Agree. The best way to negate a quick (but light) pass rusher is to run the ball right at him.Put both Wieting and Ross in as blockers and run it right at his happy ass plenty of times.
Agree. The best way to negate a quick (but light) pass rusher is to run the ball right at him.[/QUOT
The problem with that is if you watch his film, he has the ability to pancake much bigger offensive linemen including Nebraska's left tackle.Agree. The best way to negate a quick (but light) pass rusher is to run the ball right at him.
The key words there are "Nebraska's left tackle".The problem with that is if you watch his film, he has the ability to pancake much bigger offensive linemen including Nebraska's left tackle.
NIU is 57 in RPI
What some are saying us that a solid P5 program having weeks to preoare for the loss of several players is going to struggle with the 57th ranked team. There are only 73 teams rsnked lower.
The game is at Iowa.
NIU has key losses of players themselves.
What you really are aaying is that KF isnt a very good coach.
This is s good test to see where KF really is.
This is no trap game. This is the real deal.
If Iowa is a good program hsving weeks to prep non starters is adequate if the talent is there.
If Iowa loses we have a solid answer about the state of the program. If this was a team wuth a new qb playing at Dekalb the storyline would be different.
NIIU starts 2 sophs and a Frosh on O and have 2 each on 2nd team.
The 2nd team D has 4 frosh and a soph.
On D they are experienced starting on D but drops off.
From the years I have watched Iowa they shouldn't underestimate any opponent or take anyone lightly. They have a tendency to play down to teams and also a tendency to come out flat at home on some of these games. If they can control the turnovers and break tendencies they will win.
A 60ish RPI team beating a 20ish RPI team is not unusual. 10 pt underdogs win about 25-30% of the time. Under Carey, NIU has played 5 games vs. B1G, beating Iowa, Purdue, NW, and Nebraska and losing to #1 ranked OSU by 7. A loss in this game is not a final referendum on the team this year, or on KF's overall coaching acumen.
A loss would be frustrating and disappointing, and it would not be a good omen, but this is certainly not the Sisters of the Poor we are talking about. Conversely, a win, especially a convincing one, will mean a lot against this opponent.
A 60ish RPI team beating a 20ish RPI team is not unusual. 10 pt underdogs win about 25-30% of the time. Under Carey, NIU has played 5 games vs. B1G, beating Iowa, Purdue, NW, and Nebraska and losing to #1 ranked OSU by 7. A loss in this game is not a final referendum on the team this year, or on KF's overall coaching acumen.
A loss would be frustrating and disappointing, and it would not be a good omen, but this is certainly not the Sisters of the Poor we are talking about. Conversely, a win, especially a convincing one, will mean a lot against this opponent.
So you really dont think Iowa is strong.
I don't Iowa is a sure-fire top 10, national championship contender. That type of a team would not have to worry about NIU that much (ignoring that fact that they took #1 OSU down to the wire). I think Iowa is a legit top-20 team, and I am excited to see if they can prove they are more. A top 20 team absolutely needs to take a top 60 team seriously and could lose with some bad luck or a bad game-plan.
If Iowa loses the game, it will be due to some combination of poor planning (coaches), poor play (players), and poor luck. But none of those things leads directly to either, 1) KF is a bad coach, or 2) the 2018 team is a bad team.
The constant excuse making about how good a MAC team is is like the most Iowa fan thing to do ever. We should win this game period.I don't Iowa is a sure-fire top 10, national championship contender. That type of a team would not have to worry about NIU that much (ignoring that fact that they took #1 OSU down to the wire). I think Iowa is a legit top-20 team, and I am excited to see if they can prove they are more. A top 20 team absolutely needs to take a top 60 team seriously and could lose with some bad luck or a bad game-plan.
If Iowa loses the game, it will be due to some combination of poor planning (coaches), poor play (players), and poor luck. But none of those things leads directly to either, 1) KF is a bad coach, or 2) the 2018 team is a bad team.
Im thinking that if it is because of poor coaching or poor play then maybe he isnt a good coach. Plenty of time to get ready. If you cant get ready for this team with some much time it becomes a conclusion at least until he beats Wisky or PSU. Then we are back to wondering what he is. Thats why I think this game will likely show who he is.
Personally looking for a solid win.
The constant excuse making about how good a MAC team is is like the most Iowa fan thing to do ever. We should win this game period.
I look for more creative play calling too. I think BF will take more shots downfield and be less predictable. We have weapons all over the place for him to be creative with. I don't think we'll be a run on 1st and 2nd down throw on 3rd kinda team all the time. I think we'll see more passing to setup the run. I love using draw plays. I wish we'd have seen more of them for Wadley during his time. By playing the game more that way your running game becomes more efficient and effective I think anyway..The real difference that some of you are missing is that BF is calling the plays not KF. I believe BF is more aggressive in his play calling than KF ever was. The game will start out slowly but the Hawks will wear them out in the second half. Not even close.
Iowa 42 NIU 9
You can't really be so simplistic as to think one poorly coached game makes one a poor coach, can you (see Stoops and Peterson examples in my post above)?