hawkdrummer1
Well-Known Member
Mini-Pitino not really happy about the foul call at the end. What say you? Good call? (4:37)
Mini-Pitino not really happy about the foul call at the end. What say you? Good call? (4:37)
It all started with the charging call on the other end of the court. There is no way in hell the defenders feet were set in order to take that charge. The foul call at the end put Pitino over the top, honestly I can't blame him.
That was a foul, Neb won........
In all honesty who cares, two irrelevant teams, one not going anywhere in March, the other a straight up bubble/NIT type team.
Nebby could still make a run. For whatever reason the computers love Nebraska, I think they have a NET rating of 40, and their next 2 games are against Northwestern and at PSU.
Granted it's a long shot, but their win last night at least gives them a chance.
I'm very interested to see what they do with Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Florida. Those three teams are like a combined 1-20 against Q1 teams, and their overall records suck, but are right around 40 in the NET.
Moving under an airborne player is a charge, obviously. Lateral movement is supposed to be determined by who reaches the spot first; feet don’t have to be set.There seems to be a real epidemic of charging calls where the defender is clearly moving or even moving underneath the offensive player. What ever happened to having your feet set?
Moving under an airborne player is a charge, obviously. Lateral movement is supposed to be determined by who reaches the spot first; feet don’t have to be set.
The called fouls that drives me absolutely nuts is when the ball handler’s and defenser’s feet get tangled and the defender is always called for a foul. Anywhere else that happens on the floor and it’s a no-call. Especially if it’s Dirty Duke and Wisconsin
Yes. Mispoke.Did you misspeak? Moving under an airborne player is a charge? That's the dirtiest kind of foul.