kicker22
Well-Known Member
Bama had 3 losses and I'm not a Bama fan by any means, but Bama's win against Georgia is far superior to any win on ND's schedule. I agree that Iowa is a better team, but we had our chances as well and came up short. My argument is that I think Bama should be in but rather if it came down to Miami, ND, and Bama in my opinion it's blatantly obvious that ND should be left out and rightfully so. Do I believe there's a bias toward the SEC in the polls absolutely. But ND's schedule was an absolute embarrassment. You ask who I think would belong over ND? I honestly think Texas or BYU had a better resume and argument then either ND or Bama.
I'm not going to sit here and hide the fact that I despise ND. They played a Charmin soft schedule, they lost their two biggest games, they beat two teams ranked 20-25, while demolishing absolute bottom feeders the remainder of the way. It is their own fault they didn't have one more chance to secure a win against a top 20 team, but refuse to join a conference. Why should they get preferential treatment?
I'm not going to sit here and hide the fact that I despise ND. They played a Charmin soft schedule, they lost their two biggest games, they beat two teams ranked 20-25, while demolishing absolute bottom feeders the remainder of the way. It is their own fault they didn't have one more chance to secure a win against a top 20 team, but refuse to join a conference. Why should they get preferential treatment?