Could the Iowa O-Line actually be better than last year?

It depends on the health of the players. If we stay healthy, we can be a very good O-line.
Remember, its not like we are throwing FR into the line-up hoping they swim instead of sink.
Reiff - RS SO with 11 starts
Vandervelde - SR with 20+ starts
Ferentz - RS SO has a long history with this line scheme
Gettis - RS JR with a start or 2
Zus - RS JR
These guys have been in the system for 3 or 4 yrs. We also have depth behind them.
Our D-line should help them in the field position battle as well.
 
I'm not to sure if they will be better but with Ricky Stanzi having another year under his belt, him saying he's been working on getting the ball out faster and with all three top RB's having some gametime experience and another offseason to prepare they might look better just because of the fact all the other positions on offense will be playing up a notch.

I also agree with Kirby. If they can stay healthy and develop continuity that is a big deal in becoming a good Oline.
 
The key in all this is the center position. If whoever, ends up winning the center battle is the upgrade over Eubanks that I believe they will be....then yes this oline can be much better than last season.

Not trying to knock Raf, he played his best ball as a senior, however the center position is the key to the Iowa Oline.
 
There is no way 2010 line will come near the 2009 line. Sorry.

In individual talent? No. But it's true that sometimes the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. That was not something that could be said about last year's line. It looks like it could be this year.
 
I'm very optimistic that our offensive line will be good enough for us to compete for a Big 10 Championship and perhaps even a National Championship. Here's why.
1)It's never easy replacing multiple starters on the offensive line and teams can be made or broken because of their oline play. It's even tougher when one of those guys is an elite level talent like Bulaga. But the Hawkeyes in the past have faced this situation before and came away ok inspite of loses. I believe they lost 3 or 4 starters from the best offensive line I've witnessed at Iowa after the 2002 season. The good news is the best one (Gallery) came back and anchored a what ended up being another solid Oline the next season. With all due respect to Bulaga, I honestly feel Reiff was our best lineman a year ago. Although he is no Gallery, I'm anticipating that Reiff takes another leap towards becoming the anchor the Hawks are going to need him to be. If he can do that, everyone around him will fall into place.
2) The Oline will be practicing against an elite level Dline. Practicing against that can only make you better in my opinion.
3) The skill positions are loaded. This doesn't have much to do with development of the Oline, but if you are going to be a true contender you have to possess true playmaking skill and the Hawks have it. I know a lot of people aren't fond of 2005 but I still feel it was the best 7-5 team I've ever seen. That team had a solid but unspectacular Oline and was a bit of mystery coming into the season if I remember right (maybe I don't) but the offense was very well balanced and productive. That team I feel was kind of undermined by bad breaks and a young defense that gave good effort but was ultimately average.
I guess what I'm getting at is the "skill" players that year were very good that year and the offense was as well. I see this years team as having even more potential at those spots. This time around, they have a top notch defense backing them up.
4) These players are getting coached by a top notch staff at their positions.
5) A lot of the stand out Dlinemen from the Big 10 have moved on. Wooten, Graham, Schofield, Kirlew, and Odrick are gone. I know new playmakers for other teams will emerge, but those are huge names that the Hawks Oline won't have to deal with and most of them gave us fits a year ago. Halleluyah.
6) As great as last year was, I would think that there is still a big chip on their shoulders. Expectations are high but they are still viewed as they are the 3rd best team in the Big 10 behind Ohio State and Wisconsin. Plus they are viewed somewhat as a fluke team. I may have my black and gold blinders on, but I think they didn't reach their full potential last year. The level of success they were acheiving was new to them. I'm banking on the been there/done that principle. It won't just be a fun ride this time around. This time it's business. I expect them to have even more of killer instinct. 2009 was a step up from 2008, hopefully they take the next step.

I think they can handle the next step...
 
Only time will tell but they have a long way to go.We had a revolving door last year with the injuries but some guys got some good experience.
 
The performance of the 2009 OL didn't reach the lofty expectations that many of us, myself included, had. Of course, not all that was on them. Missing summer/fall camp, Bulaga's thyroid issue, Richardson's injury, and the need to block for 2 FR RBs all contributed to a rather underwhelming '09 display on O.

Don't get me wrong, the 2009 OL was mighty impressive on paper ... and there were plenty of occasions when holes and cutback lanes where there. However, there were still blown blocking assignments and foolish penalties too.

Thus, that leads to the interesting question, how good does the 2010 OL have to be in order to reach the level of the '09 OL. How good does it have to be to surpass it?

Frankly, this may sound strange, but when you consider that Iowa now has 3 experienced RBs who are capable of running the ball AND you consider the how proficient Iowa's passing game will likely be ... it's actually rather likely that the the 2010 OL doesn't even need to be nearly as good for the 2010 O to be A TON better than its '09 counterpart.

In fact, if the 2010 OL enjoys great health and continuity ... it's probably likely that 2010 group could EQUAL the effectiveness of the '09 OL. Don't get me wrong ... the 2010 OL won't be dominant as the '09 OL was capable of being (albeit inconsistently) ... but it will still have the potential to execute well and get the job done.

No offense to Eubanks, but I think that James Ferentz will be able to fill his shoes at C seamlessly. Similarly, I really think that Reiff will be able to step up at LT and play at an exceptionally high level too. Vandervelde, if healthy, will likely be able to save his best for last and be VERY solid at the very least. And it is especially heartening to hear how solid Zusevics and Gettis have been. When you add guys like Hundertmark, Orne, and MacMillan to the mix ... among many others (like Boffeli, Van Sloten, Clark, Scherff, and Donnal) ... it's hard not to be rather excited about the prospects of the unit!
 
Jon: I said upgrade at 2 spots, hold steady at one. Didn't want to name names. Thanks for doing it for me.

Nolan Mac might have something to say about this line-up by the time things shake out. However, in his pre-season presser last year, KF said Gettis and Zus' "time will come." so these guys obviously have the right make-up for success.
 
There is no way 2010 line will come near the 2009 line. Sorry.

The 2009 line wasn't all that great. The fact they will not have to face Brandon Graham, Jamie Kirlew and O'Brian Scholfield already gives the 2010 line a head start over last season.
 
The 2009 line wasn't all that great. The fact they will not have to face Brandon Graham, Jamie Kirlew and O'Brian Scholfield already gives the 2010 line a head start over last season.

Its hard to look at the numbers and see a great O-line.
10th in total yds
9th in rushing yds
9th in scoring
6th in passing
Those are less than impressive numbers. Some of it can be attributed to turn-overs and some to penalties. If the passing was great but the rushing was bad, that could be attributed to the RBs and vice-versa. Its hard to say that the O-line didnt under-perform as a unit.
 
Folks are getting caught too much on the composition of the '09 group ON PAPER.

It's true that we lose Moeaki, Stross, and all those quality guys on the OL.

However, what isn't getting noted is that Iowa's RBs will arguably be a WORLD better in '10 than they were in '09. You could certainly argue that quality RBs didn't help our cause in '07 ... however, then again, the '07 OL completely lacked SR leadership (since there were no SRs) and the majority of the group was composed of underclassmen 1st year starters.

Anyhow, just look at how quality skill players ... in particular, a quality passing game, helped to open up our running game in 2005! And, if you really critically compare and contrast the '05 OL with the '10 OL ... there are many reasons to believe that the '10 group could be much better!

I frankly believe that Stanzi's leadership and experience ... along with the depth and talent at WR and RB will end up being primary contributers to the success of the 2010 O.

Production-wise, I anticipate that the 2010 O will far outshine its '09 counterpart.
 
This is just my opinion but I think that the running backs left alot of yards on the field last season. Until the bowl I think Robinson's run in the Arizona game was the only run of longer than 20 yards, but I am working off of memory. The passing game was the only way to generate explosive plays last season. I saw several times where the backs missed reads or cut back lanes that they (hopefully) won't this season. I also agree with Homer's point that continuity is key for Iowa's success for that unit and Iowa never had it last season. Let's hope that we have it next season. I think other than 2002, Iowa's best Oline could have been 2008. Only Olson missed significant time and Keumpal stepped seamlessly while he was out.
 

Latest posts

Top