Funky comparison: 2011 vs 2010 recruiting

H

homerHAWKeye777

Well-Known Member
The parallels are pretty remarkable.

Roughly, at this point in time last year, Iowa had:

- 9 recruits
- 1 four-star guy, 7 three-star guys, and 1 two-star guy
- the aforementioned 9 recruits hailed from 6 different states
- big "need"-areas in recruiting had already been hit pretty hard with nice success (particularly at LB and DL)
- the lone 4-star recruit was an OL-recruit

Now, when you look at the current 2011 class ....

- 10 recruits
- 1 four-star guy, 8 three-star guys, and 1 two-star guy (using scout ratings to fill the gaps)
- the 10 recruits hail from 8 different states
- big "need"-areas in recruiting had already been hit pretty hard with nice success (particularly at WR and TE)
- the lone 4-star recruit was an OL-recruit
 
homerHAWKeye777 said:
The parallels are pretty remarkable.

Roughly, at this point in time last year, Iowa had:

- 9 recruits
- 1 four-star guy, 7 three-star guys, and 1 two-star guy
- the aforementioned 9 recruits hailed from 6 different states
- big "need"-areas in recruiting had already been hit pretty hard with nice success (particularly at LB and DL)
- the lone 4-star recruit was an OL-recruit

Now, when you look at the current 2011 class ....

- 10 recruits
- 1 four-star guy, 8 three-star guys, and 1 two-star guy (using scout ratings to fill the gaps)
- the 10 recruits hail from 8 different states
- big "need"-areas in recruiting had already been hit pretty hard with nice success (particularly at WR and TE)
- the lone 4-star recruit was an OL-recruit
Click to expand...

Can we assume another BCS bowl game as well, Homer???:D
 
I liked last year recruits and this year is shaping up nicely. The early start is a nice bridge until we start seeing games.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Share this page

Top