Not so bummed that KOK retired as he was old but I totally agree that Kirk could have really brought in an up and coming QB coach or just someone who had some bona fides as a qb coach. We got nothing from what I and most of us know of. Brian's main QB coaching will probably be "you got to negotiate the safeties"I was bummed when KOK stepped down that we didn't go outside and hire a real QB coach. Just handing it over to BF seemed like the lazy thing to do. S
Exactly. What's the main critique on Petras? That his fundamentals are inconsistent and footwork is always sloppy. That affects his accuracy. Is BF really qualified to coach up QBs on the fundamentals of how they should drop back set and throw? You're right the best BF can do is show him on the white board and on tape where to go with the ball.Not so bummed that KOK retired as he was old but I totally agree that Kirk could have really brought in an up and coming QB coach or just someone who had some bona fides as a qb coach. We got nothing from what I and most of us know of. Brian's main QB coaching will probably be "you got to negotiate the safeties"
Ah yes the mysterious hiring of that Budmayr coach. Or whatever it is he is since he's not on the payroll. I suppose they are putting a lot of chips in that basket that he can mentor BF. I'd still be happier about it if they'd just have a QB coach on the payroll that can be hands on with the players as day to day as they can be. We don't need a QB guru helping BF we need one helping the QBs.Two things. Iowa has an alleged QB guru behind the scenes helping Brian as a volunteer. He is prohibited from directly coaching players, but ask Nebraska how hard that rule is enforced. Its a gray area. Legally though, he can assist BF in looking at tape and what to work on with the QBs in practice. He and BF are friends and I suspect he will have BF's ears on the QB race and development. I also imagine KF is paying him under the table somehow.
Second, you don't have to have been a QB to coach QBs. Indeed, very few coaches in football actually played whatever position they coach. Many didn't play at all. Coaching is about study and drive and ability. I believe Iowa has not developed QBs at an appropriate level because KF has not put sufficient resources into doing so. Iowa has needed a young QB guru in training who goes around to the other QB gurus and learns how to better teach fundamentals and reading defenses. KFs approach has been to just keep practicing harder. Developing QBs takes more coaching than any other position, and KF doesn't seem to get that from what we can see on the field and hear from our QBs once they leave the program.
And yet the last 3 draft enabled IA starting QBs have been selected:That all said, I think most fans think their QBs are average to dogshit. Especially in the West. There is a reason only about 10 QBs are drafted a year. Most college QBs are not awesome.
And I think just about every person on this board would have taken anyone of those 3 as the QB last year. This team may have run the table if it had a healthy Beatherd last season.And yet the last 3 draft enabled IA starting QBs have been selected:
Stanley
Beathard/Rudock
Yea - it probably hurts the argument I've seen here lately too that Iowa isn't recruiting well enough at QB. They're recruiting talent and just developing it enough to get drafted, but not good enough to play in the NFL.What has always struck me about Iowa's QBs is that they don't seem to get better. Tate and Stanley were about the same their sophomore seasons as their senior season. Rudock lost his job. Stanzi's career was all over the place, but his senior season was a big disappointment and his junior season, while the team was great, he was a turnover machine. Beatherd was hurt as he went along, but he didn't look great at times as a senior. I don't think anyone saw improvement out of Petras in year 2.
It just seems like there is a lack of progression in that room.
Preach...And I think just about every person on this board would have taken anyone of those 3 as the QB last year. This team may have run the table if it had a healthy Beatherd last season.
Stanzi was also drafted. Tate had a career after Iowa too. There have been some mild success stories in 20+ years under KF, and even a near miss Heisman candidate.
What has always struck me about Iowa's QBs is that they don't seem to get better. Tate and Stanley were about the same their sophomore seasons as their senior season. Rudock lost his job. Stanzi's career was all over the place, but his senior season was a big disappointment and his junior season, while the team was great, he was a turnover machine. Beatherd was hurt as he went along, but he didn't look great at times as a senior. I don't think anyone saw improvement out of Petras in year 2.
It just seems like there is a lack of progression in that room.
And I think just about every person on this board would have taken anyone of those 3 as the QB last year. This team may have run the table if it had a healthy Beatherd last season.
Stanzi was also drafted. Tate had a career after Iowa too. There have been some mild success stories in 20+ years under KF, and even a near miss Heisman candidate.
What has always struck me about Iowa's QBs is that they don't seem to get better. Tate and Stanley were about the same their sophomore seasons as their senior season. Rudock lost his job. Stanzi's career was all over the place, but his senior season was a big disappointment and his junior season, while the team was great, he was a turnover machine. Beatherd was hurt as he went along, but he didn't look great at times as a senior. I don't think anyone saw improvement out of Petras in year 2.
It just seems like there is a lack of progression in that room.
Fair take. Stanzi's stats were solid and he obviously got drafted, but the season as a whole was such a disappointment. Preseason ranked 9th and playoff contender to 7-5. Like it or lump it, the QB gets more blame and praise than he deserves. One could argue that a truly great QB finds a way to overcome. Then again, he did just that the year before despite throwing it to the other team a lot.I get that narrative, and narratives exist for a reason (there is usually some truth to them). But it can be really difficult to judge a QB's progression because it is so heavily influenced by the players around him.
The one I disagree with most strongly is Stanzi; he was unequivocally at his best as a senior.
View attachment 9006
That big statistical improvement is even masked somewhat. He had a QB rating of 170 through the first 8 games, but he dropped down to 120 over his last 5 games after losing his starting RB (A. Robinson) and both starting guards.
The biggest reason Stanzi is judged harshly for 2010 is because the defense failed to protect 4th quarter leads.
Imagine everything played out exactly the same that 2010 season, except...
Stanzi has the exact same stats (3004 yards, 64.1% completion %, 25 TD/6 int), and did not do a thing differently. But the defense came through, and now Iowa is 11-1. People would call that one of the greatest QB seasons in Iowa history.
- Iowa did not give up the fake punt vs. Wisc OR stopped Wisc on the 4th and 5 they converted on their game-winning drive
- Iowa did not give up 2 long TD drives to NW in the 4th quarter
- Iowa did not allow a 4th and 10 conversion on a Terrell Pryor scramble vs. OSU
- Iowa did not allow a go-ahead TD drive vs. MN in the 4th
NO ONE would be saying, "I know his stats are good and the team was 11-1, but my eyes are telling me he just was not as good as 2009 when he threw for 2417 yards with 56.3% completion and 17/15 TD/Int."
Yeah for as frustrating as it was for him to throw so many picks we also knew that he and that offense were apt to march right back down and score after that. With Petras we have no such confidence in that... To the point where it's almost a fluke when they convert a big play. (that play against PSU to Ragini comes to mind) Petras doesn't throw interceptions at a terrible rate but the guy can't convert a 3rd and 8 to save his life either. At some point you have to have confidence in your QB to make plays and through 2 full seasons of Petras I can't see how anybody would.Fair take. Stanzi's stats were solid and he obviously got drafted, but the season as a whole was such a disappointment. Preseason ranked 9th and playoff contender to 7-5. Like it or lump it, the QB gets more blame and praise than he deserves. One could argue that a truly great QB finds a way to overcome. Then again, he did just that the year before despite throwing it to the other team a lot.
We would all kill to have another Stanzi in the QB room right now.