I'm curious how Fry and Ferentz compare in both recruitment and player development.
My hunch is that Fry was a better recruiter, while Ferentz/Doyle develop players better.
Any opinions or statistics out there that can shed some light?
Wisco JUST WENT with two conf. losses.I suppose at the end of the day you look at results. Because no matter how good of a coach you are, you are only as good as your talent on the field.
Ferentz has finished in the top 10 4 times in his tenure with one BCS level bowl victory, in a day and age of the 85 scholarship limit.
Fry went to 3 Rose Bowls, but getting to a Rose Bowl was a bit easier in that era compared to now. Example Fry's first team went to the Rose Bowl with an 8-3 record with losses to Minnesota and ISU. No way a 2 conference loss big ten team goes to the rose bowl today.
Fry finished ranked #10 twice in the AP. No final finishes in the top 10 for his entire Iowa career.
Finally, Fry didn't have to deal with Penn State for the majority of his career, and NW and ISU were horrible programs for the majority of his time at iowa.
. Maybe Kirk will go after the LSU offensive coordinator...the option didn't work the first 10 times, let's run it 10 more and maybe we can get a first down? maybe kok isn't so bad after all...Ferentz is much better at identifying talent and developing it. He has put way more players in the NFL. Fry was a better game day coach. Give Fry the same talent and we would see far far less losses to inferior opponents. Fry was smart enough to have Bill Snyder, who is/was the best coach of the three, as his O coordinator while Kirk holds on to KOK, a guy who no one else would even take for free. Ferentz could be a great coach if he would hire a good O coordinator and then just get out of his way.
. Maybe Kirk will go after the LSU offensive coordinator...the option didn't work the first 10 times, let's run it 10 more and maybe we can get a first down? maybe kok isn't so bad after all...
First, Kirk isn't going after anyone, ever.
Second, that comparison based on one game is (fill in the blank) incredibly stupid.
It seems to me that Fry recruited from where he was from- the south. Ferentz tends to look to Penn area and east coast. Ferentz needs to hire a strong southern DC who can recruit against SEC.
There's no room for improvement? Sounds sensible to me!Seriously, where do people pull this crap from. Our defensive recruiting and development have hardly been problematic under Ferentz.
Ferentz is much better at identifying talent and developing it. He has put way more players in the NFL.
Fry was a better game day coach. Give Fry the same talent and we would see far far less losses to inferior opponents.
Fry was smart enough to have Bill Snyder, who is/was the best coach of the three, as his O coordinator while Kirk holds on to KOK, a guy who no one else would even take for free.
Ferentz could be a great coach if he would hire a good O coordinator and then just get out of his way.
It seems to me that Fry recruited from where he was from- the south. Ferentz tends to look to Penn area and east coast. Ferentz needs to hire a strong southern DC who can recruit against SEC.
Ferentz is much better at identifying talent and developing it. He has put way more players in the NFL.
Fry was a better game day coach. Give Fry the same talent and we would see far far less losses to inferior opponents.
Fry was smart enough to have Bill Snyder, who is/was the best coach of the three, as his O coordinator while Kirk holds on to KOK, a guy who no one else would even take for free.
Ferentz could be a great coach if he would hire a good O coordinator and then just get out of his way.
There's no room for improvement? Sounds sensible to me!