99topdawg
Well-Known Member
Who does this?
The mighty huskers. When I went to college out there, I had a friend who's mom worked there and he could get tickets anytime, because there were almost always some left over.
Who does this?
that claim seems suspect at bestThe mighty huskers. When I went to college out there, I had a friend who's mom worked there and he could get tickets anytime, because there were almost always some left over.
that claim seems suspect at best
link?Its pretty well known that nebraska does this. most husker fans i know admit to it, but they dont see the problem cuz well they are nebraska fans
that claim seems suspect at best
I dont think you used "let me google that for you" correctly. it provided no information pertinent the discussion.
I was at the game too. The jumbotron did say that the attendance was 69,xxx. I never saw them retract that. There were a lot of empty seats all around the stadium. There was a large block in the middle of the east side, down low, behind the ULM line that was unfilled for a while. Not sure why. Outside before the game there were a lot of people selling tickets along with the usual ticket pushers, and they had more than six tickets at a time they were selling. I think many decided not to come to this game and sold to the scalpers....so they were sold once maybe, but then they didn't resell which equaled empty seats in the stands.
Overall I thought the crowd was kind of blah for this game...especially in the "A" zone.
The crowd was very blah in the W zone. ALot of people must normally around me must have gave their tickets to their parents or something
Dolph said it was a sellout right at kickoff, said people bought them up right up to the game.
Pre-game he said there were tickets available, but then before kick said all remaining tickets were bought.
UI game notes released today list Sat's attendance at 70,585.
Someone said something about tickets being given away at the game?!? Never seen or heard of that before. Any truth to that?
I dont think you used "let me google that for you" correctly. it provided no information pertinent the discussion.