If we lose Jaleel Johnson...

pmchawk said:
I don't think a recruit would decide not to come because of an investigation, but the University President's actions could. Being suspended do to an investigation of an incident that occurred in IC when you were traveling with the team would make me question the University President's ability to run the institution and not cause a recruit's name to be smeared by snap reactions. It does show the University sets completely different standards for the football team then the rest of the student body.
Click to expand...

Have you looked at the timeline? There is no question if he was there or not. He was.
 
pmchawk said:
I don't think a recruit would decide not to come because of an investigation, but the University President's actions could. Being suspended do to an investigation of an incident that occurred in IC when you were traveling with the team would make me question the University President's ability to run the institution and not cause a recruit's name to be smeared by snap reactions. It does show the University sets completely different standards for the football team then the rest of the student body.
Click to expand...

is this another of your posts filled with sarcasm? or did you get with the 2012 Matlock aspiring attorney aka herbyhawk prior to writing this post?
 
I am more than worried it would be than Johnson that decommitts, Ekakitie and Fleming are in that little group
not to mention future recruits in the Chicago area could be affected especially if someone give me a straight answer to my post i started concerning what is the procedure for away games
 
herbyhawk said:
I am more than worried it would be than Johnson that decommitts, Ekakitie and Fleming are in that little group
not to mention future recruits in the Chicago area could be affected especially if someone give me a straight answer to my post i started concerning what is the procedure for away games
Click to expand...

dude - the timeline is out there. the procedure for away games has no bearing.
 
imported_ankle23 said:
is this another of your posts filled with sarcasm? or did you get with the 2012 Matlock aspiring attorney aka herbyhawk prior to writing this post?
Click to expand...

:) I didn't realize I had ever tried to use sarcasm in any of my posts. I was speaking my opinion.

Hypothetical: If you had made a decision on where you are going to play and a current player is suspended for being charged with something and is found guilty, it would be natural to think, "I wont put myself in that situation". However if this player is suspended after said investigation has been dropped, and the player wasn't even in the same state when the incident occurred because they were with the team. I would feel uncertain about my decision.
 
pmchawk said:
:) I didn't realize I had ever tried to use sarcasm in any of my posts. I was speaking my opinion.

Hypothetical: If you had made a decision on where you are going to play and a current player is suspended for being charged with something and is found guilty, it would be natural to think, "I wont put myself in that situation". However if this player is suspended after said investigation has been dropped, and the player wasn't even in the same state when the incident occurred because they were with the team. I would feel uncertain about my decision.
Click to expand...

your argument is wrong because he clearly was with the team. have you seen the timeline of events? the a.m./p.m. thing was a typo.
 
if the bus leaves at 12:00 to get to the airport and the incident occurred between 1:15 and 1:30 he could not have been there

oh wait Coker took a cab to the airport because he told KF he had something to do at his resident yea right
 
herbyhawk said:
if the bus leaves at 12:00 to get to the airport and the incident occurred between 1:15 and 1:30 he could not have been there

oh wait Coker took a cab to the airport because he told KF he had something to do at his resident yea right
Click to expand...

do you understand the subtlety of a.m. v. p.m.?
 
herbyhawk said:
if the bus leaves at 12:00 to get to the airport and the incident occurred between 1:15 and 1:30 he could not have been there

oh wait Coker took a cab to the airport because he told KF he had something to do at his resident yea right
Click to expand...

Give it a rest hh.
 
herbyhawk said:
if the bus leaves at 12:00 to get to the airport and the incident occurred between 1:15 and 1:30 he could not have been there

oh wait Coker took a cab to the airport because he told KF he had something to do at his resident yea right
Click to expand...

Wow. I guess it is safe to say you don't have a future in anything that requires reading skills or comprehension.
 
imported_ankle23 said:
the event happened in the a.m (1:30). the flight took off in the p.m (2:30).
Click to expand...

that does change things, though I have seen other rumors that I haven't seen stated. but seeing as an actual article screwed up am vs pm I'd rather not been spreading rumors. just my opinion based on incorrect facts.. :)
 
pmchawk said:
that does change things, though I have seen other rumors that I haven't seen stated. but seeing as an actual article screwed up am vs pm I'd rather not been spreading rumors. just my opinion based on incorrect facts.. :)
Click to expand...

rumors, rumors, rumors. we all got 'em.

if it were only rumors, speculation and accusation, this staff would have been fired by the internet athletic director years ago...

:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Share this page

Top