IowaLaw's Post-Game Analysis: Purdue

IowaLawWasRight

Well-Known Member
Well, the Hawks were double digit favorites against a 2 win team playing without its star WR and star QB...and escaped with a 26-20 win. It wasn't pretty, and it was too close for comfort, but a win is a win. The Hawks remain in contention for the Big 10 west title, thanks in part to our friends the Fighting Illini. So who stood out to IowaLaw today?

1. Moss - What a whirlwind 12 months it's been for Moss. Last year against Purdue, he was thrust into action as an unprepared freshmen and got absolutely torched. By the end of the season, he grew to become a solid cb. This year, he's been injured and hasn't seen much playing. However, after watching David Bell repeatedly take Hankins to school, staff threw Moss out there again. He responded by immediately intercepting a pass to Bell that would have been caught inside Iowa's 20 yard line. That HUGE int that prevented a touchdown and was likely the difference in the game.

2. Running Backs Disappoint - Coming into the game, Purdue had the second to last rushing defense in the Big 10. The perfect opportunity for Goodson to have a breakout 100+ yard performance. Instead, the RB trio were largely stuffed, until Sargent's 21 yard gain at the end of the game. Goodson averaged just 1.2 yards per carry. Sargent, just 2 yards (until the 4th quarter). Young, just 3.4. All against an awful run defense. If the Hawks are going to have an above average season this year, the running game cannot continue to randy around and must step it up.

3. Smith - Iowa needs Smith to be alright and take the field against Wisconsin after sustaining what looked like a bad injury at the end of the game. He is far and away the most improved player on the team this year. 9 catches for 106 yards is an incredible day...and makes Hawk fans feel like we actually have a legit WR on the team for a change. While Purdue freshmen David Bell nearly doubled Smith's total with 200 receiving yards, and is an example of a star, the goal for the Hawks is to have an honorable mention all-Big 10 caliber WR, not an NFL first rounder.

4. Stanley- Nate was Nate today. 23/33 for 260 yrds, 0 tds, 1 int. Solid game manager. Took very few risks, showed great arm strength on the short throws and some touch on throws into coverage. At the same time, he continued to throw the ball behind his targets, miss wide open receivers, and unnecessarily take sacks. He did enough to beat Purdue. Of course, it didn't hurt that his QB peer was a freshmen backup who had to go up against a rowdy Iowa defense. Plummer was 30/50 for 327 & 2 tds against us and will likely be a stud in a couple of years.

5. Woods Finally Makes Punt Return Adjustment - IowaLaw has not been shy about calling out LeVar Woods as the weakest link on the coaching staff. He has been for years, which is why he was relegated to special teams after dabbling with tight ends and LB coaching duties. This year, our glaring punt returner deficiency has been obvious since game 1, when Ragaini's inability to catch punts made Miami of Ohio's punter look like the second coming of Reggie Roby. However, rather than giving someone else a shot or switching the scheme, the problems persisted week after week. Last week, they made their first adjustment and added a 2nd returner to ensure that balls don't roll. This week, after 7 games, Woods finally made the call to replace Ragaini. Geno Stone and Max Cooper caught every catchable punt and it made the difference of about 40 yards of field position.

6. Sleep Dalton For Newcomer of the Year - I've been saying it all year, but what a difference having a good punter can make. 4 punts for a 47 yard average, including a HUGE 63 yard punt that totally flipped the field on Purdue at a time when we needed it. If you factor in Rastetter's 37 yrds per punt average last year, we gained an extra 40 yards with this grad transfer.
 
giphy.gif


... but a win is a win :)
 
Well, the Hawks were double digit favorites against a 2 win team playing without its star WR and star QB...and escaped with a 26-20 win. It wasn't pretty, and it was too close for comfort, but a win is a win. The Hawks remain in contention for the Big 10 west title, thanks in part to our friends the Fighting Illini. So who stood out to IowaLaw today?

1. Moss - What a whirlwind 12 months it's been for Moss. Last year against Purdue, he was thrust into action as an unprepared freshmen and got absolutely torched. By the end of the season, he grew to become a solid cb. This year, he's been injured and hasn't seen much playing. However, after watching David Bell repeatedly take Hankins to school, staff threw Moss out there again. He responded by immediately intercepting a pass to Bell that would have been caught inside Iowa's 20 yard line. That HUGE int that prevented a touchdown and was likely the difference in the game.

2. Running Backs Disappoint - Coming into the game, Purdue had the second to last rushing defense in the Big 10. The perfect opportunity for Goodson to have a breakout 100+ yard performance. Instead, the RB trio were largely stuffed, until Sargent's 21 yard gain at the end of the game. Goodson averaged just 1.2 yards per carry. Sargent, just 2 yards (until the 4th quarter). Young, just 3.4. All against an awful run defense. If the Hawks are going to have an above average season this year, the running game cannot continue to randy around and must step it up.

3. Smith - Iowa needs Smith to be alright and take the field against Wisconsin after sustaining what looked like a bad injury at the end of the game. He is far and away the most improved player on the team this year. 9 catches for 106 yards is an incredible day...and makes Hawk fans feel like we actually have a legit WR on the team for a change. While Purdue freshmen David Bell nearly doubled Smith's total with 200 receiving yards, and is an example of a star, the goal for the Hawks is to have an honorable mention all-Big 10 caliber WR, not an NFL first rounder.

4. Stanley- Nate was Nate today. 23/33 for 260 yrds, 0 tds, 1 int. Solid game manager. Took very few risks, showed great arm strength on the short throws and some touch on throws into coverage. At the same time, he continued to throw the ball behind his targets, miss wide open receivers, and unnecessarily take sacks. He did enough to beat Purdue. Of course, it didn't hurt that his QB peer was a freshmen backup who had to go up against a rowdy Iowa defense. Plummer was 30/50 for 327 & 2 tds against us and will likely be a stud in a couple of years.

5. Woods Finally Makes Punt Return Adjustment - IowaLaw has not been shy about calling out LeVar Woods as the weakest link on the coaching staff. He has been for years, which is why he was relegated to special teams after dabbling with tight ends and LB coaching duties. This year, our glaring punt returner deficiency has been obvious since game 1, when Ragaini's inability to catch punts made Miami of Ohio's punter look like the second coming of Reggie Roby. However, rather than giving someone else a shot or switching the scheme, the problems persisted week after week. Last week, they made their first adjustment and added a 2nd returner to ensure that balls don't roll. This week, after 7 games, Woods finally made the call to replace Ragaini. Geno Stone and Max Cooper caught every catchable punt and it made the difference of about 40 yards of field position.

6. Sleep Dalton For Newcomer of the Year - I've been saying it all year, but what a difference having a good punter can make. 4 punts for a 47 yard average, including a HUGE 63 yard punt that totally flipped the field on Purdue at a time when we needed it. If you factor in Rastetter's 37 yrds per punt average last year, we gained an extra 40 yards with this grad transfer.
Nate was Nate again for sure. I think it time for Hawk fans to forget that Obio St. game where he was great. Apparently that ain't happening again any time soon. He does continue to miss throws but will occasionally hit a tough throw. After today's performance I am convinced Stanley is just an average QB and we will have to rely on someone else on offense to win games for us.
 
The running game should be truly disturbing to a coaching staff that claims to hang its hat on it. Losing Banwart and Schott has obviously hurt, but they shouldn't be this terrible.
 
Well, the Hawks were double digit favorites against a 2 win team playing without its star WR and star QB...and escaped with a 26-20 win. It wasn't pretty, and it was too close for comfort, but a win is a win. The Hawks remain in contention for the Big 10 west title, thanks in part to our friends the Fighting Illini. So who stood out to IowaLaw today?

1. Moss - What a whirlwind 12 months it's been for Moss. Last year against Purdue, he was thrust into action as an unprepared freshmen and got absolutely torched. By the end of the season, he grew to become a solid cb. This year, he's been injured and hasn't seen much playing. However, after watching David Bell repeatedly take Hankins to school, staff threw Moss out there again. He responded by immediately intercepting a pass to Bell that would have been caught inside Iowa's 20 yard line. That HUGE int that prevented a touchdown and was likely the difference in the game.

2. Running Backs Disappoint - Coming into the game, Purdue had the second to last rushing defense in the Big 10. The perfect opportunity for Goodson to have a breakout 100+ yard performance. Instead, the RB trio were largely stuffed, until Sargent's 21 yard gain at the end of the game. Goodson averaged just 1.2 yards per carry. Sargent, just 2 yards (until the 4th quarter). Young, just 3.4. All against an awful run defense. If the Hawks are going to have an above average season this year, the running game cannot continue to randy around and must step it up.

3. Smith - Iowa needs Smith to be alright and take the field against Wisconsin after sustaining what looked like a bad injury at the end of the game. He is far and away the most improved player on the team this year. 9 catches for 106 yards is an incredible day...and makes Hawk fans feel like we actually have a legit WR on the team for a change. While Purdue freshmen David Bell nearly doubled Smith's total with 200 receiving yards, and is an example of a star, the goal for the Hawks is to have an honorable mention all-Big 10 caliber WR, not an NFL first rounder.

4. Stanley- Nate was Nate today. 23/33 for 260 yrds, 0 tds, 1 int. Solid game manager. Took very few risks, showed great arm strength on the short throws and some touch on throws into coverage. At the same time, he continued to throw the ball behind his targets, miss wide open receivers, and unnecessarily take sacks. He did enough to beat Purdue. Of course, it didn't hurt that his QB peer was a freshmen backup who had to go up against a rowdy Iowa defense. Plummer was 30/50 for 327 & 2 tds against us and will likely be a stud in a couple of years.

5. Woods Finally Makes Punt Return Adjustment - IowaLaw has not been shy about calling out LeVar Woods as the weakest link on the coaching staff. He has been for years, which is why he was relegated to special teams after dabbling with tight ends and LB coaching duties. This year, our glaring punt returner deficiency has been obvious since game 1, when Ragaini's inability to catch punts made Miami of Ohio's punter look like the second coming of Reggie Roby. However, rather than giving someone else a shot or switching the scheme, the problems persisted week after week. Last week, they made their first adjustment and added a 2nd returner to ensure that balls don't roll. This week, after 7 games, Woods finally made the call to replace Ragaini. Geno Stone and Max Cooper caught every catchable punt and it made the difference of about 40 yards of field position.

6. Sleep Dalton For Newcomer of the Year - I've been saying it all year, but what a difference having a good punter can make. 4 punts for a 47 yard average, including a HUGE 63 yard punt that totally flipped the field on Purdue at a time when we needed it. If you factor in Rastetter's 37 yrds per punt average last year, we gained an extra 40 yards with this grad transfer.
Look forward to your eval after every game. Great job
 
Why you don't game plan figuring out how to get Goodson in space more against an LB is beyond stupid. BF would rather go single FB jumbo formation and then run the FB for a loss of 1.5 yds on a CRITICAL 3rd and 1. While averaging 4 yds per QB sneak. Total idiot at OC....not to mention total incompetence at OL coach.
 
Why you don't game plan figuring out how to get Goodson in space more against an LB is beyond stupid. BF would rather go single FB jumbo formation and then run the FB for a loss of 1.5 yds on a CRITICAL 3rd and 1. While averaging 4 yds per QB sneak. Total idiot at OC....not to mention total incompetence at OL coach.
Brian Ferentz is truly an idiot, and has no clue what he is doing. He can't even call a good game against an absolutely awful Purdue defense.
 
1980 - that's right. Nate is your standard game manager who will do enough to beat teams you should beat and lose to teams you shouldn't. To get over the hump, it will require someone else on the offense to step up. Goodson or Smith?

Mose - the running game falls directly on the shoulders of the coach's son, who failed downward from mediocre OLine coach to mediocre "run game coordinator" to below average offensive coordinator. If there's anyone on the staff who was handed credentials to take responsibility of the run game, it's Brian. Like Seepig said, Brian would rather run the fullback up the middle and waste a play every week than actually scheme a running game.

BrianFerentz - is Iceman the only one who reads IowaLaw's posts? A quick scan of weekly post game reviews indicates that you have not only read but commented on virtually every one of IowaLaw's posts. Curious, considering you don't read them and believe they lack merit, don't you think?
 
Fairly conventional thoughts. I think the running problem is more a function of the OL and the play calling, and not the RBs.

Hankins was having his problems on Saturday, so it made sense to pull him for Moss, and Moss was better overall than Hankins on Saturday, but Moss did get beat in the 4th Quarter by the same guy who was beating Hankins, so he wasn't perfect, either. That was Hankins first poor game, so I'd give him a pass and start him against NW.

As far as punt returning, the change came late, but putting 2 guys back seemed to work well. Credit to them for making the change. I'm not sure it cost Iowa in either loss.

I thought Stanley was more mobile this game, not mobile compared to others, buy more mobile compared to prior games. He seemed to bail out of the pocket sooner, which gave him some more time to find a target (the long pass to Smith for example came on a scramble). He missed a couple of targets, including probably a TD pass to Sargent or Tracy in the first quarter, but give him back that throw to Smith that was negated by the penalty for covering up Weiting, and he would have had 300 yards passing. And the INT was a result of an off target throw - yes, Goodson could have caught it, but it was on his back shoulder, when Goodson is running away from it - that could have been better placed. However, every QB misses throws. But, he makes some really good throws into tight spaces. This is who he is, it's not going to change much.

Sleep Dalton is a huge improvement, can't argue that one.
 
If they don't remove that damn quick pass to the sideline play from our playbook I'm gonna whip some ass.
 
Kicking game was the difference for sure. Make up for lack of production in red zone. Our punter outpunted theirs by a long shot.
 
Seriously give IowaLaw a break. Glad he takes time to give “his” detailed analysis. Also gives us stuff to debate, which as you know, we love to do around here
 

Latest posts

Top