Friendly Wagers?

Why would you ever bet on a KF game?


uncleSam.gif
 
Maybe if you actually asked a non-rhetorical question that wasn't dripping in vitriolic hate. Also, not sure if you saw the name of the thread, but it does say "friendly wagers" not Vegas betting. You're better than this.

Hate? U serious? Crap it was in fun. Some of you need another hobby. You obviously don't read most of my posts.
 
He said against the spread... you may still be correct... do you remember what the spread was?
If you dont know ask 99topdawg and his wife. LOL Plenty of spreading going on there! Go Hawks!
He said against the spread... you may still be correct... do you remember what the spread was?
If you dont know ask 99topdawg and his wife. LOL Plenty of spreading going on there! Go Hawks!
 
If you dont know ask 99topdawg and his wife. LOL Plenty of spreading going on there! Go Hawks!

If you dont know ask 99topdawg and his wife. LOL Plenty of spreading going on there! Go Hawks!
So why not just eliminate all imagination and change his nic to "69"topdawg? :) just sayin
 
and the fact that tomorrow you'd have to be decked out from head to toe in badger gear is why we don't make friendly wagers.
 
Do you think he is overpaid? Or conservative? What are your feelings on hiring his son?

Just to play....yes, yes, and it doesn't make sense.

As I've said before. He is a good coach and is more good at finding rough diamonds that making something out of nothing. Minor changes in his approach would pay big dividends but he rarely does it. He does it enough though to be unpredictable which is counter intuitive to he overall approach. He draws fans in enough to keep them interested. He goes back to conservatism after he draws fans back. That pretty much sums it up.

That is what makes him a tough bet. However, big payoffs involved calculated risk. From that perspective, he's the perfect bet.
 
Just to play....yes, yes, and it doesn't make sense.

As I've said before. He is a good coach and is more good at finding rough diamonds that making something out of nothing. Minor changes in his approach would pay big dividends but he rarely does it. He does it enough though to be unpredictable which is counter intuitive to he overall approach. He draws fans in enough to keep them interested. He goes back to conservatism after he draws fans back. That pretty much sums it up.

That is what makes him a tough bet. However, big payoffs involved calculated risk. From that perspective, he's the perfect bet.
I knew you couldn’t resist complaining.
 
Top