(extending on duffman's idea) Grade the team by category

Bigtenchamp

Well-Known Member
Coaching D+ Inconsistent results - Overly careful methods did not work to win close games. Poor road performances - didn't win enough games with a reasonable schedule.

Offense:

Running Backs C
Wide Recievers B (McNutt had one of the best years ever- but too many drops by this group-lead the big Ten)
Tight End D - no real production
Quarterback B (for a 2nd year starter he played well - too many struggles on the road)
O-Line B+ (as usual- Ferentz forte is our best group)


Defense:

D-line D+ (They did improve at the end of the year
Linebackers C-
Secondary C+ (This unit was probably a B alot of the time, but had some really big let downs - prater certainly wasn't all big-ten)

Special Teams

C+
 
Last edited:
Coaching- A+


Running Back- B
Wide Receivers- B+
Tight Ends- D+
O-line- B-
Quarterback- B+

D-line- C-
Linebackers-D
D-Backs-B

FG/Kickoffs- C
Punting- B+
Kick/Punt Returns- C
 
Coaching- A+


Running Back- B
Wide Receivers- B+
Tight Ends- D+
O-line- B-
Quarterback- B+

D-line- C-
Linebackers-D
D-Backs-B

FG/Kickoffs- C
Punting- B+
Kick/Punt Returns- C

Okay, now this mostly seems reasonable.... Coaching A+? That's kind of silly
 
I think you'd be in a vast minority of what people would consider reasonable.

Compared to 11-2 7-5 is not A+ material
 
Last edited:
Coaching: B
QB: C (only is a first year starter, but was an A sometimes and an F some days so C)
RB: A- (Coker is a big runner, we never really got to see the others)
WR: A- drops
OL: B+ Zus really drops them down a bit here too many penalties/ lapses
TE: C- Starting to see something from CJF finally

DL: D
LB: B had to deal with a bad DLine
DB: B+

Special Teams: F
 
I think u need to give special teams at least a c. the fg kicking an punting games were both very good.
 
I think u need to give special teams at least a c. the fg kicking an punting games were both very good.
not good enough. missed FGs cost us.

FG- D cost us a game or 2
KO- F couldn't put ball in endzone and many larger returns
KOR- D Onside kicks allowed and couldn't execute their own though the kick was good
Punt- A- Guthrie did well had a 12 yarder at Purdue though!
Punt return- F too many fakes given up and too many bouncers allowing more yards for the D

I'd say it's about a D my bad.
 
he was perfect on xp and hit on 70% of fg this year. that's pretty good for a college kicker
 
he was perfect on xp and hit on 70% of fg this year. that's pretty good for a college kicker

He really struggled down the stretch. It was kind of a tale of two seasons for Meyer.

That's said, he was definitely above average. I'd give him a B+.
 
I think you'd be in a vast minority of what people would consider reasonable.

Compared to 11-2 7-5 is not A+ material

I will take that as a compliment with the way this board has been lately.

And what are you talking about compared to 11-2? What are we comparing to 11-2?

This team had the least amount of starters returning in the conference from a team that went 7-5 (4-4) last year.

8-4 or 7-5 is what most reasonable people predicted before the year started and thats where we ended up at.
 
Coaching [C+] - Would have graded much higher had the team been prepared for an onsides kick at Minnesota and/or had been more aggressive at ISU.

Offense:

Running Backs [A] - Over 1300 yards and 15 TDs from Coker nuff said
Wide Recievers [B+] - a few drops are going to happen but for the most part if Vandy got the ball to them they caught it
Tight End [D] - towards the end of the year CJ & Herman got better
Quarterback [C] - Vandy accuracy was inconsistent, especially on the road
OLine [C+] - The line did not play as well as I thought they would coming into this season. They did well blocking on running plays but gave up 26 sacks on pass blocking.

OVERALL - [B-]

Defense:

Dline [D-] - They did better than I thought they would against Michigan and Nebraska. But could not stop the run or get consistent pressure on the QB.
Linebackers [D] - second line of defense was not much better. I really thought Morris would have a breakout season.
Secondary - I would have liked to of seen more picks but when you do not get pressure on the QB there are not going to be many chances.

OVERALL - [D+]

Special Teams [C] - The return team did not score and while the KO returns was sometimes productive the Punt returns were awful. Punt/KO coverages was adequate and other than the Minnesota game Meyer was solid as a place kicker.
 
Coaching:

Player Development: B- (DL and TE have mad good strides, where are backups?)
Game planning/prep: C+
Play calling/schemes: C-
Game decisions/clock mgmt: C-
Overall: C


Offense:

QB: B- (he's had a decent season for as young as he is)
RB: B (coker has done well, backups - not so much)
WR: A- (if it weren't for drops, this would be a solid A)
TE: C+ (CF is developing, the rest suck)
OL: B- (should be better)
Overall: C+ (each group is doing alright, but as a collective they should be better)

Defense:

DL: C+ (started really bad, have gotten much better)
LB: B- (have gotten better as the DL has gotten better)
DB: B- (really disappointed, I thought they would be better)
Overall: B- (they have gotten better - too bad the offense has gotten worse)

Special Teams:

FG/XP: B
KO: C
KR: B
P: B
PR: C-
 
I will take that as a compliment with the way this board has been lately.

And what are you talking about compared to 11-2? What are we comparing to 11-2?

This team had the least amount of starters returning in the conference from a team that went 7-5 (4-4) last year.

8-4 or 7-5 is what most reasonable people predicted before the year started and thats where we ended up at.

So we were on the low side of reasonable. That sounds like C or C- work. A+ is for excellence which would require greatly exceeding expectation.

Just trying to be real. A+ should not even be considered for the staff this year.
 
Coaching: C-, there were a lot of bad decisions over the course of the year, and the team really didn't improve much over the course of the year with the exception of the D-line. OTHO, they did pull the team together for Mich. and Prudue games and Kirk started going for it on 4th in Maroon zone [except against Nebraska for some reason :-\ ]. They also got Marvin as involved as they could in every game.

QB: B, he lit up bad defenses and struggled mightily against good ones. Overall, he was better than average.

RB: C-, I'd give Coker and Rodgers an A- here, but we had no depth (or didn't let the depth play) and it showed. Rodgers only played half the year as well. We ended up 10th in B1G rushing I believe. For Coker and Rodgers my comments are as follows: came on strong in B1G season. Were very, very good at times, but weren't dominant on the whole season. Coker improved as the season went along in running, receiving, and blocking.

WR: A-, the biggest strength of the team. Yeah they had drops, but they also made some ridiculous catches and JVB was off the mark on a number of those drops. This is about as good of a corp as you're going to get, headlined by the best receiver in Iowa history having the best season in Iowa history.

OL: B-, better than average. I thought they played well for their size. They also weren't dominant and got manhandled by PSU. Run blocking improved greatly over the course of the season.

TE: C, did fine blocking, not really a factor in the receiving game although they did perk up towards the end of the year.


DL: C+, absolutely terrible to start the year, then they came on strong towards the end. Were the biggest weakness coming in and ended up holding their own. Binns and Daniels were very good. Not a talented group, but worked their way up to servicable.

LB: D, injuries played a part here, but we didn't get great play out of our linebackers. Talent dropoff in recent years has really hurt. Not real good in either run D or pass D.

DB: B-, some talent here, but also had a bunch of miscues. Miller was learning on the fly and got better. Hyde and Prater were better than average, but gave up a few dumb plays. Mental errors hurt as did trying/needing to do too much on run help.


FG: B+, better than average, but not a sure thing. Struggle later in the year.

KO: C+, last year was an F-- so there was a lot improvement here. The actual coverage was pretty good, but Meyer isn't getting the ball deep enough.

KOR: C+, some decent returns by Bernstine, but we had a killer fumble and weren't consistently getting great field position.

P: B+, I was pleasantly surprised. Did a nice job for the most part.

PR: F-, pretty much a lost cause. I like having the ball in Hyde's hands but it was basically a fair catch or the ball hit the ground and rolled 20 yards on 90% of our punt returns. We lost of ton of yards on punt return.
 
Some of you are being generous on your assessments of the defense. This is the worst defense Iowa has had since 2000 this is not just my opinion it is the worst statistically as well.
 
Top