IowaLaw's Non-Conference Report Card

IowaLawWasRight

Well-Known Member
The non-conference portion of the schedule is complete and the Hawks are 4-0 and ranked in the top 15 in the nation. While our opponents have not exactly been world beaters (none have beat a single power 5 team), the Hawks have unquestionably looked good and are a legit contender for a Big 10 West title. Here is how the Hawks have stacked up statistically with the rest of the league:

Scoring Defense: A (3rd in Big 10). The defense has been nearly perfect in 4 weeks. This is promising for weeks to come considering they have been ravaged by injuries in the secondary. If they continue to allow just 8.5 points per game, we are looking at a college football playoffs caliber defense.

Scoring Offense: B- (7th in Big 10). The Hawks have been incredible in red zone and time of possession, so the fact that they are just in the middle of the pack in scoring is a bit surprising. Maybe they have taken their foot off the gas a little at the ends of blow out wins, but then again quite a few Big 10 teams have been winning by blow outs, so there must be other reasons at play. Poor clock management has left points on the board and the rain game against ISU was a factor.

Passing Offense: C+ (8th in Big 10). The local media LOVE to talk about Iowa’s WR corp (because it’s been a while since we’ve had one), and Jon Miller is obsessed with touting Nate Stanley’s number of touchdown passes. However, when compared with the rest of the league, Iowa’s passing game is in the bottom half at 247 yards per game, and Stanley’s completion 64% completion percentage puts him 6th in the league (although it is improved over 59% last year). Gone are two of the best TEs in the Ferentz era, but they’ve been replaced by 5 very capable WRs. Maybe Ferentz will open up the offense a bit as the level of competition increases.

Rushing Offense: A- (4th in Big 10). Averaging 218 yrd per game, this year’s OLine and RBs have stepped it up to a level beyond years past (for example, Wadley’s 2017 team averaged only 139 yrds per game). Sargent, Young, and Goodson average 5.2 yards per carry, and I don’t think I could pick one who I’d rather be in the game over the others. It’s been a while since we’ve had such a consistent RB stable.

Sacks: F (13th in Big 10). I think the position group that Hawk fans were most excited about coming into the season was DE, with Epenesa coming back as a pre-season all-American and potential top 10 NFL draft pick. So the fact that the Hawks average just 1.3 sacks per game (more than only Rutgers) is cause for concern given that we haven’t played a decent QB yet. Without pressure on the QB, our young corners are going to be exposed.

Opponents 3rd Down Conversions: A (3rd in Big 10). A huge back breaker in years past has been the bend don’t break defense that will allow Purdue/Northwestern to dink and dunk and pick up first downs on 3rd and long all day. Not this year. The Hawks are holding defenses to just 26% on 3rd down conversions.

Punt Returns: D- (12th in Big 10). Despite having a wealth of skill position talent this year, Kirk continues to stubbornly persist with throwing a freshmen PR out there who has no idea when to field a punt, when to call a fair catch, and when to let a punt roll. This year, the Hawks have returned just 5 punts in 4 games despite pitching shutouts on defense and forcing opponents to punt all the time. This glaring weak point on an otherwise solid roster needs to be fixed, or we will continue to needlessly give away field position as Nico watches punts bounce past him and roll 15 yards or fair catch balls when there’s not a defender within 10 yards of him.

Net Punting: A+ (1st in Big 10). Ferentz family take notice: what a difference a grad transfer can make! After being the worst punting team in college football in 2017 and the worst in the Big 10 in 2018, Sleep Dalton has come in and averaged 46 yards per punt with a net of 43. The extra 10 yards per punt we are getting this year will mean the difference between winning 1 extra game before the season is done.

Penalties: A+ (1st in Big 10). One thing that we can usually count on in a Ferentz coached team is discipline. This year’s Hawks are one of the least penalized teams in the nation with just 26 yards per game. If they continue to play smart and disciplined, they are going to beat teams that have more talent on their rosters (i.e. Mich, Penn State, Wis).
 
The non-conference portion of the schedule is complete and the Hawks are 4-0 and ranked in the top 15 in the nation. While our opponents have not exactly been world beaters (none have beat a single power 5 team), the Hawks have unquestionably looked good and are a legit contender for a Big 10 West title. Here is how the Hawks have stacked up statistically with the rest of the league:

Scoring Defense: A (3rd in Big 10). The defense has been nearly perfect in 4 weeks. This is promising for weeks to come considering they have been ravaged by injuries in the secondary. If they continue to allow just 8.5 points per game, we are looking at a college football playoffs caliber defense.

Scoring Offense: B- (7th in Big 10). The Hawks have been incredible in red zone and time of possession, so the fact that they are just in the middle of the pack in scoring is a bit surprising. Maybe they have taken their foot off the gas a little at the ends of blow out wins, but then again quite a few Big 10 teams have been winning by blow outs, so there must be other reasons at play. Poor clock management has left points on the board and the rain game against ISU was a factor.

Passing Offense: C+ (8th in Big 10). The local media LOVE to talk about Iowa’s WR corp (because it’s been a while since we’ve had one), and Jon Miller is obsessed with touting Nate Stanley’s number of touchdown passes. However, when compared with the rest of the league, Iowa’s passing game is in the bottom half at 247 yards per game, and Stanley’s completion 64% completion percentage puts him 6th in the league (although it is improved over 59% last year). Gone are two of the best TEs in the Ferentz era, but they’ve been replaced by 5 very capable WRs. Maybe Ferentz will open up the offense a bit as the level of competition increases.

Rushing Offense: A- (4th in Big 10). Averaging 218 yrd per game, this year’s OLine and RBs have stepped it up to a level beyond years past (for example, Wadley’s 2017 team averaged only 139 yrds per game). Sargent, Young, and Goodson average 5.2 yards per carry, and I don’t think I could pick one who I’d rather be in the game over the others. It’s been a while since we’ve had such a consistent RB stable.

Sacks: F (13th in Big 10). I think the position group that Hawk fans were most excited about coming into the season was DE, with Epenesa coming back as a pre-season all-American and potential top 10 NFL draft pick. So the fact that the Hawks average just 1.3 sacks per game (more than only Rutgers) is cause for concern given that we haven’t played a decent QB yet. Without pressure on the QB, our young corners are going to be exposed.

Opponents 3rd Down Conversions: A (3rd in Big 10). A huge back breaker in years past has been the bend don’t break defense that will allow Purdue/Northwestern to dink and dunk and pick up first downs on 3rd and long all day. Not this year. The Hawks are holding defenses to just 26% on 3rd down conversions.

Punt Returns: D- (12th in Big 10). Despite having a wealth of skill position talent this year, Kirk continues to stubbornly persist with throwing a freshmen PR out there who has no idea when to field a punt, when to call a fair catch, and when to let a punt roll. This year, the Hawks have returned just 5 punts in 4 games despite pitching shutouts on defense and forcing opponents to punt all the time. This glaring weak point on an otherwise solid roster needs to be fixed, or we will continue to needlessly give away field position as Nico watches punts bounce past him and roll 15 yards or fair catch balls when there’s not a defender within 10 yards of him.

Net Punting: A+ (1st in Big 10). Ferentz family take notice: what a difference a grad transfer can make! After being the worst punting team in college football in 2017 and the worst in the Big 10 in 2018, Sleep Dalton has come in and averaged 46 yards per punt with a net of 43. The extra 10 yards per punt we are getting this year will mean the difference between winning 1 extra game before the season is done.

Penalties: A+ (1st in Big 10). One thing that we can usually count on in a Ferentz coached team is discipline. This year’s Hawks are one of the least penalized teams in the nation with just 26 yards per game. If they continue to play smart and disciplined, they are going to beat teams that have more talent on their rosters (i.e. Mich, Penn State, Wis).
Here's a stat you missed.

Turnovers: A+ The key to our season so far. Do we have one? Did we lose a fumble in the season opener?

We may only be in the middle of the pack in conference passing yardage but our QB is putting the ball in safe places. It also doesn't hurt that three backs are averaging 5.2 ypc.

It's a classic case of hidden yardage adding up and the whole being greater than the sum of the parts. It's how we hang in there against teams with more raw talent and better athletes.
 
The non-conference portion of the schedule is complete and the Hawks are 4-0 and ranked in the top 15 in the nation. While our opponents have not exactly been world beaters (none have beat a single power 5 team), the Hawks have unquestionably looked good and are a legit contender for a Big 10 West title. Here is how the Hawks have stacked up statistically with the rest of the league:

Scoring Defense: A (3rd in Big 10). The defense has been nearly perfect in 4 weeks. This is promising for weeks to come considering they have been ravaged by injuries in the secondary. If they continue to allow just 8.5 points per game, we are looking at a college football playoffs caliber defense.

Scoring Offense: B- (7th in Big 10). The Hawks have been incredible in red zone and time of possession, so the fact that they are just in the middle of the pack in scoring is a bit surprising. Maybe they have taken their foot off the gas a little at the ends of blow out wins, but then again quite a few Big 10 teams have been winning by blow outs, so there must be other reasons at play. Poor clock management has left points on the board and the rain game against ISU was a factor.

Passing Offense: C+ (8th in Big 10). The local media LOVE to talk about Iowa’s WR corp (because it’s been a while since we’ve had one), and Jon Miller is obsessed with touting Nate Stanley’s number of touchdown passes. However, when compared with the rest of the league, Iowa’s passing game is in the bottom half at 247 yards per game, and Stanley’s completion 64% completion percentage puts him 6th in the league (although it is improved over 59% last year). Gone are two of the best TEs in the Ferentz era, but they’ve been replaced by 5 very capable WRs. Maybe Ferentz will open up the offense a bit as the level of competition increases.

Rushing Offense: A- (4th in Big 10). Averaging 218 yrd per game, this year’s OLine and RBs have stepped it up to a level beyond years past (for example, Wadley’s 2017 team averaged only 139 yrds per game). Sargent, Young, and Goodson average 5.2 yards per carry, and I don’t think I could pick one who I’d rather be in the game over the others. It’s been a while since we’ve had such a consistent RB stable.

Sacks: F (13th in Big 10). I think the position group that Hawk fans were most excited about coming into the season was DE, with Epenesa coming back as a pre-season all-American and potential top 10 NFL draft pick. So the fact that the Hawks average just 1.3 sacks per game (more than only Rutgers) is cause for concern given that we haven’t played a decent QB yet. Without pressure on the QB, our young corners are going to be exposed.

Opponents 3rd Down Conversions: A (3rd in Big 10). A huge back breaker in years past has been the bend don’t break defense that will allow Purdue/Northwestern to dink and dunk and pick up first downs on 3rd and long all day. Not this year. The Hawks are holding defenses to just 26% on 3rd down conversions.

Punt Returns: D- (12th in Big 10). Despite having a wealth of skill position talent this year, Kirk continues to stubbornly persist with throwing a freshmen PR out there who has no idea when to field a punt, when to call a fair catch, and when to let a punt roll. This year, the Hawks have returned just 5 punts in 4 games despite pitching shutouts on defense and forcing opponents to punt all the time. This glaring weak point on an otherwise solid roster needs to be fixed, or we will continue to needlessly give away field position as Nico watches punts bounce past him and roll 15 yards or fair catch balls when there’s not a defender within 10 yards of him.

Net Punting: A+ (1st in Big 10). Ferentz family take notice: what a difference a grad transfer can make! After being the worst punting team in college football in 2017 and the worst in the Big 10 in 2018, Sleep Dalton has come in and averaged 46 yards per punt with a net of 43. The extra 10 yards per punt we are getting this year will mean the difference between winning 1 extra game before the season is done.

Penalties: A+ (1st in Big 10). One thing that we can usually count on in a Ferentz coached team is discipline. This year’s Hawks are one of the least penalized teams in the nation with just 26 yards per game. If they continue to play smart and disciplined, they are going to beat teams that have more talent on their rosters (i.e. Mich, Penn State, Wis).

Purdy isn't a decent QB?

Pretty sure they don't have to "take notice" as they are the family responsible for bringing Sleep-Dalton in.
 
Here's a stat you missed.

Turnovers: A+ The key to our season so far. Do we have one? Did we lose a fumble in the season opener?

We may only be in the middle of the pack in conference passing yardage but our QB is putting the ball in safe places. It also doesn't hurt that three backs are averaging 5.2 ypc.

It's a classic case of hidden yardage adding up and the whole being greater than the sum of the parts. It's how we hang in there against teams with more raw talent and better athletes.

Yes, the only 1 we have is the ill advised pitch attempt from Ross in the opener.
 
As always, I appreciate you taking the time to throw it out there. Scoring offense: we average 33 points per game, and that's with a game where the field was a slip and slide and players couldn't plant properly against one of the best defenses on our schedule and that had two delays. B- seems off base on that one. Punt returns should be an F. Sacks seems like a weird arbitrary category. dline play or qb pressure would make more sense. In which case it should be a C to C-. The pressure is responsible for poor performances by qb's. We've played mostly passing teams and they haven't done much against us, because of the hurries. Don't forget AJ is responsible for a couple of our interceptions this year by hitting the qb as he threw. Our passing offense has been very good I've thought.
 
Being that we are a ball control wind the clock kind of offense I doubt we will ever put up huge passing numbers. Passing game is a B. Punt returning is an F.
 
If there are no turnovers, punt returning can’t be an F . We win the Wiscy game last year without two turnovers on punt returns. Now that’s an F but I bet the same people think we were better last year. Also, allowing the fake punt against Wiscy in 2010. That was an F.
 
The non-conference portion of the schedule is complete and the Hawks are 4-0 and ranked in the top 15 in the nation. While our opponents have not exactly been world beaters (none have beat a single power 5 team), the Hawks have unquestionably looked good and are a legit contender for a Big 10 West title. Here is how the Hawks have stacked up statistically with the rest of the league:

Scoring Defense: A (3rd in Big 10). The defense has been nearly perfect in 4 weeks. This is promising for weeks to come considering they have been ravaged by injuries in the secondary. If they continue to allow just 8.5 points per game, we are looking at a college football playoffs caliber defense.

Scoring Offense: B- (7th in Big 10). The Hawks have been incredible in red zone and time of possession, so the fact that they are just in the middle of the pack in scoring is a bit surprising. Maybe they have taken their foot off the gas a little at the ends of blow out wins, but then again quite a few Big 10 teams have been winning by blow outs, so there must be other reasons at play. Poor clock management has left points on the board and the rain game against ISU was a factor.

Passing Offense: C+ (8th in Big 10). The local media LOVE to talk about Iowa’s WR corp (because it’s been a while since we’ve had one), and Jon Miller is obsessed with touting Nate Stanley’s number of touchdown passes. However, when compared with the rest of the league, Iowa’s passing game is in the bottom half at 247 yards per game, and Stanley’s completion 64% completion percentage puts him 6th in the league (although it is improved over 59% last year). Gone are two of the best TEs in the Ferentz era, but they’ve been replaced by 5 very capable WRs. Maybe Ferentz will open up the offense a bit as the level of competition increases.

Rushing Offense: A- (4th in Big 10). Averaging 218 yrd per game, this year’s OLine and RBs have stepped it up to a level beyond years past (for example, Wadley’s 2017 team averaged only 139 yrds per game). Sargent, Young, and Goodson average 5.2 yards per carry, and I don’t think I could pick one who I’d rather be in the game over the others. It’s been a while since we’ve had such a consistent RB stable.

Sacks: F (13th in Big 10). I think the position group that Hawk fans were most excited about coming into the season was DE, with Epenesa coming back as a pre-season all-American and potential top 10 NFL draft pick. So the fact that the Hawks average just 1.3 sacks per game (more than only Rutgers) is cause for concern given that we haven’t played a decent QB yet. Without pressure on the QB, our young corners are going to be exposed.

Opponents 3rd Down Conversions: A (3rd in Big 10). A huge back breaker in years past has been the bend don’t break defense that will allow Purdue/Northwestern to dink and dunk and pick up first downs on 3rd and long all day. Not this year. The Hawks are holding defenses to just 26% on 3rd down conversions.

Punt Returns: D- (12th in Big 10). Despite having a wealth of skill position talent this year, Kirk continues to stubbornly persist with throwing a freshmen PR out there who has no idea when to field a punt, when to call a fair catch, and when to let a punt roll. This year, the Hawks have returned just 5 punts in 4 games despite pitching shutouts on defense and forcing opponents to punt all the time. This glaring weak point on an otherwise solid roster needs to be fixed, or we will continue to needlessly give away field position as Nico watches punts bounce past him and roll 15 yards or fair catch balls when there’s not a defender within 10 yards of him.

Net Punting: A+ (1st in Big 10). Ferentz family take notice: what a difference a grad transfer can make! After being the worst punting team in college football in 2017 and the worst in the Big 10 in 2018, Sleep Dalton has come in and averaged 46 yards per punt with a net of 43. The extra 10 yards per punt we are getting this year will mean the difference between winning 1 extra game before the season is done.

Penalties: A+ (1st in Big 10). One thing that we can usually count on in a Ferentz coached team is discipline. This year’s Hawks are one of the least penalized teams in the nation with just 26 yards per game. If they continue to play smart and disciplined, they are going to beat teams that have more talent on their rosters (i.e. Mich, Penn State, Wis).
You still suck shit at writing.
 
Purdy isn't a decent QB?

Pretty sure they don't have to "take notice" as they are the family responsible for bringing Sleep-Dalton in.
I think it is official that the OP doesn't know anything about football if he doesn't understand that KF had to, at the very least, approve the transfer's scholarship and more likely told his staff to find a damn punter in the portal.
 
Last edited:
The non-conference portion of the schedule is complete and the Hawks are 4-0 and ranked in the top 15 in the nation. While our opponents have not exactly been world beaters (none have beat a single power 5 team), the Hawks have unquestionably looked good and are a legit contender for a Big 10 West title. Here is how the Hawks have stacked up statistically with the rest of the league:

Scoring Defense: A (3rd in Big 10). The defense has been nearly perfect in 4 weeks. This is promising for weeks to come considering they have been ravaged by injuries in the secondary. If they continue to allow just 8.5 points per game, we are looking at a college football playoffs caliber defense.

Scoring Offense: B- (7th in Big 10). The Hawks have been incredible in red zone and time of possession, so the fact that they are just in the middle of the pack in scoring is a bit surprising. Maybe they have taken their foot off the gas a little at the ends of blow out wins, but then again quite a few Big 10 teams have been winning by blow outs, so there must be other reasons at play. Poor clock management has left points on the board and the rain game against ISU was a factor.

Passing Offense: C+ (8th in Big 10). The local media LOVE to talk about Iowa’s WR corp (because it’s been a while since we’ve had one), and Jon Miller is obsessed with touting Nate Stanley’s number of touchdown passes. However, when compared with the rest of the league, Iowa’s passing game is in the bottom half at 247 yards per game, and Stanley’s completion 64% completion percentage puts him 6th in the league (although it is improved over 59% last year). Gone are two of the best TEs in the Ferentz era, but they’ve been replaced by 5 very capable WRs. Maybe Ferentz will open up the offense a bit as the level of competition increases.

Rushing Offense: A- (4th in Big 10). Averaging 218 yrd per game, this year’s OLine and RBs have stepped it up to a level beyond years past (for example, Wadley’s 2017 team averaged only 139 yrds per game). Sargent, Young, and Goodson average 5.2 yards per carry, and I don’t think I could pick one who I’d rather be in the game over the others. It’s been a while since we’ve had such a consistent RB stable.

Sacks: F (13th in Big 10). I think the position group that Hawk fans were most excited about coming into the season was DE, with Epenesa coming back as a pre-season all-American and potential top 10 NFL draft pick. So the fact that the Hawks average just 1.3 sacks per game (more than only Rutgers) is cause for concern given that we haven’t played a decent QB yet. Without pressure on the QB, our young corners are going to be exposed.

Opponents 3rd Down Conversions: A (3rd in Big 10). A huge back breaker in years past has been the bend don’t break defense that will allow Purdue/Northwestern to dink and dunk and pick up first downs on 3rd and long all day. Not this year. The Hawks are holding defenses to just 26% on 3rd down conversions.

Punt Returns: D- (12th in Big 10). Despite having a wealth of skill position talent this year, Kirk continues to stubbornly persist with throwing a freshmen PR out there who has no idea when to field a punt, when to call a fair catch, and when to let a punt roll. This year, the Hawks have returned just 5 punts in 4 games despite pitching shutouts on defense and forcing opponents to punt all the time. This glaring weak point on an otherwise solid roster needs to be fixed, or we will continue to needlessly give away field position as Nico watches punts bounce past him and roll 15 yards or fair catch balls when there’s not a defender within 10 yards of him.

Net Punting: A+ (1st in Big 10). Ferentz family take notice: what a difference a grad transfer can make! After being the worst punting team in college football in 2017 and the worst in the Big 10 in 2018, Sleep Dalton has come in and averaged 46 yards per punt with a net of 43. The extra 10 yards per punt we are getting this year will mean the difference between winning 1 extra game before the season is done.

Penalties: A+ (1st in Big 10). One thing that we can usually count on in a Ferentz coached team is discipline. This year’s Hawks are one of the least penalized teams in the nation with just 26 yards per game. If they continue to play smart and disciplined, they are going to beat teams that have more talent on their rosters (i.e. Mich, Penn State, Wis).
I will say good job for at least getting one thing right - not labeling this thread as objective.
 
The non-conference portion of the schedule is complete and the Hawks are 4-0 and ranked in the top 15 in the nation. While our opponents have not exactly been world beaters (none have beat a single power 5 team), the Hawks have unquestionably looked good and are a legit contender for a Big 10 West title. Here is how the Hawks have stacked up statistically with the rest of the league:

Scoring Defense: A (3rd in Big 10). The defense has been nearly perfect in 4 weeks. This is promising for weeks to come considering they have been ravaged by injuries in the secondary. If they continue to allow just 8.5 points per game, we are looking at a college football playoffs caliber defense.

I think the defense will be good but if you think we are going to avg only giving up 8.5 points per game the rest of the way you are way out there. I will be happy if the defense only gives up 17-20 points on avg the rest of the way. I think our offense can score more points than that which could lead to a really good record.
 
Northside - no doubt the Hawks aren't turning the ball over thus far, which helped a lot in the 1 point ISU game. But if you're arguing that Stanley's pass efficiency has been through the roof in "hidden yards" because he's putting the ball in safe places, the stats don't exactly back that up. Justin Fields, Sean Clifford (PSU), Jack Coan (Wis), Brian Lewerke (MSU), basically the QBs from all of the top Big 10 teams, have 1 INT or less this season, but are throwing for more yards or have a higher completion percentage thus far. That's not to say that Nate isn't have a good season, cause he is. Some are just having better seasons.

Lgend - you are arguing that ISU's Brock Purdy is an elite QB? I like the guy and think he would make a great Hawkeye (right now, he's completing 70% of his passes), but he's not one of the top QBs we will face this year.

Larrystation - having an offense that averages 33 points per game is good, but it's only B- worthy at this point in the season based on the level of competition we've played. We put up 30 points against lowly Rutgers...then Michigan came in and put up 52 against them. We scored 38 points against lowly Miami, then Ohio State came in and scored 72 against them. Iowa's points per game is largely a result of a cupcake schedule.
 
Northside - no doubt the Hawks aren't turning the ball over thus far, which helped a lot in the 1 point ISU game. But if you're arguing that Stanley's pass efficiency has been through the roof in "hidden yards" because he's putting the ball in safe places, the stats don't exactly back that up. Justin Fields, Sean Clifford (PSU), Jack Coan (Wis), Brian Lewerke (MSU), basically the QBs from all of the top Big 10 teams, have 1 INT or less this season, but are throwing for more yards or have a higher completion percentage thus far. That's not to say that Nate isn't have a good season, cause he is. Some are just having better seasons.

Lgend - you are arguing that ISU's Brock Purdy is an elite QB? I like the guy and think he would make a great Hawkeye (right now, he's completing 70% of his passes), but he's not one of the top QBs we will face this year.

Larrystation - having an offense that averages 33 points per game is good, but it's only B- worthy at this point in the season based on the level of competition we've played. We put up 30 points against lowly Rutgers...then Michigan came in and put up 52 against them. We scored 38 points against lowly Miami, then Ohio State came in and scored 72 against them. Iowa's points per game is largely a result of a cupcake schedule.
I was pointing out "hidden yards" all over the field, not just with the passing game.

And to make another point clear, I am not an advocate for Stanley making it as an NFL quarterback. But he is a good QB for Kirk and Brian's system because he keeps the ball out of harm's way
 
I was pointing out "hidden yards" all over the field, not just with the passing game.

And to make another point clear, I am not an advocate for Stanley making it as an NFL quarterback. But he is a good QB for Kirk and Brian's system because he keeps the ball out of harm's way

He probably hasn't faced enough good competition yet to determine that for IowaLaw - his 60-16 TD/INT ratio isn't enough data.
 
The couple things I find interesting is that Iowas D is really good right? Giving up 8 pts a game. Not a ton of yards. Forcing some turnovers. However we are 2nd to last (to Michigan of all teams) at tackles for loss. So we aren't getting sacks and pushing back the LOS on teams so much. I highly doubt we've seen both of those things be true about a team in one year. We must be leading the country in giving up short gains. I find it fascinating and wonder if this trend will continue or if we'll start getting to the QBs more and get some more TFLs.
 
If there are no turnovers, punt returning can’t be an F .
Letting a ball bounce down to inside the 5yd line, when it could have been fielded around the 20yd line, is almost as bad as a turnover. Being that close to your goal line eliminates a big chunk of your playbook. If we were playing anyone other than Rutgers, the results could have been a lot worse.
 
Sacks: F (13th in Big 10). I think the position group that Hawk fans were most excited about coming into the season was DE, with Epenesa coming back as a pre-season all-American and potential top 10 NFL draft pick. So the fact that the Hawks average just 1.3 sacks per game (more than only Rutgers) is cause for concern given that we haven’t played a decent QB yet. Without pressure on the QB, our young corners are going to be exposed.
I've always thought that when analyzing d-line pressure, you should look at the sum of sacks, hurries, and the other team's holding penalties on pass plays. Maybe 2 points for a sack and 1 point for hurries and holding penalties. Iowa would probably fare a little better under that metric.
 
The couple things I find interesting is that Iowas D is really good right? Giving up 8 pts a game. Not a ton of yards. Forcing some turnovers. However we are 2nd to last (to Michigan of all teams) at tackles for loss. So we aren't getting sacks and pushing back the LOS on teams so much. I highly doubt we've seen both of those things be true about a team in one year. We must be leading the country in giving up short gains. I find it fascinating and wonder if this trend will continue or if we'll start getting to the QBs more and get some more TFLs.
This is also a bi-product of the types of offenses and qbs we have been facing.
Oddly enough, we might put up better sack numbers against Wiscy due to the type of offense they run even though they might be the best oline we play against all year.
 

Latest posts

Top