HawkeyesWin
Well-Known Member
The reality of D1 football is that all coaches get 5 year deal for recruiting reasons. On top of that the annual salary is almost always guaranteed. When any coach gets down to 4 years left it's usually extended out to 5 years again.
Here's why the 10 year deal is smart. It is highly unlikely that Iowa's performance in the next 3 years would drop to a level where we would seriously consider firing Kirk. During those years we would have extended his contract anyway to avoid negative recruiting. If performance drops to an unacceptable level in years 4-5 we end up paying $8-9m more than if we would have done the standard rolling 5 year deal.
What we get for risking another $8-9m is stability and branding of our staff as here to stay. We are only risking $8-9m mind you. We only pay if performance falls too low. That is less likely to happen with a long term coach in place. I realize we did have some lethargy in the last contract but this is New Kirk and I believe.
The real risk to Iowa with such a long contract isn't wins and losses, it cord cutting. The BTN subscription and ad revenue may decrease as more people opt out of hefty cable packages. If cord cutting continues its possible ESPN defaults on their long term contracts because they just don't generate the revenue to cover costs. Will this happen in the next 10 years?
Here's why the 10 year deal is smart. It is highly unlikely that Iowa's performance in the next 3 years would drop to a level where we would seriously consider firing Kirk. During those years we would have extended his contract anyway to avoid negative recruiting. If performance drops to an unacceptable level in years 4-5 we end up paying $8-9m more than if we would have done the standard rolling 5 year deal.
What we get for risking another $8-9m is stability and branding of our staff as here to stay. We are only risking $8-9m mind you. We only pay if performance falls too low. That is less likely to happen with a long term coach in place. I realize we did have some lethargy in the last contract but this is New Kirk and I believe.
The real risk to Iowa with such a long contract isn't wins and losses, it cord cutting. The BTN subscription and ad revenue may decrease as more people opt out of hefty cable packages. If cord cutting continues its possible ESPN defaults on their long term contracts because they just don't generate the revenue to cover costs. Will this happen in the next 10 years?