catch in the field of play, with ISM, he's a threat to take it back - give him the chance to do it, he has set the Hawks up nicely on some of his returns. That should continue. But they do need to be aware of where they are at on the field, a couple of slip ups this week, which isn't good. I'm counting on that not occurring again.
4. Punt return. They have to deal with the Wisconsin game, plainly said, it cost the Hawks that game, but it seems they've learned their lesson since - the downfield blockers, once the ball has hit the turf, sprint to the sidelines. I can only anticipate that they'll continue to do the same. Groneweg seems to be fairly sure handed on fielding punts - I would hate that he starts to second guess himself back there, that's when fielding mistakes begin to occur. I've given up on them trying to block a punt, unless the other team just flat out blows a blocking assignment.

Not great, but not bad, either. A couple of mistakes cost them a game. A couple of mistakes did not.
 
The rule is you can call a fair catch and get a touchback wherever you catch it, even if it's not in the endzone. Indiana did it all game long against us when Recenos' kicks didn't go into the end zone. ISM made a huge error, but it's on his coach. I doubt ISM even knew the rule and certainly wasn't coached up on it.

So, when he loses the ball in the sun and then spots it late and can't actually catch it in the air.... he is supposed to go against his lifetime of playing (where the rules say it has to go into the end zone in the air for a touchback) and in a split second think, "Oh, yeah... there's a rule change this year". He's been playing football for at least 10 years and NOW has to adjust what he knows? I'd say it's the same thing as all the blocking changes they made this year that Kirk has been quite hot about on the sidelines - you can't change years of training (or coaching) in one season.

Personally, I'm glad he picked it up and ran. I do not like the rule where they can fair catch the kickoff and then get it at the 25. I have always liked the kicker who can kickoff high and inside the 5 but not to the goal line as it forced the kick receiver to run but gave the kicking team the best chance to pin the opponent back inside the 20. I get that the rules committee is trying to make the game safer, but kickoff and punt returns can be the most exciting plays of any football game. And most coaches would rather take a guaranteed 1st and 10 on the 25 than any possibility of getting pinned inside the 20 (or the 15) even if the reward is a touchdown.
 
The rule is you can call a fair catch and get a touchback wherever you catch it, even if it's not in the endzone. Indiana did it all game long against us when Recenos' kicks didn't go into the end zone. ISM made a huge error, but it's on his coach. I doubt ISM even knew the rule and certainly wasn't coached up on it.
I know the rule about faircatching a kickoff but he didn’t catch it and he grabbed it before it went in the endzone so he couldn’t take a knee either.
But yeah, you are probably right. The 10 guys that make a good living coaching football have probably never brought it up. I bet they read your weekly thoughts to learn more about what they should coach.
 
1. Stanley - true on most. disagree with the assertion that Stanley was the difference in the wiscy game, but I get your argument.
2. TEs - don't care whose better, we have the two best in the nation, and that's awesome.
3. Which Amani Jones Is It Going to Be - I disagree with pretty much your entire point here. Amani was benched because he was playing horribly, Hockaday came in and shored up the position. Hockaday has been outplaying him, its not a matter of him being in the doghouse, its a matter of him being out played. They've constantly thrown him back in every game. He's a tackle machine, but he's also a guy who needs to learn to be in the right position with the right read more consistently. He didn't come in and immediately get "his spot" in the game this week, because the combination they had in there, including rolling a 4-2-5 hybrid with geno, Gervase, and hooker in the game with hooker playing down, was working.
4. Hesse/Epenesa Debate - Oh what a problem to have.Having a ton of guys who deserve playing time and multiple positions. Think the coaches have done well here.
5. Ferentz Play Calling - There's about 1 drive a game I don't get. Beyond that, bf has been a beast this year.
6. Special Teams Coach Needs to Go - My blind mother knows special teams cost us the wiscy game, and that sucks. Having said that, I listened to Hockenson talk for about 2 minutes yesterday about how bad the sun was in that one end zone and how impossible it made it to see, and how it effected balls thrown and kicked into that end zone. Also heard one of the best special teams guys in the history of the nfl talk about it. So I don't blame the coach on the sideline for a returner going after a ball and then struggling to find it, and trying to find it and make a split second decision with guys coming after him. I thought special teams played good yesterday. And I don't think Lavar needs to be fired. The improvement in the players in their positions, specifically the punter and kickers, makes me think he's doing fine.
7. Talented Defensive Newcomers - Hankins is our best corner, our safeties are awesome. Having said that, love brents, love moss, love turner. the future is bright.
 
So, a couple of individuals make a mistake on special teams plays, so lets fire the coach. Yup. Sure makes sense to me.
 
Amani Jones was a terrible matchup for this team. Iowa ran its D perfectly by bringing Hooker down and Stone replacing him. I think AJ is situational and I loved the D against a spread offense for the first time in forever. Hooker is a stud and gives this team multiple options on D because of it and Iowa can line up with any style very well. This is a dangerous team and soon to be Big10 Champs.
 
I unfortunately couldn't watch the game live.

Was the INT a bone-head decision (aka last week) or one of those things?

It was a smart play by the coach's kid at lb. Read pass pre-snap. Showed cover-2 mike blitz. Backed off into the flat after wr beat his man on an inside move and got the int. Stanley couldn't see him buried behind the line.
 
# 6 - there's been some poor decisions on kick/punt return teams of which he is responsible no doubt but you might want to look at the bigger picture as well. His KO return unit currently ranks #1 in the BIG so far, his KO coverage stats rank # 3, and his punt return unit ranks in the middle of the pack. Also have to give him some degree of credit for our TE unit, no?
 
Nobody has mentioned the amazing fake FG against O$U either. Got to give him credit for that. Fake FG at Minny was a thing of beauty. There have been some hiccups but I think OP is overly harsh. Not to mention many players call him their favorite coach on staff. I'm not saying that's a reason to keep somebody if they are incompetent, but he is a great personality balance to many of the other coaches that is needed on staff.
 
Every week all you hear about is how great and wonderful Haskins is. How many yards and TD's he's got. Just maybe this is all by design leaving Stanley in. Get as many yards and TD's possible to gain the spotlight and turn some WR's heads in our direction. The Hawks have been average for way to many years and needs to improve it's image and gain control of some of the limelight. This playing to win is a whole new thing for the KF era and I'm not going to complain about some last minute sub. Stanley wasn't in any real danger. The Hawks need to keep increasing the talent pool. Anyway when OSU beats a team by 30-40 points they get all kinds of kudos for doing it. Step on the gas and don't look back.
 
special teams are an issue. We need to tighten it up to give us a chance to run the table.

Iowa can win the next 6. I'm serious....they can do it
 
First off, I'm shocked that only one other response has commented on the fact that Stanley played (and was throwing deep passes) at the end of a 26 point drubbing where the game was not in doubt the entire 4th quarter. Isn't that the time we want to get our backups reps and prevent injury to our starters? We have two freshmen QBs dying for a chance to get in there and there is no rational basis for keeping your starter in at that time.

As for the special teams coach, let's remember, LeVar Woods ran last year's special teams unit to perhaps the 116th worst punting unit in college football. While it has moderately improved, our punting unit is now 13th in the Big 10. Our kick and punt returners have a lot of talent and God given ability, but they are not coached up and it's pretty clear they don't even know the rules or best practices (i.e. fair catching on the 3 yard line and not even getting yelled at by the coach about it).

All coaching staffs can improve strive to be better. LeVar has been given a very long rope because he was a former player, but at some point, there are plenty of young, talented, hungry coaches out there who would kill for the opportunity to coach at Iowa. Many of them would be a substantial upgrade when it comes to recruiting abilities, and that is another area where Woods has struggled mightily.
 
First off, I'm shocked that only one other response has commented on the fact that Stanley played (and was throwing deep passes) at the end of a 26 point drubbing where the game was not in doubt the entire 4th quarter. Isn't that the time we want to get our backups reps and prevent injury to our starters? We have two freshmen QBs dying for a chance to get in there and there is no rational basis for keeping your starter in at that time.

As for the special teams coach, let's remember, LeVar Woods ran last year's special teams unit to perhaps the 116th worst punting unit in college football. While it has moderately improved, our punting unit is now 13th in the Big 10. Our kick and punt returners have a lot of talent and God given ability, but they are not coached up and it's pretty clear they don't even know the rules or best practices (i.e. fair catching on the 3 yard line and not even getting yelled at by the coach about it).

All coaching staffs can improve strive to be better. LeVar has been given a very long rope because he was a former player, but at some point, there are plenty of young, talented, hungry coaches out there who would kill for the opportunity to coach at Iowa. Many of them would be a substantial upgrade when it comes to recruiting abilities, and that is another area where Woods has struggled mightily.

Iowa is currently 14th in the B1G in gross, cumulative punt yards. I assume that is the stat you are looking at. Would you like Iowa to move up in that one?

The only punting stat I care about is net average. Iowa is currently 4th in the conference in that.

http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...team/_/stat/punting/sort/netAvgPuntYards/id/5

Last year they were 12th:

http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...t/punting/sort/netAvgPuntYards/year/2017/id/5
 
Now THIS is the offensive output most of us were hoping to see when Greg Davis was sacked. A 41-16 win when the experts in Vegas favored us by just 4 points. A lot to be optimistic about going into next week 5-1 and ranked for the first time in a year.

1. Stanley - what a game! Perhaps Iowa's most improved player from game 1 to game 6. 21/33 for 320 yards and 6 touchdowns. The tds and yardage should not be much of a surprise. However, his improved accuracy and elusiveness shredding tackles were a new wrinkle. With his size, I'd like to see what he could do on some QB draws. If Nate played like this against Wisconsin, we win by 17 points. With all that said, what the @$# was Nate doing still in the game in the last 1:00 of play, randying around chucking deep passes when up by 25 points? Setting aside the fact that he is one big hit away from an injury, that was some Urban Meyer kind or sportsmanship. Also, from a team first perspective, it would have been a great chance to give our backups some much needed game reps. Would be nice if our cupcake media asked this question.

2. TEs - let the debate rage on as to who our best tight end is. Both had 4 catches, TJ for 106 yards and 2 TDs and Fant for 101 and 1 TD. Both had a few drops. TJs pancake block was one for the highlight reel, and Fant extended his touchdown record at Iowa. From what I've seen of both players, my vote goes to TJ. He's got better hands and is the superior blocker. Fant would be our top WR if he split out wide.

3. Which Amani Jones Is It Going to Be - Jones came into the season with the most LB hype from the coaches. He was unceremoniously benched in the first quarter of game 1. Too soon to pull the plug on a guy, one might think? Last week, he was thrust into action due to injury and had 9 tackles in the 2nd half alone, including the biggest hit of the year. So how does he follow up that performance? By being sent back in Kirk's dog house. He only playing a hand full of minutes after serving a 1st half suspension. Not really fair that he's given such a short leash considering coach's pet Bo Bower was allowed to play every down of every game for 3 years, regardless of numerous mistakes. Jones showed last week that he's one of our top 3 LBs, especially with all the injuries.

4. Hesse/Epenesa Debate - Many want to see more playing time for Epenesa. I'm not sure I agree. Hesse was dominant today, with 6 tackles. He doesn't have the flashy sack totals of Epenesa, but he is a tough run stuffer. AJ had just 1 tackle, but it was a bull rush sack that will add to his NFL draft highlight reel. These are complimentary DEs and it's fantastic that Iowa has the luxury of having 3 Big 10 caliber DEs at the same time.

5. Ferentz Play Calling - For the first time this season, I was really happy with the play calling. We threw to set up the run rather than the other way around. There was no running up the middle into 8 men in the box today. The passing game opened up line and allowed Young and Sergent to average 5.5 yards per carry. The more we pass, the better our chances of success. With that said, clock management at the enf of the 1st half was atrocious. We had the ball at mid-field with 40 seconds left and a solid kicker. We run a screen pass for a loss of 1 and burn 30 seconds off the clock. We then gain 10 yards, but there's no time left to do anything.

6. Special Teams Coach Needs to Go - LeVar Woods has been the weak link on the staff for years. He's usually assigned to coach the positions no one else wanted (i.e. co-LB coach one year, TE coach one year, and now special teams). Under Woods, we have seen glaring mental/coaching mistakes on special teams that are unthinkable on other teams. Groenenwig's fair catch on the 3 yard line and the punt bouncing off a blocker already cost us 1 game. Today, Smith Marsette curiously returned a ball from the 1 yard line despite there being a defender on the 3 yardline. Clearly, he did not know that he could fair catch it. Then Groeneweg ran a ball out of the endzone with a defender at the 3 yard line. He got drilled at the 11 yard line, putting us in unacceptably awful field position when he could have simply called a fair catch. The refs bailed us out by flagging Indiana on the play. C'mon, Woods. You are being paid a doctor's salary...do your job or let someone else take it.

7. Talented Defensive Newcomers - How about Geno Stone and Riley Moss stepping in and showing that they belong out there! Combined, they had 11 tackles and an interception, and helped our defense bend but not break. Iowa is deeper at DB than it has been in a decade. Ojemudi-who? He's back to being healthy but I didn't see him out there. May have been passed up?
 
Now THIS is the offensive output most of us were hoping to see when Greg Davis was sacked. A 41-16 win when the experts in Vegas favored us by just 4 points. A lot to be optimistic about going into next week 5-1 and ranked for the first time in a year.

1. Stanley - what a game! Perhaps Iowa's most improved player from game 1 to game 6. 21/33 for 320 yards and 6 touchdowns. The tds and yardage should not be much of a surprise. However, his improved accuracy and elusiveness shredding tackles were a new wrinkle. With his size, I'd like to see what he could do on some QB draws. If Nate played like this against Wisconsin, we win by 17 points. With all that said, what the @$# was Nate doing still in the game in the last 1:00 of play, randying around chucking deep passes when up by 25 points? Setting aside the fact that he is one big hit away from an injury, that was some Urban Meyer kind or sportsmanship. Also, from a team first perspective, it would have been a great chance to give our backups some much needed game reps. Would be nice if our cupcake media asked this question.

2. TEs - let the debate rage on as to who our best tight end is. Both had 4 catches, TJ for 106 yards and 2 TDs and Fant for 101 and 1 TD. Both had a few drops. TJs pancake block was one for the highlight reel, and Fant extended his touchdown record at Iowa. From what I've seen of both players, my vote goes to TJ. He's got better hands and is the superior blocker. Fant would be our top WR if he split out wide.

3. Which Amani Jones Is It Going to Be - Jones came into the season with the most LB hype from the coaches. He was unceremoniously benched in the first quarter of game 1. Too soon to pull the plug on a guy, one might think? Last week, he was thrust into action due to injury and had 9 tackles in the 2nd half alone, including the biggest hit of the year. So how does he follow up that performance? By being sent back in Kirk's dog house. He only playing a hand full of minutes after serving a 1st half suspension. Not really fair that he's given such a short leash considering coach's pet Bo Bower was allowed to play every down of every game for 3 years, regardless of numerous mistakes. Jones showed last week that he's one of our top 3 LBs, especially with all the injuries.

4. Hesse/Epenesa Debate - Many want to see more playing time for Epenesa. I'm not sure I agree. Hesse was dominant today, with 6 tackles. He doesn't have the flashy sack totals of Epenesa, but he is a tough run stuffer. AJ had just 1 tackle, but it was a bull rush sack that will add to his NFL draft highlight reel. These are complimentary DEs and it's fantastic that Iowa has the luxury of having 3 Big 10 caliber DEs at the same time.

5. Ferentz Play Calling - For the first time this season, I was really happy with the play calling. We threw to set up the run rather than the other way around. There was no running up the middle into 8 men in the box today. The passing game opened up line and allowed Young and Sergent to average 5.5 yards per carry. The more we pass, the better our chances of success. With that said, clock management at the enf of the 1st half was atrocious. We had the ball at mid-field with 40 seconds left and a solid kicker. We run a screen pass for a loss of 1 and burn 30 seconds off the clock. We then gain 10 yards, but there's no time left to do anything.

6. Special Teams Coach Needs to Go - LeVar Woods has been the weak link on the staff for years. He's usually assigned to coach the positions no one else wanted (i.e. co-LB coach one year, TE coach one year, and now special teams). Under Woods, we have seen glaring mental/coaching mistakes on special teams that are unthinkable on other teams. Groenenwig's fair catch on the 3 yard line and the punt bouncing off a blocker already cost us 1 game. Today, Smith Marsette curiously returned a ball from the 1 yard line despite there being a defender on the 3 yardline. Clearly, he did not know that he could fair catch it. Then Groeneweg ran a ball out of the endzone with a defender at the 3 yard line. He got drilled at the 11 yard line, putting us in unacceptably awful field position when he could have simply called a fair catch. The refs bailed us out by flagging Indiana on the play. C'mon, Woods. You are being paid a doctor's salary...do your job or let someone else take it.

7. Talented Defensive Newcomers - How about Geno Stone and Riley Moss stepping in and showing that they belong out there! Combined, they had 11 tackles and an interception, and helped our defense bend but not break. Iowa is deeper at DB than it has been in a decade. Ojemudi-who? He's back to being healthy but I didn't see him out there. May have been passed up?

#52 has had numerous mistakes on special teams. Also, he does not take correction well. If you watch closely, this is a matter of how he is handling his mistakes, not the mistakes themselves. On the other hand, look at #27. More of a strong safety, but he has been playing great!
 

Latest posts

Top