Iowalaws's Post-Game Analysis: Indiana

IowaLawWasRight

Well-Known Member
Now THIS is the offensive output most of us were hoping to see when Greg Davis was sacked. A 41-16 win when the experts in Vegas favored us by just 4 points. A lot to be optimistic about going into next week 5-1 and ranked for the first time in a year.

1. Stanley - what a game! Perhaps Iowa's most improved player from game 1 to game 6. 21/33 for 320 yards and 6 touchdowns. The tds and yardage should not be much of a surprise. However, his improved accuracy and elusiveness shredding tackles were a new wrinkle. With his size, I'd like to see what he could do on some QB draws. If Nate played like this against Wisconsin, we win by 17 points. With all that said, what the @$# was Nate doing still in the game in the last 1:00 of play, randying around chucking deep passes when up by 25 points? Setting aside the fact that he is one big hit away from an injury, that was some Urban Meyer kind or sportsmanship. Also, from a team first perspective, it would have been a great chance to give our backups some much needed game reps. Would be nice if our cupcake media asked this question.

2. TEs - let the debate rage on as to who our best tight end is. Both had 4 catches, TJ for 106 yards and 2 TDs and Fant for 101 and 1 TD. Both had a few drops. TJs pancake block was one for the highlight reel, and Fant extended his touchdown record at Iowa. From what I've seen of both players, my vote goes to TJ. He's got better hands and is the superior blocker. Fant would be our top WR if he split out wide.

3. Which Amani Jones Is It Going to Be - Jones came into the season with the most LB hype from the coaches. He was unceremoniously benched in the first quarter of game 1. Too soon to pull the plug on a guy, one might think? Last week, he was thrust into action due to injury and had 9 tackles in the 2nd half alone, including the biggest hit of the year. So how does he follow up that performance? By being sent back in Kirk's dog house. He only playing a hand full of minutes after serving a 1st half suspension. Not really fair that he's given such a short leash considering coach's pet Bo Bower was allowed to play every down of every game for 3 years, regardless of numerous mistakes. Jones showed last week that he's one of our top 3 LBs, especially with all the injuries.

4. Hesse/Epenesa Debate - Many want to see more playing time for Epenesa. I'm not sure I agree. Hesse was dominant today, with 6 tackles. He doesn't have the flashy sack totals of Epenesa, but he is a tough run stuffer. AJ had just 1 tackle, but it was a bull rush sack that will add to his NFL draft highlight reel. These are complimentary DEs and it's fantastic that Iowa has the luxury of having 3 Big 10 caliber DEs at the same time.

5. Ferentz Play Calling - For the first time this season, I was really happy with the play calling. We threw to set up the run rather than the other way around. There was no running up the middle into 8 men in the box today. The passing game opened up line and allowed Young and Sergent to average 5.5 yards per carry. The more we pass, the better our chances of success. With that said, clock management at the enf of the 1st half was atrocious. We had the ball at mid-field with 40 seconds left and a solid kicker. We run a screen pass for a loss of 1 and burn 30 seconds off the clock. We then gain 10 yards, but there's no time left to do anything.

6. Special Teams Coach Needs to Go - LeVar Woods has been the weak link on the staff for years. He's usually assigned to coach the positions no one else wanted (i.e. co-LB coach one year, TE coach one year, and now special teams). Under Woods, we have seen glaring mental/coaching mistakes on special teams that are unthinkable on other teams. Groenenwig's fair catch on the 3 yard line and the punt bouncing off a blocker already cost us 1 game. Today, Smith Marsette curiously returned a ball from the 1 yard line despite there being a defender on the 3 yardline. Clearly, he did not know that he could fair catch it. Then Groeneweg ran a ball out of the endzone with a defender at the 3 yard line. He got drilled at the 11 yard line, putting us in unacceptably awful field position when he could have simply called a fair catch. The refs bailed us out by flagging Indiana on the play. C'mon, Woods. You are being paid a doctor's salary...do your job or let someone else take it.

7. Talented Defensive Newcomers - How about Geno Stone and Riley Moss stepping in and showing that they belong out there! Combined, they had 11 tackles and an interception, and helped our defense bend but not break. Iowa is deeper at DB than it has been in a decade. Ojemudi-who? He's back to being healthy but I didn't see him out there. May have been passed up?
 
One of, if not the most important thing for a return man is to know where you are on the field and groeneweg doesn’t seem to ever know where he is.
I give ISM a pass because he bobbled the ball I thought, but it didn’t go into the end zone.
 
C'mon, Woods. You are being paid a doctor's salary...do your job or let someone else take it.
Or a lawyers salary.

I agree with everything you said. I'm starting to wonder how much of it is our offensive line is keeping from allowing sacks or how much is it Stanley just can't be tackled?
 
#14 is playing himself out of a job. Just down that ball in the end zone...he got bailed out by an offside...but bonehead play and you just can't have that. One mistake...teach them. Two mistakes...tighten the leash. We are now in uncharted territory. I think he has great potential, but you can't keep making mistakes...the field position ramification is huge. In close games that is sometimes the difference in the game.
 
Now THIS is the offensive output most of us were hoping to see when Greg Davis was sacked. A 41-16 win when the experts in Vegas favored us by just 4 points. A lot to be optimistic about going into next week 5-1 and ranked for the first time in a year.

. Stanley - what a game! Perhaps Iowa's most improved player from game 1 to game 6. 21/33 for 320 yards and 6 touchdowns. The tds and yardage should not be much of a surprise. However, his improved accuracy and elusiveness shredding tackles were a new wrinkle.

#1 With his size, I'd like to see what he could do on some QB draws.

# 2 If Nate played like this against Wisconsin, we win by 17 points.

#3 With all that said, what the @$# was Nate doing still in the game in the last 1:00 of play, randying around chucking deep passes when up by 25 points?

#3 Setting aside the fact that he is one big hit away from an injury,


that was some Urban Meyer kind or sportsmanship. Also, from a team first perspective, it would have been a great chance to give our backups some much needed game reps. Would be nice if our cupcake media asked this question.

?

I agree with most things you say except the bolded parts 1-3 above.

First #1 and #3 are the exact opposite of each other. You want the coaches to call some QB draws into a Dee LIne and Lbkrs yet in #3 you say why is he still in there where he would be "one big hit away from an injury" when late in a game like that he could easily toss it out of bounds and shouldnt get touched.

As far as #2 Nate played very well against Wisky into the 4th qtr but he was not why we lost.
 
The rule is you can call a fair catch and get a touchback wherever you catch it, even if it's not in the endzone. Indiana did it all game long against us when Recenos' kicks didn't go into the end zone. ISM made a huge error, but it's on his coach. I doubt ISM even knew the rule and certainly wasn't coached up on it.


One of, if not the most important thing for a return man is to know where you are on the field and groeneweg doesn’t seem to ever know where he is.
I give ISM a pass because he bobbled the ball I thought, but it didn’t go into the end zone.
 
#14 is playing himself out of a job. Just down that ball in the end zone...he got bailed out by an offside...but bonehead play and you just can't have that. One mistake...teach them. Two mistakes...tighten the leash. We are now in uncharted territory. I think he has great potential, but you can't keep making mistakes...the field position ramification is huge. In close games that is sometimes the difference in the game.

Yet he is better at punt returns than JJ and MVB were. As of now, I am okay with the growing pains aspect of this. If this leads to a big return against Penn St. or whoever it will be worth it. Next year he could be awesome at this.
 
The rule is you can call a fair catch and get a touchback wherever you catch it, even if it's not in the endzone. Indiana did it all game long against us when Recenos' kicks didn't go into the end zone. ISM made a huge error, but it's on his coach. I doubt ISM even knew the rule and certainly wasn't coached up on it.

From what I heard, ISM lost that ball in the sun. Probably still should have downed it in the end zone (if it was in the end zone, not sure).
 
I unfortunately couldn't watch the game live.

Was the INT a bone-head decision (aka last week) or one of those things?
 
Great assessment. Folks can nitpick about some of your observations, but I think you captured the main areas of improvement and those areas that still need work.

Bottom line for me is that this is the most entertaining team, on both sides of the ball, in more than a decade. I love that in player interviews after yesterday's game, they were talking about "stepping on the gas"
 
I unfortunately couldn't watch the game live.

Was the INT a bone-head decision (aka last week) or one of those things?
I would have to rewatch for sure but I think it was a LB dropping into coverage and Stanley just didn’t see him. It went right to him
 
I would have to rewatch for sure but I think it was a LB dropping into coverage and Stanley just didn’t see him. It went right to him

The linebacker fainted into an interior gap like he was blitzing. Stanley made a quick read and threw the slant to what should have been the open area. However the linebacker immediately sunk right into the throwing window. It was a very nice play ran by Indiana. Surely one they had schemed for after Stanley made the same read and throw against Minnesota the week before. He just got tricked.
 
One of, if not the most important thing for a return man is to know where you are on the field and groeneweg doesn’t seem to ever know where he is.
I give ISM a pass because he bobbled the ball I thought, but it didn’t go into the end zone.

Eddie P was saying groeneweg doesnt do much kickoff returns so he did look a little out of sorts.

That being said he does make guys miss, find lanes, and gets good returns. And he seems pretty sure handed.

This is the time of year for glaring sun in the eyes looking back to the south end and I think that is why TJH dropped that pass in the endzone
 
Now THIS is the offensive output most of us were hoping to see when Greg Davis was sacked. A 41-16 win when the experts in Vegas favored us by just 4 points. A lot to be optimistic about going into next week 5-1 and ranked for the first time in a year.

1. Stanley - what a game! Perhaps Iowa's most improved player from game 1 to game 6. 21/33 for 320 yards and 6 touchdowns. The tds and yardage should not be much of a surprise. However, his improved accuracy and elusiveness shredding tackles were a new wrinkle. With his size, I'd like to see what he could do on some QB draws. If Nate played like this against Wisconsin, we win by 17 points. With all that said, what the @$# was Nate doing still in the game in the last 1:00 of play, randying around chucking deep passes when up by 25 points? Setting aside the fact that he is one big hit away from an injury, that was some Urban Meyer kind or sportsmanship. Also, from a team first perspective, it would have been a great chance to give our backups some much needed game reps. Would be nice if our cupcake media asked this question.

2. TEs - let the debate rage on as to who our best tight end is. Both had 4 catches, TJ for 106 yards and 2 TDs and Fant for 101 and 1 TD. Both had a few drops. TJs pancake block was one for the highlight reel, and Fant extended his touchdown record at Iowa. From what I've seen of both players, my vote goes to TJ. He's got better hands and is the superior blocker. Fant would be our top WR if he split out wide.

3. Which Amani Jones Is It Going to Be - Jones came into the season with the most LB hype from the coaches. He was unceremoniously benched in the first quarter of game 1. Too soon to pull the plug on a guy, one might think? Last week, he was thrust into action due to injury and had 9 tackles in the 2nd half alone, including the biggest hit of the year. So how does he follow up that performance? By being sent back in Kirk's dog house. He only playing a hand full of minutes after serving a 1st half suspension. Not really fair that he's given such a short leash considering coach's pet Bo Bower was allowed to play every down of every game for 3 years, regardless of numerous mistakes. Jones showed last week that he's one of our top 3 LBs, especially with all the injuries.

4. Hesse/Epenesa Debate - Many want to see more playing time for Epenesa. I'm not sure I agree. Hesse was dominant today, with 6 tackles. He doesn't have the flashy sack totals of Epenesa, but he is a tough run stuffer. AJ had just 1 tackle, but it was a bull rush sack that will add to his NFL draft highlight reel. These are complimentary DEs and it's fantastic that Iowa has the luxury of having 3 Big 10 caliber DEs at the same time.

5. Ferentz Play Calling - For the first time this season, I was really happy with the play calling. We threw to set up the run rather than the other way around. There was no running up the middle into 8 men in the box today. The passing game opened up line and allowed Young and Sergent to average 5.5 yards per carry. The more we pass, the better our chances of success. With that said, clock management at the enf of the 1st half was atrocious. We had the ball at mid-field with 40 seconds left and a solid kicker. We run a screen pass for a loss of 1 and burn 30 seconds off the clock. We then gain 10 yards, but there's no time left to do anything.

6. Special Teams Coach Needs to Go - LeVar Woods has been the weak link on the staff for years. He's usually assigned to coach the positions no one else wanted (i.e. co-LB coach one year, TE coach one year, and now special teams). Under Woods, we have seen glaring mental/coaching mistakes on special teams that are unthinkable on other teams. Groenenwig's fair catch on the 3 yard line and the punt bouncing off a blocker already cost us 1 game. Today, Smith Marsette curiously returned a ball from the 1 yard line despite there being a defender on the 3 yardline. Clearly, he did not know that he could fair catch it. Then Groeneweg ran a ball out of the endzone with a defender at the 3 yard line. He got drilled at the 11 yard line, putting us in unacceptably awful field position when he could have simply called a fair catch. The refs bailed us out by flagging Indiana on the play. C'mon, Woods. You are being paid a doctor's salary...do your job or let someone else take it.

7. Talented Defensive Newcomers - How about Geno Stone and Riley Moss stepping in and showing that they belong out there! Combined, they had 11 tackles and an interception, and helped our defense bend but not break. Iowa is deeper at DB than it has been in a decade. Ojemudi-who? He's back to being healthy but I didn't see him out there. May have been passed up?

Woods's special teams units are starting to give me concern. The punting game has improved, but the FG unit is largely untested and certainly can't be confidently relied upon. It has been my opinion that the punt return game was just the red headed step child this offseason. Its development was hindered to the benefit of increased focus
(very needed) on the punting game. That it would come around as the season wore on.

I am now starting to worry that my dismissal was in haste. As the offensive and defensive units are rounding into form the return game is starting to be a sore spot. The irony is that our punting game has not been called on to carry the weight of an inefficient offense much this year. The focus applied in the camps was likely now in hindsight overkill.

I hope special teams practice sessions put a greater emphasis on punt return in the upcoming weeks. Other than Penn St I don't know that we will be punting alot from here on out.
 
The linebacker fainted into an interior gap like he was blitzing. Stanley made a quick read and threw the slant to what should have been the open area. However the linebacker immediately sunk right into the throwing window. It was a very nice play ran by Indiana. Surely one they had schemed for after Stanley made the same read and throw against Minnesota the week before. He just got tricked.
It wasn't even just that he feigned blitz and then dropped out at the snap. He feigned a blitz into the non-playside A gap and then pass dropped playside. It's the WR's job to beat the man to the spot where the slant is to be completed; it's the QB's job to make sure the window is open. Zone blitzes and guys dropping after showing blitz constantly make that a tougher read for a QB and Stanley got busted on that play.
 
Those special teams "no think" mistakes are areas you like to iron out and teach in grade school football.
 

Latest posts

Top