Again, I said I have no idea if it would or would not put the Big 10 behind any other conference. Largest alumni base doesn't necessarily mean largest fan following. I graduated from Iowa but most of my friends didn't and they're still die hard Hawk fans...
I'm just saying the population density in other conferences territories is much larger. Thus I would assume that means they have more potential for customers to "opt in" (both alumni and non-alumni). The size of the stadium really has nothing to do with how many people are tuning in on their television or in the future their "network". They do currently have the largest network contracts but that could also change depending on what method they have to use to make their programs accessible to viewers.
I don't doubt that the Big 10 will always remain towards the top because we have an incredibly dedicated fan base. I'm just saying if other conferences can figure out how to gain equal or greater footing than the big 10 financially it will be interesting to see if or how they adjust.
I don't know why I am arguing with you, you clearly don't get it. The B10 already has the largest tv contract, even before the BTN. Why do you think that is? Audience. Size of the stadium doesn't matter? You don't think that shows an indication of fan support? I don't think Colorado could fill Michigan Stadium, why do you think that is? Alumni base doesn't indicate fan support? Who have the largest alumni bases in the country? Michigan, OSU, PSU and Texas. You don't think they have the largest non-alumni fan bases too?
The method they have to use in the future will be the same one everyone will have to use, so that is irrelevant. The only conference that could argue their fans are as passionate as the B10's is the SEC, no other conference can. That will not change.