Hawktalk tonight

iahawk20

Well-Known Member
Some interesting calls tonight....holy cow. Folks are certainly not pleased with some of the time management issues. ESPNU also in the house doing a segment for college gameday on Saturday.

On spiking the ball at the end of the 1st half---- Kirk basically said they wanted to try and save the timeouts

On not blitzing more---said our D has been pretty successful over the years with our current philosophy

On the offensive struggles-----comes down to execution


Recent caller defended Kirk and staff saying how spoiled Iowa fans have become.
 
Adam and Colin being injured....both have a chance to play. Both practiced today and are gaining ground. "Hopeful to have them on Saturday"


Caller just told Kirk to run the pistol and blitz more.....Kirk simply responds "probably not".
 
Adam and Colin being injured....both have a chance to play. Both practiced today and are gaining ground. "Hopeful to have them on Saturday"


Caller just told Kirk to run the pistol and blitz more.....Kirk simply responds "probably not".

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A]YouTube - The Price is Right losing horn[/ame]
 
Adam and Colin being injured....both have a chance to play. Both practiced today and are gaining ground. "Hopeful to have them on Saturday"


Caller just told Kirk to run the pistol and blitz more.....Kirk simply responds "probably not".

implied-facepalm.jpg
 
I don't get the chance to listen to Hawk Talk, but if these reports are true, I'm even more disappointed than I was last weekend.

#1. The timeout at the end of the second quarter is indefensible. When a team is in the red zone, they need as many opportunities to score as possible. You're on a short field, and there is no reason to save timeouts, especially on a first down after the clock has stopped to move chain. 39 seconds is an eternity in modern football, especially in college. I'm sorry to hear KF defend this. It was a mistake, and a costly one at that. Not to mention that both play calls after the spike stopped the clock. The coaching staff was not prepared to deal with the situation, period. I guess KF is going to muddle through these situations the rest of his career. It's a shame, and it will cost the Hawks year after year. Heck, after watching the B10 replay of last year's OSU game, you could argue that it cost them the B10 championship and a Rose Bowl last year. I'm not that harsh, but you could make the argument...

#2. Calling Iowa's fan base spoiled is a cover, and I know KF didn't say this, but I'd be very disappointed if he corroborated this statement with silence. Iowa has had success, sure. But the football program and the University had a huge part in stoking expectation this year. Remember... Anyone, anytime, anywhere?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLBstbt8xJ4]YouTube - GoHawks.com Intro 2010[/ame]

I have supported KF from the beginning. I defended him in the beginning of his tenure to many critics because I liked the football professionalism I witnessed in his program that he brought from his NFL experiences. I identified with his ethics and honesty, and still do. But if you're going to walk the walk and talk the talk... you have to be prepared to face criticism when you fail, with honesty and thoughtfulness. To defend blatant mistakes is irresponsible to the program, it's fans and the institution. Any fan of Hawkeye athletics deserves better, even spoiled ones.
 
Some interesting calls tonight....holy cow. Folks are certainly not pleased with some of the time management issues. ESPNU also in the house doing a segment for college gameday on Saturday.

On spiking the ball at the end of the 1st half---- Kirk basically said they wanted to try and save the timeouts

On not blitzing more---said our D has been pretty successful over the years with our current philosophy

On the offensive struggles-----comes down to execution


Recent caller defended Kirk and staff saying how spoiled Iowa fans have become.

As the OC on my son's flag football team I completely agree with Kirk. Our team's offensive struggles were ALWAYS due to lack of execution.:cool:
 
I don't get the chance to listen to Hawk Talk, but if these reports are true, I'm even more disappointed than I was last weekend.

#1. The timeout at the end of the second quarter is indefensible. When a team is in the red zone, they need as many opportunities to score as possible. You're on a short field, and there is no reason to save timeouts, especially on a first down after the clock has stopped to move chain. 39 seconds is an eternity in modern football, especially in college. I'm sorry to hear KF defend this. It was a mistake, and a costly one at that. Not to mention that both play calls after the spike stopped the clock. The coaching staff was not prepared to deal with the situation, period. I guess KF is going to muddle through these situations the rest of his career. It's a shame, and it will cost the Hawks year after year. Heck, after watching the B10 replay of last year's OSU game, you could argue that it cost them the B10 championship and a Rose Bowl last year. I'm not that harsh, but you could make the argument...

#2. Calling Iowa's fan base spoiled is a cover, and I know KF didn't say this, but I'd be very disappointed if he corroborated this statement with silence. Iowa has had success, sure. But the football program and the University had a huge part in stoking expectation this year. Remember... Anyone, anytime, anywhere?

YouTube - GoHawks.com Intro 2010

I have supported KF from the beginning. I defended him in the beginning of his tenure to many critics because I liked the football professionalism I witnessed in his program that he brought from his NFL experiences. I identified with his ethics and honesty, and still do. But if you're going to walk the walk and talk the talk... you have to be prepared to face criticism when you fail, with honesty and thoughtfulness. To defend blatant mistakes is irresponsible to the program, it's fans and the institution. Any fan of Hawkeye athletics deserves better, even spoiled ones.

What do you expect? Kirk isn't going to change. Ever.
 
I don't get the chance to listen to Hawk Talk, but if these reports are true, I'm even more disappointed than I was last weekend.

#1. The timeout at the end of the second quarter is indefensible. When a team is in the red zone, they need as many opportunities to score as possible. You're on a short field, and there is no reason to save timeouts, especially on a first down after the clock has stopped to move chain. 39 seconds is an eternity in modern football, especially in college. I'm sorry to hear KF defend this. It was a mistake, and a costly one at that. Not to mention that both play calls after the spike stopped the clock. The coaching staff was not prepared to deal with the situation, period. I guess KF is going to muddle through these situations the rest of his career. It's a shame, and it will cost the Hawks year after year. Heck, after watching the B10 replay of last year's OSU game, you could argue that it cost them the B10 championship and a Rose Bowl last year. I'm not that harsh, but you could make the argument...

#2. Calling Iowa's fan base spoiled is a cover, and I know KF didn't say this, but I'd be very disappointed if he corroborated this statement with silence. Iowa has had success, sure. But the football program and the University had a huge part in stoking expectation this year. Remember... Anyone, anytime, anywhere?

YouTube - GoHawks.com Intro 2010

I have supported KF from the beginning. I defended him in the beginning of his tenure to many critics because I liked the football professionalism I witnessed in his program that he brought from his NFL experiences. I identified with his ethics and honesty, and still do. But if you're going to walk the walk and talk the talk... you have to be prepared to face criticism when you fail, with honesty and thoughtfulness. To defend blatant mistakes is irresponsible to the program, it's fans and the institution. Any fan of Hawkeye athletics deserves better, even spoiled ones.

1) Ohio State last year was not an example of mismanagement of the clock. Ferentz did with the clock exactly what he wanted to do: drained it and headed for OT. You may not like the decision, but it is not a similar mistake to that in Evanston last week, or the Wisconsin game earlier.

2) Take a step back. Our losses have been frustrating for sure. But you were right to defend Ferentz early in his tenure, and you'd be right to do it now. He doesn't shy away from expectations, but he protects his players when expectations are not met. Our program is best off in his hands, even if they are not perfect.
 
1) Ohio State last year was not an example of mismanagement of the clock. Ferentz did with the clock exactly what he wanted to do: drained it and headed for OT. You may not like the decision, but it is not a similar mistake to that in Evanston last week, or the Wisconsin game earlier.

2) Take a step back. Our losses have been frustrating for sure. But you were right to defend Ferentz early in his tenure, and you'd be right to do it now. He doesn't shy away from expectations, but he protects his players when expectations are not met. Our program is best off in his hands, even if they are not perfect.

Considering that the majority of the criticism is not directed at the players, that's not the best argument. I don't see how he can defend the clock mis-management. But that's a problem that's been around for 12 years, it's probably not ever going to change.
 
Top