This thread reeks of "it's OK to be mediocre....we're Iowa"
After driving 1590 miles over 72 hours, and spending hundreds of dollars to go to the PSU game and watching us lay an egg, uh, NO, it's not "OK" to accept we lost because we're rebuilding.
We stunk. Same defensive schemes that are not stopping the opponent at critical times, the offense going back into the tank, no changing of the gameplan when it was clearly needed, silly mistakes over and over.
Although now ranked, PSU is a very very average team.
That puts our performance at well below average. We had no business losing to that team on Saturday.
This thread reeks of "it's OK to be mediocre....we're Iowa"
absolutely. great post.If the Texas' and Florida's of the world go through a rough year from time to time with 5* talent how is it realistic that Iowa won't have the same thing happen to them when we get mainly 3* talent and depend a lot on development?
...it happens..its more frustrating when you think more could have been done.
After watching the game again, I saw a lot more missed plays than I did live, or rather, more evidence of lack of execution that hurt this team...then again, you may argue that the style of offense Iowa chose to run and when it chose it could have contributed to that.
This year is likely going to be up and down...doubting we see consistency.
It is a rebuilding year, something most everyone acknowledged before the season.
I looked up a couple other teams...
Counting the 2010 season and the portion of this season that is in the books, Iowa and the Florida Gators have seven losses (Florida has one more win and has played one more game so far this year than Iowa). Texas has eight losses. Texas missed a bowl game last year and finished 5-7.
I guess other programs (and better programs) have rebuilding years too. It doesn't make the losses feel any better, though.
This thread reeks of "it's OK to be mediocre....we're Iowa"
If the Texas' and Florida's of the world go through a rough year from time to time with 5* talent how is it realistic that Iowa won't have the same thing happen to them when we get mainly 3* talent and depend a lot on development?
I keep hearing all this blabber about what style Iowa ran yesterday.
Its nonsense, complete and utter nonsense.
A complete disregard for reality.
When this vaunted no huddle was used, Iowa generated what exactly?
1 drive worth a crap for 3 pts, aided by a penalty IIRC.
Everyone has now seen Iowa's vaunted no huddle & I have news for you, it doesn't scare anyone. Jam the receivers, blitz the backers and play 2 deep safeties.
I'll go on record saying that any game(s) Iowa wins from here out this season, it will be because they run the ball better than they have, not because of this vaunted no huddle 311 package that people are enamored with.
NW is gonna blitz the crap out of Iowa, stack the box, because they always do and it always works.
...it happens..its more frustrating when you think more could have been done.
After watching the game again, I saw a lot more missed plays than I did live, or rather, more evidence of lack of execution that hurt this team...then again, you may argue that the style of offense Iowa chose to run and when it chose it could have contributed to that.
This year is likely going to be up and down...doubting we see consistency.
It is a rebuilding year, something most everyone acknowledged before the season.
I looked up a couple other teams...
Counting the 2010 season and the portion of this season that is in the books, Iowa and the Florida Gators have seven losses (Florida has one more win and has played one more game so far this year than Iowa). Texas has eight losses. Texas missed a bowl game last year and finished 5-7.
I guess other programs (and better programs) have rebuilding years too. It doesn't make the losses feel any better, though.
When this vaunted no huddle was used, Iowa generated what exactly?