Disagree. To this outsider it was illuminating to see the numbers on the investments in other sports relative to basketball. I'm also left with a number of questions about use of CHA and whether some of the non-revenue producing programs couldn't be accomodated elsewhere.
The Athletics Department has clearly dropped the ball on basketball. As much as I hate to agree with Alford on anything, I am beginning to think he's correct that Iowa is a football school, at least as far as where the money was spent before and during his time there ... and afterwards. We're 30 points down and playing catch-up.
The problems run much deeper than the current coach, his style of play, ability to recruit, lack of connection with the fanbase, etc.
I guess i was saying it wasnt groundbreaking because Ive seen all the numbers many times before, and the money spent on football is always going to be greater than basketball for obvious reasons
I was under the impression that they built the rowing house almost entirely from private donations from a women who said the money could only be used for rowing. The article states that the women donor only gave 1 million towards a building that cost 7.5 million.
I don't know if it was Barta or Bowlsby that approved this but they literally should be kicked in the nuts until they pass out. Rowing already costs the University 1.8 million dollars annually (scholarships, coach salary and travel). There is not one highschool rowing program within 1,000 miles of Iowa. The vast majority of girls on scholarship never have even rowed for fun (I knew several). Yet we spend 6.5 million on this sport while completely neglecting 6 others (including three other women's sports) that Iowa fans actually care about and have Iowa highschool athletes competing in them.
This is so dumb it is hard to comprehend.
I also know a woman who used to be on the team. Was from out of state...read an add wanting women to "compete" for the team. Showed up, had never rowed in her life and earned a full scholarship.
Title IX at work