Iowa Hoops Lineup, Outlook for 2011-2012

JonDMiller

Publisher/Founder
With the commitment of Anthony Hubbard, the Iowa basketball program has added a significant piece to its rebuilding puzzle.

Let's take a look at the known and shed some light on the unknowns as it relates to the personnel Fran McCaffery will have available to him next year and how this team will look...

THE KNOWN

Matt Gatens: Despite his three-point shooting percentage numbers last two years (.328 & .331) Gatens is a good outside shooter. The biggest problem Gatens has faced the last two years is his being the lone legitimate three-point shooter on the team. He has Jake Kelly on the team as a freshman, and Kelly was a player that grew into a dynamic scorer, someone that could attack the rim and thereby forced wing defenders to sag off of Gatens a bit, as well as being someone that could knock down the three as well. Teams had to allocate perimeter resources to both Kelly and Gatens. Plus, Gatens had a bit of an unknown factor to him as a freshman. He made nearly 41% of his treys that year, and the past two years, when Iowa's personnel level was at its lowest collective point in three decades, he has suffered. He can still shoot the ball well and I think he is going to show that on the court this year.

Melsahn Basabe: At worst, Basabe was the 4th best freshman in the league last year and the second best freshman big. Entering next year, he might be the second best inside scorer in the Big Ten behind Ohio State's Jared Sullinger. Basabe averaged 11 points and 7 rebounds per game last year in just 24 minutes per contest. He scored in double figures in 11 of his final 14 regular season games as opposed to just six double figure games in the first 16 games of the year, all but four of those games coming against teams from outside the Big Ten. In short, he got better as the year went on and as the competition got better. Also take into account that as it relates to a polished offensive game, Basabe has a world of improving he can do and he showed a great foundation for being able to add on what he did this year. I don't think its far fetched to think he can average 15 and 8 this year, and there have been few Iowa players to have done that over the past three decades. His body control is exceptional and he wound up hitting more than 70% of his free throws. The sky is the limit for him, but he is going to draw a lot of attention heading into this year.

Bryce Cartwright: He led the Big Ten in assists at nearly seven per game and averaged 11 points per game for the entire year. He grew in confidence as the season wore on and he went from being somewhat of a liability in November and December to being 'the guy' at the end of the year. He will enter this season full of confidence that this is 'his team' and if he puts in the work on his three-point shooting and can improve in that area (shot just .275 last year), it will expand the floor for Basabe and all of his teammates.

When you look at these three players that return for Iowa, they are the heart and soul of the program for next year. They combined to average 34.5 points per game last year and are among the top 13 returning scorers in the league. I have not done the research on this yet, but you may not find many three returning players on any one Big Ten team that bring back the scoring these three do.

Eric May: Averaged just under 8 points per game and really faded down the stretch for Iowa. It appeared that May was suffering from a confidence problem, as he just was not in synch over the final month or two of the year, failing to score in double figures in any of Iowa's final eight games. He has the ability to be a solid player for Iowa next year and has a good stroke from beyond the arc, as he hit .394 from downtown last year. Iowa is going to need all of the outside shooting it can get in 2011-2012 to open the lane up for Basabe et al. We all know he has excellent athletic ability and he is no where near his peak.

Andrew Brommer: At the end of the Todd Lickliter era, I wrote that I felt Brommer had some considerable potential. He just didn't get enough time on the court to be able to relax and get in the flow of the game. Granted, he typically made mistakes that brought the hook, but he ran the floor well for a big man and when he did relax and 'slow down' to normal speed, he had the foundation of some decent offense. With Brommer, it's sort of like a record player. There were three speed settings on old school record players, and you could play a record at a high speed and it would sound like Alvin and the Chipmunks. When you played it at its normal speed, it sounded good, as it was supposed to. When Brommer plays at the proper RPM's, he has flashed some positives and more than just spot duty positives. George Brett once said that the secret for a lot of young baseball players was to 'try a little easier'. I think that applies to Brommer and last season he had ample opportunity to acclimate himself to the Big Ten game. If he can develop this off season and learn to relax and play within himself and the pace of the game, or try a little easier, I think he could be a key role player. I am not going to predict All Big Ten stuff from him, but he can be a guy that can average 7 and 5 for you playing 18 to 20 minutes a game.

Zach McCabe: He averaged just under 6 points and 4 rebounds per game last year in about 20 minutes per game. Those numbers must increase and I think they will. He has a good head for the game and can be an inside and outside threat. He's not a #1, #2 or #3 option in the Big Ten as far as pecking order for scoring at this point in time and won't be next year, but this next year will tell a lot as to the type of player he can become. He attempted the second most three-point shots this past year so he needs to work on that area of his game, as he made just over 28% of his treys.

Devyn Marble: This kid has a lot of upside and I am not sure when we are going to see him blossom. I don't know that I would predict that for next year; it might be his junior season, the same with McCabe. He scored 5.7 points per game in just under 20 minutes per game of playing time. He was rail thin as a freshman and will put a lot of work in the weight room this year and next. He showed flashes of brilliance in traffic, and the beginnings of a dribble-drive game. His length will continue to be something that creates problems in the passing lanes for opposing defenses and I really hope he takes defense to heart this summer because that is where he can absolutely have a big effect next year on the court.

Devon Archie: This is another player that just needs to slow down a bit. He can be a strong presence on the defensive end of the floor and he has some decent ball and body skills with his back to the basket. He has shown to be pretty quick on the block and if he can harness that energy to where he controls his body and doesn't get ahead of his brain, he can serve a role for this team. Now, he might be the worst free throw shooter I have ever seen, but we are talking about a guy who might play 8 to 10 minutes a game.

THE UNKNOWN

Anthony Hubbard: Juco All American, averaged 21 points and 11 boards per game last year. Very good off the dribble and aggressive at attacking the basket. Will get to the free throw line a lot next year, but has not been good from the stripe. Not a great outside shooter and attempted less than 40 trey's last year at the Juco level. Strong on the glass, strong overall, which is what you would expect from a 26-year old man. Very athletic and will provide a nice combination on the block with Basabe. I am not saying he is like Roy Marble Senior, because Roy was one of the best to ever play at Iowa. But Marble made his living 16 feet in, attacking the glass, scoring in traffic and not from the perimeter. I think that is what you will see from Hubbard. If he can defend the 6-7 to 6-8 players in this league, his value goes even higher. Iowa simply has not had a player with his skill set in some time, and his versatility is going to help most every player on the team have an easier time doing what they are good at.

Aaron White: 6-8 athletic player that can score in traffic, get out and run and hit the perimeter shot. I am very interested in seeing him arrive on campus...based on the tape I have seen, he reminds me of a Robbie Hummel, without Hummel's dead-eye accuracy.

Josh Oglesby: Three point shooter and good height at 6-5. Will help this team shore up a huge weakness next year, and that is another consistent threat from beyond the arc. He is going to get opportunities to play early and often as long as he knocks down the shots.

Iowa fans were excited to see some uptempo basketball return to Carver Hawkeye last year, although the team still wound up averaging 67.2 points per game. They will be average more than 70 this year as you will see more fast breaks and secondary breaks. McCaffery has more pieces with which to play his style and players like Hubbard and perhaps White will give Iowa a myriad of combinations depending on what the game situation dictates. Cartwright is the single most important player on the team due to the lack of options at point guard behind him, but the addition of Hubbard is like the queen piece on a chessboard; he can do a lot of things that can cause opponents damage.

All three newcomers will be counted upon, so there is a lot of speculation as to what this team may look like. That being said, I think a .500 season should be expected and some type of 'March Situation', to quote Steve Alford, should also be expected. Whether that is the CBI, NIT or some other acronym that doesn't matter as much as the NCAA will be the big question.

Most Big Ten teams have lost a lot and the league will not be nearly as tough next season as it was this past season. Michigan may lose its talented point guard to the NBA...Illinois lost two double figure scorers including its point guard. Northwestern's John Shurna is looking at the NBA...Talor Battle is gone from Penn State...Michigan State has to find their mojo...Minnesota seems to be treading water, having plateaued under Tubby Smith...Purdue loses Johnson and Moore.

There isn't a 'scary' team in this league for next year and Iowa is going to be a much better team.

PROJECTED STARTERS

Basabe
Gatens
Cartwright
Hubbard
Brommer

BENCH

Shooter: Oglesby
Wing: Marble, May, McCabe, White
Paint: Archie

Iowa still has two scholarships open. It would be great if McCaffery could land a point guard, but the pickings seem slim. Then again, Iowa didn't land Cartwright until June of last summer.
 
Yes it is. I was excited after this past season came to an end...more so than I have been in years.

Same with me. I love Iowa football but with the way the basketball program is headed it doesnt make the end of football season so depressing anymore.
 
If Iowa doesn't take another PG in this class (preferably a JUCO), then, even if Iowa were to land Gesell, they would be playing two seasons in a row with one scholarship PG on the roster. And, next season, that only PG would be a true freshman. (I seriously can't see Iowa telling Gesell they will be offering another PG in his recruiting class).

(And, please don't give me the Marble or Hubbard argument. Marble is not a PG. He proved his best position is SG. Hubbard is 6-5, 220. Fran has already said his best position is SF.)

So, does anyone really believe Iowa is not ACTIVELY looking for another PG right now in this class?
 
I agree Lumu that they really need to locate a PG.

I am left feeling that the Juco kid that was supposed to come in last weekend that they told not to come, was a matter of not being 100% sold on his ability for the next two years...OR that they feel they still have a shot with someone, or more than one player they like better and they let him down easy.
 
I am not so sure Marble can not play PG. True, he did not play it consistently well last year but.. he will have summer and Fall to work on needed skills. He was practicing at SG until Cully was hurt. I too hope they find another PG this Spring but am not as pessimistic if they dont.

I believe the running game is not truly ingrained in Iowa players. In last Purdue game, when Cartwright hurt his ankle, they still ran fast break even though Cartwright not able to take outlet pass. Cant rememb er exactly how it happened but it was nice to see. With more depth, there will be more full court pressure in 2011-12 as well.
 
With the addition of Hubbard, it appears May is the odd man out in the starting lineup. Anyone have an idea if that sits well with him? It's gotta be tough starting as a frosh/soph. then being bumped out. I like May, and believe he'll be a "team first" guy, but just wonder how that will go over.
 
Last edited:
Marble did a decent job in a pinch, but I don't think his game or build is suited to the PG position. No knock on Marble, but smaller, quicker guards got by him with ease in space. Marble is well suited to be a slasher from the wing, as he is quick and has good handles for that spot on the floor, just not PG quicks or handles IMO.

We don't need a 4 star kid to provide an upgrade. There are always kids under the radar (juco and high school) that could provide some much needed depth at the guard spot and this staff has tentacles reaching far and wide, unlike past regimes.
 
My concerns with Gatens-
Can he accept being just a shooter or can the coaches tell him to concentrate on such?

Yes, I want him shooting throws, but he's not good at drawing fouls in the 1/2 court.
 
The biggest problem with Marble playing point is that it limits his progression as a wing.

Agreed. I'm on the record saying that I think Marble will progress enough to be a more than capable PG in spot duty. But, as you said, it hinders his progression at the wing. I would rather sign a PG than a big this year.
 
With the addition of Hubbard, it appears May is the odd man out in the starting lineup. Anyone have an idea if that sits well with him? It's gotta be tough starting as a frosh/soph. then being bumped out. I like May, and believe he'll be a "team first" guy, but just wonder how that will go over.

May was benched towards the end of last year in favor of Marble. I don't care how it sits with him. Starting is based on performance alone.


"Matt Gatens: Despite his three-point shooting percentage numbers last two years (.328 & .331) Gatens is a good outside shooter."

What does this mean? Despite the known evidence, the contrary is true. Why should anyone believe Matt Gatens is an above average shooter. His high school career doesn't show it, and neither does his collegiate career.
 
I will also wager he shoots over .400 from three next year

Are you saying, "I think he shoots over 40%," or do you really wanna bet?

25$ to the charity of choice?

If he shoots less than 40% for beyond the arc, you can donate 25 bucks to the Muscular Dystrophy Association.

If he shoots over 40%, I will give 25 dollars to whatever charity you would like, as long as it isn't overtly political, make it a charity.
 
Nice write-up Jon. Reminded me of the old Denverhawk emails. A couple of points:
1. I think you are right about Gaten's shooting. He shoots better this year and here's why: he no longer will be drawing the other team's best defender or even 2nd best. Hubbbard, Basabe, and Cartwright will get that honor.

2. I expect Iowa to be MUCH better defenseively this year, with more trapping and pressure defense.

3. At times last year I saw Iowa wear down at the ends of both halves. I don't see that problem this year.
 
Iowa needs other players besides Bryce to get in the late and create opportunities for others. May and Gatens struggle off the dribble, Marble showed potential and I think he can get better at it. Hubbard is going to really help in that department. If Hubbard can work on the outside shot he will be a really tough guy to guard based on his ability to get the rim.
 
The biggest problem with Marble playing point is that it limits his progression as a wing.

I have to say the biggest problem I see is Marble is not a point. I don't understand how you could expect a guy that averaged 1.2 assists per game to play point in the Big 10.

Secondly like Jon said it costs him experience at the wing.
Fran sure needs to land a Juco point next season that is really what I see.
 
Are you saying, "I think he shoots over 40%," or do you really wanna bet?

25$ to the charity of choice?

If he shoots less than 40% for beyond the arc, you can donate 25 bucks to the Muscular Dystrophy Association.

If he shoots over 40%, I will give 25 dollars to whatever charity you would like, as long as it isn't overtly political, make it a charity.

Let me look into this to make sure there are not legal issues with something I have in mind..I'd like to make this larger than just one guy an $25. I'd like to look to open it up to say 40 people at a $25 dollar pledge vs my statement and side.

The cool thing is even those that would put $25 down against it, if the $ goes to a charity like Childserve or something like, wont be made if they lose the wager...and also, it means Iowa is gonna be in a good spot too...so everyone wins...which is why this is a silly thing to wager on because there is a negative involved..

Perhaps we should do a $5 donation for every made Iowa three out of my pocket, and site users can sign up to commit $.25 cents for every three made or whatever they want, and next March, we send a nice check to Childserve.
 

Latest posts

Top