ihawkeye
Well-Known Member
A blind squirrel finds a McNutt every now and then.Yes McNutt too, along with a good number of offensive linemen that switched from other positions.
A blind squirrel finds a McNutt every now and then.Yes McNutt too, along with a good number of offensive linemen that switched from other positions.
Question: Derrick Mitchell was listed on the 2014 roster as a Soph running back, if he is looking good now just 4 months after the bowl game smashdown why didnt this offensive coaching staff run him last season.
I dont get it, was he a receiver last season or a running back. Whatever he was he didnt play as a soph. I thougnt he looked really good at Valley High two weeks ago, what is this coaching staff looking at?
I hope he's on KF's good side.
I wouldn't mind that, as I think Mitchell could be a Damon Bullock with power and explosiveness (things Bullock lacked). Last year if we brought in Weisman for 3rd and 3, it was a run, and if it was Bullock it was a pass.....we have to be less predictable, and having a guy that is actually a threat running the ball as well as catching the ball would be a great thing.
They are good at this, I would point out Dallas Clark as a good example of the coaches putting players in the right spot. He started out as a walk on linebacker.
He's a playmaker. He played like 6 positions on his high school team including quarterback. Also read he played some defense in high school which tells me he's not afraid of contact. Had some amazing leaping catches in high school. I was curious about him all of last year as I thought he was going to push for time at WR. Not sure what happened there but I'm definitely happy to hear he's emerging as a tailback.
Providing unpredictability to opposing offenses and defenses hasn't exactly been a strong suit for this coaching staff.
According to a very nice article by Chad Leistikow at HawkeyeCentral.com, Greg Davis said that
Derrick Mitchell, the 6-1", 212 lb RB, converted from WR has really shined this spring, for the
Hawkeyes.
That can only be good news for an offense, that last year, desperately needed a
Playmaker.
It's just hype. I always thought Willies was the real deal, and that's what we were left to believe at the end of Spring football last year. Then, in the Fall - we saw nothing, at least, not much, because he hardly ever played, leaving us all to wonder what the heck, and then, he was gone. I like to looks of Mitchell - he certainly looks the part. But will he end up like Willies, or be the Hawks next 1000 yard rusher? Who knows, I'm just not putting much credence into the whole "surprise of the spring" thing.
Nick, please make an honest attempt at a credible argument by using a slightly more relevant example. At least McNutt switched within the last 7 years.
He probably just needs to show up on time, keep his mouth shut and work hard to achieve that.
Anything Greg Davis says doesn't exude any confidence with this fan what so ever.
I want to point out that more than a few were excited and anticipating a potential player with talent and ability coming into last spring. Labeling Willies as a surprise because he lit up the open scrimmages and spring game was not a surprise to some of us.
Then he played sparingly in the first two games but made 2 big plays. The first was a 30 yard catch that set up a TD late against UNI. Had the ball been on the money from Jake it would have been a long TD. The very next game he caught the game deciding TD during the late rally against Ball St. After all of those performances, he essentially was relegated to obscurity until he quit. The next game against ISU he hardly played. Meanwhile Vandenburg dropped a key slant pass that might have scored or set up a TD.
A big hidden play that cost us dearly.
So I disagree with the notion that Willies was hype or a surprise.
Where as most coaches will just play who ever is the most talented regardless of personal bias.
News flash....he's a troll doing a bit.
A really obvious one.
I suppose the operative phrase is "some of us", because until last Spring, most people weren't aware of Willies' talent. So, when he had a good Spring, I think he could be fairly labeled a "surprise". However, that wasn't really my point, rather, what is said in the Spring means diddly-squat and is not necessarily transferable to the Fall. Whether that's due to the player or the coaches, it doesn't really matter.I want to point out that more than a few were excited and anticipating a potential player with talent and ability coming into last spring. Labeling Willies as a surprise because he lit up the open scrimmages and spring game was not a surprise to some of us.
Then he played sparingly in the first two games but made 2 big plays. The first was a 30 yard catch that set up a TD late against UNI. Had the ball been on the money from Jake it would have been a long TD. The very next game he caught the game deciding TD during the late rally against Ball St. After all of those performances, he essentially was relegated to obscurity until he quit. The next game against ISU he hardly played. Meanwhile Vandenburg dropped a key slant pass that might have scored or set up a TD.
A big hidden play that cost us dearly.
So I disagree with the notion that Willies was hype or a surprise.
^^ Exactly. A lot of hawk receivers make 10-20 catches a year and I really noticed the two catches you reference above because they were huge. Willies missed a hot read by the goalline in the Purdue game and not sure if that had something to do with his continued lack of play after the first two games last year. Then he was said to be nicked-up and before you know it he was gone.
You could see his potential and if there were no other real impediments to him playing then shame on the coaches for not having him play 15+ plays a game at least, mainly passing plays. Willies may have burned some bridges by saying some things internally before he quit and we wont know all the circumstances.