CraigTNelson
Well-Known Member
Who is Iowa's best pass rusher?
I completely agree with DiNardo's middle of the road assessment. There are too many unknowns going into the season to consider much else, in my opinion.
Davis and KMM have both shown flashes but not yet the consistency to be a number one receiver. Running back is a blank slate going into the season. Who's to say what we'll have there. We lost our best OL. DL is going to be challenged all year long which is going to put pressure on our entire defense to compensate. Add into that the coordinator changes and there are questions everywhere save QB.
I have a hard time looking at our schedule and putting a definite 'W' next to any game.
If we don't start 5-0 I will be upset.
Even with all the question marks, I still think it would be a disappointment to do worse than 7-5. Herb might have a point about Rogers at rb as well. The Air Force transfer Weisman can play this year, so if he can play well at fb, Rogers would be another possibility at rb. Also, Nate Meier may surprise everyone when he starts out at rb and we have a new monsterback in the making. I also liked DiNardo's comment about the defense. Maybe Phil will bring a little fire back into it. He certainly had it as a player.The schedule almost prevents Iowa from anything worse than 6-6. Iowa would have to try hard to suck to get below that.
So saying KD hasn't been consistant is considered bashing him.... #herbyspeak
I completely agree with DiNardo's middle of the road assessment. There are too many unknowns going into the season to consider much else, in my opinion.
Davis and KMM have both shown flashes but not yet the consistency to be a number one receiver. Running back is a blank slate going into the season. Who's to say what we'll have there. We lost our best OL. DL is going to be challenged all year long which is going to put pressure on our entire defense to compensate. Add into that the coordinator changes and there are questions everywhere save QB.
I have a hard time looking at our schedule and putting a definite 'W' next to any game.
heres one i will find others
i already did, McNutt had his share of drops both as a senior and a JR, i even remember a perfectly thrown ball go thru McNutts hand as a JR that led to a INT and a TD for the other team, And people keep saying JVB is now a poor QB , so how many of those drops can be blamed on JVB instead of Davis.
like i said how many more catches did Davis have to have to be classified as consistent enough to be the solid #1 WR going into this fall?
not to mention KMM had more reception as a 3rd option as a RS freshmen, than Sandeman did as a Senior. the WR are solid and ther is no reason to doubt their ability to be solid, alot of the poster act like this Team has little to no talent. and they act like the coaches are 1st year coaches with no experience
o by the way enlighten me as to what McNutts rates were as a jr and senior
so you discount the 9 catches out of 10 to try to make a very feeble point. i will take a 90% catch rate anyday. this is not Baseball where a batting avg of .300 is considered great. 90% of catches is excellent that make 90 out of 100, not sure what you consider acceptable #'s
I agree with this. I don't understand the doom and gloom around here. I think the staff shake up is going to reenergize them and get this team back to a top Big10 team.I know this sounds crazy, but the only game in the first 9 games that would be a sure loss would be MSU...and I'm looking forward to seeing them without Cousins. They can line up and smash mouth us and that could be a major weakness for us...physical teams with the patience to make you stop the run. Iowa will put 8 in the box against Penn State and force them to throw to beat us. Their QB couldn't throw it in the ocean last year (outside of McGloin who is gone). We should be in every game in the first 9...outside of MSU if they are playing well.
As I said, each to their own. If you consider a catch rate of 87% (let's be accurate) of catchable balls (not to be misinterpreted as total balls) acceptable and strong numbers for a wide receiver, so be it.
Doesn't change my opinion. A drop rate in excess of 13% is not the drop rate of an elite WR and not someone I want to have to rely on in crunch time. I will consider Davis a strong number one when that number improves.
answer my queston what were McNutts #'s as a JR and SR. i am very interested since you claim McNutt was a sure #1 and use those #'s against Davis to try to say he's has a lot to prove himself as being ready to step into that #1 spot. is that so hard to do?