And Iowa's players were born to play Wisconsin. So there.
Maybe this game will be closer than some think. May just come down to turnovers.
Just don't get punt faked, Iowa. Please.......
Who do you take if you are neutral fan, Borland or Morris?
That might be the funniest thing I have read on this board in a long time.
Really? It's not even close?
That might be the funniest thing I have read on this board in a long time.
Maybe another thread, but some good lbs on the field in Saturday with our three and Borland. Who do you take if you are neutral fan, Borland or Morris?
Really? It's not even close?
I generally respect your posts Hoffa... What do you mean by this?
I'm assuming you don't think Morris is even in the same category as Borland. I'm not sure I agree with that statement, and after I checked the stats I definitely don't agree. Borland gets more hype because he plays for a better team. I certainly understand stats don't tell the whole story. However, Morris is just as important to Iowa's defense as Borland is to Wisconsin's. If you are indeed insinuating that James isn't even comparable to Borland then I think you may be letting the media's hype slightly effect your opinion.
This year James Morris has played 8 games, has 64 tackles, 7.5 tackles for loss, 4 sacks, 3 interceptions, 1 forced fumble, and one recovered fumble.
This year Chris Borland has 57 total tackles, 2 sacks, 0 interceptions, 0 forced fumbles, 0 recovered fumbles...
That's not what I was expecting when I looked up the stats.
Ah yes the stat battle.
I did indeed look up the stats but you are aware those stats are with almost 2 extra games for Morris correct?
Morris is a decent LB but he gets caught out of position, gets washed out by blocks, misses open field tackles, and a lot of times is about a step slow in reading plays.
Again, stats don't tell the whole story you need to watch games and focus on only that position. If you do that you will be shocked how many times he is nowhere to be found or chasing.