Heard that coaches said that...
- Thread starter NCHawker
- Start date
WinOneThisCentury
Well-Known Member
It could also force Rudock to make plays down the field. He knows if he checks down and we don't move the ball, CJ is in the game. If I'm Rudock, I'm going to go out there and play to win...and try to make plays because I want to be the guy.
I think at this point KF and GD feel that Rudock hasn't done anything wrong to lose his job and they want to be fair...but they also realize that CJ has major upside...and this is how they migrate to CJ. In other words, they are spineless losers that are afraid to make a difficult decision that may impact a player that took them to a bowl game last year.
I think at this point KF and GD feel that Rudock hasn't done anything wrong to lose his job and they want to be fair...but they also realize that CJ has major upside...and this is how they migrate to CJ. In other words, they are spineless losers that are afraid to make a difficult decision that may impact a player that took them to a bowl game last year.
BlindDogScooter
Well-Known Member
Thank God you weren't coaching the Hawks when Brad Banks lost to ISU...
It's really kinda hard to judge if 2 qb systems work or not. Take Northwestern for instance. They aren't really a very good team whether they play one qb or two so it's hard to pin the losses on the fact that they play two. There is no way to know if they would have ended up being a better team had they just picked one and went with it.
We have already lost to a really bad team this year using just one qb so I doubt using two can make us look much worse than we did the first 3 weeks. If we lose a game people can say it's because we never gave our qb a chance to get into the flow of the game, but it's just as easy to say we won a game because we gave the other guy a chance early on and he caught fire. Who knows how much this would change the final record.
We have already lost to a really bad team this year using just one qb so I doubt using two can make us look much worse than we did the first 3 weeks. If we lose a game people can say it's because we never gave our qb a chance to get into the flow of the game, but it's just as easy to say we won a game because we gave the other guy a chance early on and he caught fire. Who knows how much this would change the final record.
Yea right! We win the Orange Bowl for sure if Kirk pulls the trigger on Chandler after ISU! Carson Palmer should thank Kirk because that decision is the only reason he has a Heisman.
That's kinda what I was thinking. It might force Rudock to be more aggressive and that might be a good thing for him. On the other hand, it might force him to play beyond his abilities. Maybe he doesn't throw those medium/long passes because he knows his limitations. I think Rudock would be much better off in a traditional I formation type offense with playaction. He could make those types of medium/long throws. CJB has enough talent to overcome the certain blitz in the spread and hit a strike into a small window.
RedFieldHawk
Active Member
I couldn't care less about a rotation. As a fan, I want to see the team win. I also want an exciting game...at that point CJB gives fans something to cheer for. I also think he gives Iowa the best chance to win. I want CJB as the starter.
GesterHawk
Well-Known Member
So you and others wouldn't cheer for the Hawks if Jake is in the game?
